<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" ?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="http://www.englishforums.com/utility/FeedStylesheets/rss.xsl" media="screen"?><rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/" xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"><channel><title>ESL General English Grammar Questions</title><link>http://www.englishforums.com/English/GeneralEnglishGrammarQuestions/Forum12.htm</link><description>Ask your questions on grammar and get your sentence checked. We answer lots of different types of general English grammar questions here.</description><dc:language>en</dc:language><generator>CSMOD (Build: 3273.32735)</generator><item><title>Re: With which</title><link>http://www.englishforums.com/English/WithWhich/2/dglmz/Post.htm#283429</link><pubDate>Fri, 20 Oct 2006 08:50:39 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">946f00bb-57d3-4b7b-a9a2-059b5341af52:283429</guid><dc:creator>J Lewis</dc:creator><slash:comments>0</slash:comments><comments>http://www.englishforums.com/English/WithWhich/2/dglmz/Post.htm#283429</comments><wfw:commentRss>http://www.englishforums.com/English/comments12-283429.xml</wfw:commentRss><description>As Sextus says, it's specialised language. Also in Italian the word &lt;i&gt;problematica &lt;/i&gt;exists, but Italians have the bad habit of using it to mean problem (&lt;i&gt;problema&lt;/i&gt;) simply because it's longer and sounds more impressive.&lt;br&gt;&lt;div style="clear:both;"&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</description></item><item><title>Re: With which</title><link>http://www.englishforums.com/English/WithWhich/2/dgllv/Post.htm#283411</link><pubDate>Fri, 20 Oct 2006 07:58:47 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">946f00bb-57d3-4b7b-a9a2-059b5341af52:283411</guid><dc:creator>Grammarian-bot</dc:creator><slash:comments>3</slash:comments><comments>http://www.englishforums.com/English/WithWhich/2/dgllv/Post.htm#283411</comments><wfw:commentRss>http://www.englishforums.com/English/comments12-283411.xml</wfw:commentRss><description>&lt;P&gt;&lt;BLOCKQUOTE&gt;&lt;table width="85%"&gt;&lt;tr&gt;&lt;td class="txt4"&gt;&lt;img src="/Themes/default/images/icon-quote.gif"&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;strong&gt;Marius Hancu wrote:&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/td&gt;&lt;/tr&gt;&lt;tr&gt;&lt;td class="quoteTable"&gt;&lt;table width="100%"&gt;&lt;tr&gt;&lt;td width="100%" valign="top" class="txt4"&gt;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;Buy a better dictionary&lt;img src="/emoticons/emotion-1.gif" alt="Smile [:)]" /&gt;&lt;BR&gt;&lt;/td&gt;&lt;/tr&gt;&lt;/table&gt;&lt;/td&gt;&lt;/tr&gt;&lt;/table&gt;&lt;/BLOCKQUOTE&gt;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;Well, I was reffering to sextus' idea of googling &lt;EM&gt;problematic &lt;/EM&gt;and I said that that's what my search results are. The top search results were adjectives.&lt;img src="/emoticons/emotion-12.gif" alt="Angry [:@]" /&gt;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;GB&lt;/P&gt;&lt;div style="clear:both;"&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</description></item><item><title>Re: With which</title><link>http://www.englishforums.com/English/WithWhich/2/dglwl/Post.htm#283367</link><pubDate>Fri, 20 Oct 2006 04:24:44 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">946f00bb-57d3-4b7b-a9a2-059b5341af52:283367</guid><dc:creator>Sextus</dc:creator><slash:comments>4</slash:comments><comments>http://www.englishforums.com/English/WithWhich/2/dglwl/Post.htm#283367</comments><wfw:commentRss>http://www.englishforums.com/English/comments12-283367.xml</wfw:commentRss><description>&lt;P&gt;That's another proof that "problematic" may be used as a noun. I must admit that it is not very common and that most natives don't know that it may be used that way. However, it is thus employed in papers on epistemology and skepticism that are published in international journals of philosophy.&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;Cheers&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;P.S.: it seems to be the same as what happens in Spanish. The term "problemática" is the feminin form of the&amp;nbsp;adjective, but may be used as a noun.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;div style="clear:both;"&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</description></item><item><title>Re: With which</title><link>http://www.englishforums.com/English/WithWhich/2/dglhq/Post.htm#283355</link><pubDate>Fri, 20 Oct 2006 03:51:28 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">946f00bb-57d3-4b7b-a9a2-059b5341af52:283355</guid><dc:creator>Marius Hancu</dc:creator><slash:comments>8</slash:comments><comments>http://www.englishforums.com/English/WithWhich/2/dglhq/Post.htm#283355</comments><wfw:commentRss>http://www.englishforums.com/English/comments12-283355.xml</wfw:commentRss><description>&lt;BLOCKQUOTE&gt;&lt;table width="85%"&gt;&lt;tr&gt;&lt;td class="txt4"&gt;&lt;img src="/Themes/default/images/icon-quote.gif"&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;strong&gt;Grammarian-bot wrote:&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/td&gt;&lt;/tr&gt;&lt;tr&gt;&lt;td class="quoteTable"&gt;&lt;table width="100%"&gt;&lt;tr&gt;&lt;td width="100%" valign="top" class="txt4"&gt;&lt;p&gt;Well guys, according to my search results, problematic is an adjective.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;1. Wiktionary&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&lt;a href="http://en.wiktionary.org/wiki/problematic" target="_blank" title="http://en.wiktionary.org/wiki/problematic"&gt;http://en.wiktionary.org/wiki/problematic&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;2. World Web Online&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&lt;a href="http://www.wordwebonline.com/en/PROBLEMATIC" target="_blank" title="http://www.wordwebonline.com/en/PROBLEMATIC"&gt;http://www.wordwebonline.com/en/PROBLEMATIC&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/td&gt;&lt;/tr&gt;&lt;/table&gt;&lt;/td&gt;&lt;/tr&gt;&lt;/table&gt;&lt;/BLOCKQUOTE&gt;Buy a better dictionary&lt;img src="/emoticons/emotion-1.gif" alt="Smile [:)]" /&gt;&lt;br&gt;
&lt;/p&gt;
------------&lt;br&gt;
&lt;b&gt;prob·lem·at·ic&lt;/b&gt; &amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp; &lt;br&gt;
&lt;br&gt;

Function:&lt;font color="#0000ff"&gt;&lt;i&gt;noun&lt;/i&gt;&lt;/font&gt;&lt;br&gt;

Inflected Form(s):&lt;b&gt;-s&lt;br&gt;
&lt;br&gt;
&lt;/b&gt;&lt;font color="#0000ff"&gt;
Etymology:&lt;i&gt;problematic&lt;/i&gt;, adjective&lt;/font&gt;&lt;br&gt;
&lt;br&gt;

&lt;b&gt;:&lt;/b&gt; something that is problematic  &lt;b&gt;:&lt;/b&gt; a problematic aspect or concern   &amp;lt;&lt;i&gt;problematic&lt;/i&gt;&lt;i&gt;s&lt;/i&gt; of womanhood, of men and women together  -- Stephen Koch&amp;gt;


&lt;br&gt;
&lt;br&gt;


&lt;font face="Arial" size="-1"&gt; http://unabridged.merriam-webster.com&lt;br&gt;
--------------&lt;br&gt;
&lt;/font&gt;&lt;div style="clear:both;"&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</description></item><item><title>Re: With which</title><link>http://www.englishforums.com/English/WithWhich/dglhl/post.htm#283350</link><pubDate>Fri, 20 Oct 2006 03:44:38 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">946f00bb-57d3-4b7b-a9a2-059b5341af52:283350</guid><dc:creator>Grammarian-bot</dc:creator><slash:comments>9</slash:comments><comments>http://www.englishforums.com/English/WithWhich/dglhl/post.htm#283350</comments><wfw:commentRss>http://www.englishforums.com/English/comments12-283350.xml</wfw:commentRss><description>&lt;P&gt;Well guys, according to my search results, problematic is an adjective.&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;1. Wiktionary&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&lt;a href="http://en.wiktionary.org/wiki/problematic" target="_blank" title="http://en.wiktionary.org/wiki/problematic"&gt;http://en.wiktionary.org/wiki/problematic&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;2. World Web Online&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&lt;a href="http://www.wordwebonline.com/en/PROBLEMATIC" target="_blank" title="http://www.wordwebonline.com/en/PROBLEMATIC"&gt;http://www.wordwebonline.com/en/PROBLEMATIC&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;GB&lt;/P&gt;&lt;div style="clear:both;"&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</description></item><item><title>Re: With which</title><link>http://www.englishforums.com/English/WithWhich/dglhz/post.htm#283344</link><pubDate>Fri, 20 Oct 2006 03:36:16 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">946f00bb-57d3-4b7b-a9a2-059b5341af52:283344</guid><dc:creator>Anonymous</dc:creator><slash:comments>5</slash:comments><comments>http://www.englishforums.com/English/WithWhich/dglhz/post.htm#283344</comments><wfw:commentRss>http://www.englishforums.com/English/comments12-283344.xml</wfw:commentRss><description>&lt;BLOCKQUOTE&gt;&lt;table width="85%"&gt;&lt;tr&gt;&lt;td class="txt4"&gt;&lt;img src="/Themes/default/images/icon-quote.gif"&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;strong&gt;Sextus wrote:&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/td&gt;&lt;/tr&gt;&lt;tr&gt;&lt;td class="quoteTable"&gt;&lt;table width="100%"&gt;&lt;tr&gt;&lt;td width="100%" valign="top" class="txt4"&gt; 
&lt;P&gt;Regarding the "missing noun", "problematic"&amp;nbsp;has been used as a noun, as I said. If you google it, you'll find the expressions "Pyrrhonian problematic" and "skeptical problematic".&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&lt;/td&gt;&lt;/tr&gt;&lt;/table&gt;&lt;/td&gt;&lt;/tr&gt;&lt;/table&gt;&lt;/BLOCKQUOTE&gt;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;Well, when I found problematic as an adjective in Wiktionary.&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&lt;a href="http://en.wiktionary.org/wiki/problematic" target="_blank" title="http://en.wiktionary.org/wiki/problematic"&gt;http://en.wiktionary.org/wiki/problematic&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;GB.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;div style="clear:both;"&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</description></item><item><title>Re: With which</title><link>http://www.englishforums.com/English/WithWhich/dglzj/post.htm#283314</link><pubDate>Fri, 20 Oct 2006 01:46:27 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">946f00bb-57d3-4b7b-a9a2-059b5341af52:283314</guid><dc:creator>Marius Hancu</dc:creator><slash:comments>7</slash:comments><comments>http://www.englishforums.com/English/WithWhich/dglzj/post.htm#283314</comments><wfw:commentRss>http://www.englishforums.com/English/comments12-283314.xml</wfw:commentRss><description>&lt;BLOCKQUOTE&gt;&lt;table width="85%"&gt;&lt;tr&gt;&lt;td class="txt4"&gt;&lt;img src="/Themes/default/images/icon-quote.gif"&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;strong&gt;Grammar Geek wrote:&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/td&gt;&lt;/tr&gt;&lt;tr&gt;&lt;td class="quoteTable"&gt;&lt;table width="100%"&gt;&lt;tr&gt;&lt;td width="100%" valign="top" class="txt4"&gt; I think that the "never end a sentence
with a preposition" has been pretty well killed off. In my own opinion,
"with which they deal" sounds artificial.&amp;nbsp; I would use your first
example. missing a noun remains.)&lt;br&gt;
&lt;/td&gt;&lt;/tr&gt;&lt;/table&gt;&lt;/td&gt;&lt;/tr&gt;&lt;/table&gt;&lt;/BLOCKQUOTE&gt;&lt;br&gt;
Same here. &lt;br&gt;&lt;div style="clear:both;"&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</description></item><item><title>Re: With which</title><link>http://www.englishforums.com/English/WithWhich/dgldn/post.htm#283284</link><pubDate>Thu, 19 Oct 2006 23:12:37 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">946f00bb-57d3-4b7b-a9a2-059b5341af52:283284</guid><dc:creator>Sextus</dc:creator><slash:comments>8</slash:comments><comments>http://www.englishforums.com/English/WithWhich/dgldn/post.htm#283284</comments><wfw:commentRss>http://www.englishforums.com/English/comments12-283284.xml</wfw:commentRss><description>&lt;P&gt;Thanks, GG. Yes, it sounded artificial to me, too. That's why I asked.&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;Regarding the "missing noun", "problematic"&amp;nbsp;has been used as a noun, as I said. If you google it, you'll find the expressions "Pyrrhonian problematic" and "skeptical problematic".&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;Cheers&lt;/P&gt;&lt;div style="clear:both;"&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</description></item><item><title>Re: With which</title><link>http://www.englishforums.com/English/WithWhich/dgldh/post.htm#283278</link><pubDate>Thu, 19 Oct 2006 23:06:57 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">946f00bb-57d3-4b7b-a9a2-059b5341af52:283278</guid><dc:creator>Grammar Geek</dc:creator><slash:comments>10</slash:comments><comments>http://www.englishforums.com/English/WithWhich/dgldh/post.htm#283278</comments><wfw:commentRss>http://www.englishforums.com/English/comments12-283278.xml</wfw:commentRss><description>&lt;P&gt;I think that the "never end a sentence with a preposition" has been pretty well killed off. In my own opinion, "with which they deal" sounds artificial.&amp;nbsp; I would use your first example.&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;(Although the point about missing a noun remains.)&lt;/P&gt;&lt;div style="clear:both;"&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</description></item><item><title>Re: With which</title><link>http://www.englishforums.com/English/WithWhich/dglcx/post.htm#283268</link><pubDate>Thu, 19 Oct 2006 22:32:42 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">946f00bb-57d3-4b7b-a9a2-059b5341af52:283268</guid><dc:creator>Tanit</dc:creator><slash:comments>9</slash:comments><comments>http://www.englishforums.com/English/WithWhich/dglcx/post.htm#283268</comments><wfw:commentRss>http://www.englishforums.com/English/comments12-283268.xml</wfw:commentRss><description>&lt;P&gt;Interesting, thank you.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;div style="clear:both;"&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</description></item><item><title>Re: With which</title><link>http://www.englishforums.com/English/WithWhich/dglcj/post.htm#283263</link><pubDate>Thu, 19 Oct 2006 22:23:57 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">946f00bb-57d3-4b7b-a9a2-059b5341af52:283263</guid><dc:creator>Sextus</dc:creator><slash:comments>10</slash:comments><comments>http://www.englishforums.com/English/WithWhich/dglcj/post.htm#283263</comments><wfw:commentRss>http://www.englishforums.com/English/comments12-283263.xml</wfw:commentRss><description>I've seen it used as a noun in, e.g.,&amp;nbsp;the expression "the Pyrrhonian problematic".&lt;div style="clear:both;"&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</description></item><item><title>Re: With which</title><link>http://www.englishforums.com/English/WithWhich/dglcv/post.htm#283258</link><pubDate>Thu, 19 Oct 2006 22:08:55 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">946f00bb-57d3-4b7b-a9a2-059b5341af52:283258</guid><dc:creator>Tanit</dc:creator><slash:comments>11</slash:comments><comments>http://www.englishforums.com/English/WithWhich/dglcv/post.htm#283258</comments><wfw:commentRss>http://www.englishforums.com/English/comments12-283258.xml</wfw:commentRss><description>Isn't &lt;EM&gt;problematic&lt;/EM&gt; an adjective? Did you mean &lt;EM&gt;problem&lt;/EM&gt;?&lt;div style="clear:both;"&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</description></item><item><title>With which</title><link>http://www.englishforums.com/English/WithWhich/dglcb/post.htm</link><pubDate>Thu, 19 Oct 2006 22:02:57 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">946f00bb-57d3-4b7b-a9a2-059b5341af52:283255</guid><dc:creator>Sextus</dc:creator><slash:comments>12</slash:comments><comments>http://www.englishforums.com/English/WithWhich/dglcb/post.htm</comments><wfw:commentRss>http://www.englishforums.com/English/comments12-283255.xml</wfw:commentRss><description>&lt;P&gt;"They are not aware of the skeptical origin of the problematic they deal with."&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;"They are not aware of the skeptical origin of the problematic with which they deal."&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;In formal writing, is it better to use the second phrasing?&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;Thanks&lt;/P&gt;&lt;div style="clear:both;"&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</description></item></channel></rss>