<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" ?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/" xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"><channel><title>ESL General English Grammar Questions</title><link>http://www.englishforums.com/English/GeneralEnglishGrammarQuestions/Forum12.htm</link><description>Ask your questions on grammar and get your sentence checked. We answer lots of different types of general English grammar questions here.</description><dc:language>en</dc:language><generator>CSMOD (Build: 3260.39585)</generator><item><title>Re: How many times have you been in / to...?</title><link>http://www.englishforums.com/English/Times/bnrrd/post.htm#147393</link><pubDate>Thu, 13 Oct 2005 06:54:46 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="true">946f00bb-57d3-4b7b-a9a2-059b5341af52:147393</guid><dc:creator>MrPedantic</dc:creator><slash:comments>0</slash:comments><comments>http://www.englishforums.com/English/Times/bnrrd/post.htm#147393</comments><wfw:commentRss>http://www.englishforums.com/English/comments12-147393.xml</wfw:commentRss><description>&lt;P&gt;Hello Riglos&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;I'd probably say "How many times have you been to London?" &lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;Of your other options:&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;1. Not exactly wrong; you can call home and say "I'm in London!", for instance. But in your context,&amp;nbsp;you need a) a sense of motion b) "something to count": "be + to" gives you "occasions", but "be + in" isn't really countable.&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;2. It's ok, but a little stiff and unnatural. It seems overly precise.&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;3. Fine; but it might seem slightly patronising, if the other person were a "seasoned traveller".&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;MrP&lt;/P&gt;&lt;div style="clear:both;"&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</description></item><item><title>Re: How many times have you been in / to...?</title><link>http://www.englishforums.com/English/Times/bnrrb/post.htm#147391</link><pubDate>Thu, 13 Oct 2005 06:47:29 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="true">946f00bb-57d3-4b7b-a9a2-059b5341af52:147391</guid><dc:creator>Mister Micawber</dc:creator><slash:comments>1</slash:comments><comments>http://www.englishforums.com/English/Times/bnrrb/post.htm#147391</comments><wfw:commentRss>http://www.englishforums.com/English/comments12-147391.xml</wfw:commentRss><description>&lt;br&gt;
I don't think that the various verb phrases are so easily sortable,
Mara-- individual and regional preferences come too much into
play.&amp;nbsp; I, for instance, could easily ask a student whether &lt;i&gt;s/he has &lt;/i&gt;ever&lt;i&gt; &lt;b&gt;been to / gone to&lt;/b&gt; Saipan&lt;/i&gt;,
with no difference in meaning (= has s/he ever visited Saipan).&amp;nbsp;
The same holds true for i&lt;i&gt;n/to&lt;/i&gt;:&amp;nbsp; &lt;i&gt;How many times have you &lt;b&gt;been to&lt;/b&gt;/&lt;/i&gt;&lt;i&gt;&lt;b&gt;in
// come to&lt;/b&gt; Yokohama?&lt;/i&gt;-- these options too seem equally natural to me
(though other speakers may have preferences).&lt;br&gt;
&lt;br&gt;
Your other options&amp;nbsp; (#3) are, of course, viable.&lt;br&gt;
&lt;br&gt;&lt;div style="clear:both;"&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</description></item><item><title>How many times have you been in / to...?</title><link>http://www.englishforums.com/English/Times/bmqqq/post.htm</link><pubDate>Thu, 13 Oct 2005 06:10:00 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="true">946f00bb-57d3-4b7b-a9a2-059b5341af52:147389</guid><dc:creator>Riglos</dc:creator><slash:comments>2</slash:comments><comments>http://www.englishforums.com/English/Times/bmqqq/post.htm</comments><wfw:commentRss>http://www.englishforums.com/English/comments12-147389.xml</wfw:commentRss><description>&lt;P&gt;Hi everybody!&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;Here's another question posed by one my students.&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;I had explained the difference between "been to" and "gone to", saying that we use "been to" when the person we are referring to, has been to a place and has come back, as in: "He's been to London 3 times". This means that he went there, came back and is not in London NOW. &lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;Then, we use "gone to" to say that somebody has gone to a place and is still there (the person hasn't come back yet), as in: "He's gone to the Head office."(that's why he is not here NOW).&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;So, one of them asked me what would be the right option if I were in London (as a tourist, I'm not from London) and a Londoner asked me this question: "How many times have you been to London?"&amp;nbsp;The rule wouldn't apply in this case, since I haven't come back and I'm still there. The&amp;nbsp;thing is&amp;nbsp;that I think a Londoner would ask the question differently, maybe replacing "to" by "in", since London is where they are now. So, my options are:&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;1. "How many times have you been in London?"&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;2. "How many times have you come to London (before)?" I think "come" solves the problem quite neatly.&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;3. With a difference in meaning "Is this your first visit / trip to London?", "Have you been here before?"&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;Thanks a lot!&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;Mara.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;div style="clear:both;"&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</description></item></channel></rss>