<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" ?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/" xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"><channel><title>ESL General English Grammar Questions</title><link>http://www.englishforums.com/English/GeneralEnglishGrammarQuestions/Forum12.htm</link><description>Ask your questions on grammar and get your sentence checked. We answer lots of different types of general English grammar questions here.</description><dc:language>en</dc:language><generator>CSMOD (Build: 3191.21962)</generator><item><title>Re: Wrought- work or wreak?</title><link>http://www.englishforums.com/English/WroughtWorkOrWreak/vkhzj/post.htm#385331</link><pubDate>Thu, 28 Jun 2007 12:06:07 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="true">946f00bb-57d3-4b7b-a9a2-059b5341af52:385331</guid><dc:creator>Pao3</dc:creator><slash:comments>0</slash:comments><comments>http://www.englishforums.com/English/WroughtWorkOrWreak/vkhzj/post.htm#385331</comments><wfw:commentRss>http://www.englishforums.com/English/comments12-385331.xml</wfw:commentRss><description>Good job!:-) I mean I really appreciate your help. Thank you again. That would answer all my other questions I had. (about wrought havoc and wrought iron^^)</description></item><item><title>Re: Wrought- work or wreak?</title><link>http://www.englishforums.com/English/WroughtWorkOrWreak/vkhzc/post.htm#385324</link><pubDate>Thu, 28 Jun 2007 11:53:48 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="true">946f00bb-57d3-4b7b-a9a2-059b5341af52:385324</guid><dc:creator>Marius Hancu</dc:creator><slash:comments>2</slash:comments><comments>http://www.englishforums.com/English/WroughtWorkOrWreak/vkhzc/post.htm#385324</comments><wfw:commentRss>http://www.englishforums.com/English/comments12-385324.xml</wfw:commentRss><description>It seems things are under dispute&lt;br&gt;
&lt;br&gt;
&lt;a href="http://encarta.msn.com/dictionary_/wrought.html" target="_blank" title="http://encarta.msn.com/dictionary_/wrought.html"&gt;http://encarta.msn.com/dictionary_/wrought.html&lt;/a&gt;&lt;br&gt;
(see the end)&lt;br&gt;
Word Usage&lt;img alt="" src="http://encarta.msn.com/xImages/trans.gif" border="0" width="1"&gt;
&lt;table cellpadding="0" cellspacing="0"&gt;
&lt;tr&gt;&lt;td colspan="3"&gt;&lt;img alt="" src="http://encarta.msn.com/xImages/trans.gif" border="0" height="20"&gt;&lt;/td&gt;&lt;/tr&gt;&lt;tr&gt;&lt;td&gt;&lt;img alt="" src="http://encarta.msn.com/xImages/trans.gif" border="0" width="20"&gt;&lt;/td&gt;&lt;td class="WordKeyBody"&gt;&lt;p&gt;Wrought is an old past tense and past participle not of &lt;i&gt;wreak&lt;/i&gt; (for which the past tense is &lt;i&gt;wreaked&lt;/i&gt;) but of &lt;i&gt;work&lt;/i&gt;: it is the equivalent of modern &lt;i&gt;worked&lt;/i&gt;. Wrought survives mainly as an adjective in a few, rather specialized contexts such as wrought iron; it is seen also in the set phrase What hath God wrought (used by Samuel Morse in the first successful test of the telegraph). &lt;font color="#000080"&gt;&lt;i&gt;Wrought havoc&lt;/i&gt; is not correct; it should be &lt;i&gt;wreaked havoc.&lt;/i&gt;&lt;/font&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;/td&gt;&lt;/tr&gt;
&lt;/table&gt;
-----------------&lt;br&gt;
&lt;br&gt;
but I'd take Oxford's view, which is more explicit than Cambridge in this case. &lt;br&gt;&lt;div style="clear:both;"&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</description></item><item><title>Re: Wrought- work or wreak?</title><link>http://www.englishforums.com/English/WroughtWorkOrWreak/vkhzr/post.htm#385322</link><pubDate>Thu, 28 Jun 2007 11:50:24 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="true">946f00bb-57d3-4b7b-a9a2-059b5341af52:385322</guid><dc:creator>Marius Hancu</dc:creator><slash:comments>5</slash:comments><comments>http://www.englishforums.com/English/WroughtWorkOrWreak/vkhzr/post.htm#385322</comments><wfw:commentRss>http://www.englishforums.com/English/comments12-385322.xml</wfw:commentRss><description>&lt;img src="http://www.askoxford.com/images/phase_2/spc.gif" border="0" height="1" width="35"&gt;

&lt;img src="http://www.askoxford.com/images/interface/concise_oed.gif"&gt;




&lt;table cellpadding="0" cellspacing="0"&gt;
&lt;tr&gt;&lt;td&gt;
&lt;a href="http://www.oup.co.uk/isbn/0-19-861022-X?view=ask"&gt;
&lt;img src="http://www.oup.co.uk/images/covers/0-19-861022-X.gif" alt="Jacket image of the Compact Oxford English Dictionary" border="0"&gt;&lt;/a&gt;
&lt;/td&gt;&lt;/tr&gt;
&lt;/table&gt;








&lt;br&gt;

 get--&gt;


&lt;h2&gt;wreak&lt;/h2&gt;


&lt;p&gt;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;â¢ &lt;b&gt;verb&lt;/b&gt; &lt;b&gt;1&lt;/b&gt; cause (a large amount of damage or harm). &lt;b&gt;2&lt;/b&gt; inflict (vengeance). &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&lt;font size="-1"&gt;â USAGE&lt;/font&gt; The past tense of &lt;b&gt;wreak&lt;/b&gt; is &lt;b&gt;wreaked&lt;/b&gt;, as in &lt;i&gt;rainstorms wreaked havoc yesterday&lt;/i&gt;, not &lt;b&gt;wrought&lt;/b&gt;. When &lt;b&gt;wrought&lt;/b&gt; is used in the phrase &lt;b&gt;wrought havoc&lt;/b&gt;, it is in fact &lt;font color="#0000ff"&gt;an archaic past tense of &lt;b&gt;work&lt;/b&gt;.&lt;/font&gt; &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&lt;font size="-1"&gt;â ORIGIN&lt;/font&gt; Old English, drive (out), avenge; related to &lt;a href="http://www.askoxford.com/concise_oed/wreck" target="_blank" title="http://www.askoxford.com/concise_oed/wreck"&gt;&lt;font size="-1"&gt;WRECK&lt;/font&gt;&lt;/a&gt; and &lt;a href="http://www.askoxford.com/concise_oed/wretch" target="_blank" title="http://www.askoxford.com/concise_oed/wretch"&gt;&lt;font size="-1"&gt;WRETCH&lt;/font&gt;&lt;/a&gt;.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;div style="clear:both;"&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</description></item><item><title>Re: Wrought- work or wreak?</title><link>http://www.englishforums.com/English/WroughtWorkOrWreak/vkhvp/post.htm#385320</link><pubDate>Thu, 28 Jun 2007 11:48:00 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="true">946f00bb-57d3-4b7b-a9a2-059b5341af52:385320</guid><dc:creator>Pao3</dc:creator><slash:comments>3</slash:comments><comments>http://www.englishforums.com/English/WroughtWorkOrWreak/vkhvp/post.htm#385320</comments><wfw:commentRss>http://www.englishforums.com/English/comments12-385320.xml</wfw:commentRss><description>I see. I have Merriam-Webster at home, and I couldn't find there wreak (as 'wrought'). But besides this, it is OK to use 'wrought' as wreak, isn't it.</description></item><item><title>Re: Wrought- work or wreak?</title><link>http://www.englishforums.com/English/WroughtWorkOrWreak/vkhvn/post.htm#385318</link><pubDate>Thu, 28 Jun 2007 11:43:31 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="true">946f00bb-57d3-4b7b-a9a2-059b5341af52:385318</guid><dc:creator>Marius Hancu</dc:creator><slash:comments>4</slash:comments><comments>http://www.englishforums.com/English/WroughtWorkOrWreak/vkhvn/post.htm#385318</comments><wfw:commentRss>http://www.englishforums.com/English/comments12-385318.xml</wfw:commentRss><description>I think dictionary.com takes the AmE view, as does this one:&lt;br&gt;
&lt;br&gt;
&lt;a href="http://www.m-w.com/dictionary/wrought" target="_blank" title="http://www.m-w.com/dictionary/wrought"&gt;http://www.m-w.com/dictionary/wrought&lt;/a&gt;&lt;br&gt;
&lt;br&gt;
and select &lt;br&gt;
wrought&lt;br&gt;
wrought[1]&lt;br&gt;
&lt;br&gt;
&lt;br&gt;&lt;div style="clear:both;"&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</description></item><item><title>Re: Wrought- work or wreak?</title><link>http://www.englishforums.com/English/WroughtWorkOrWreak/vkhvm/post.htm#385317</link><pubDate>Thu, 28 Jun 2007 11:41:39 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="true">946f00bb-57d3-4b7b-a9a2-059b5341af52:385317</guid><dc:creator>Pao3</dc:creator><slash:comments>5</slash:comments><comments>http://www.englishforums.com/English/WroughtWorkOrWreak/vkhvm/post.htm#385317</comments><wfw:commentRss>http://www.englishforums.com/English/comments12-385317.xml</wfw:commentRss><description>I was hoping you would answer:-) I'm most greatful to you. So that note on dictionary.com is deceptive, then.&lt;br /&gt;EDIT:// I haven't seen the last sentence of yours^^  That would explain why there are diferences...</description></item><item><title>Re: Wrought- work or wreak?</title><link>http://www.englishforums.com/English/WroughtWorkOrWreak/vkhvh/post.htm#385312</link><pubDate>Thu, 28 Jun 2007 11:32:14 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="true">946f00bb-57d3-4b7b-a9a2-059b5341af52:385312</guid><dc:creator>Marius Hancu</dc:creator><slash:comments>6</slash:comments><comments>http://www.englishforums.com/English/WroughtWorkOrWreak/vkhvh/post.htm#385312</comments><wfw:commentRss>http://www.englishforums.com/English/comments12-385312.xml</wfw:commentRss><description>Both correct: &lt;b&gt;wrought&lt;/b&gt;&lt;b&gt; or wreaked &lt;/b&gt;as past participles for&lt;b&gt; wreak&lt;/b&gt;&lt;br&gt;
&lt;br&gt;
&lt;a href="http://dictionary.cambridge.org/define.asp?key=91652&amp;amp;dict=CALD" target="_blank" title="http://dictionary.cambridge.org/define.asp?key=91652&amp;amp;dict=CALD"&gt;http://dictionary.cambridge.org/define.asp?key=91652&amp;amp;dict=CALD&lt;/a&gt;&lt;br&gt;
&lt;br&gt;
And &lt;b&gt;wrought&lt;/b&gt; is related to &lt;b&gt;work&lt;/b&gt;. &lt;br&gt;
&lt;br&gt;
dictionary.com&lt;br&gt;
&lt;br&gt;
seems to take an AmE view of things in this case. &lt;br&gt;
&lt;br&gt;&lt;div style="clear:both;"&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</description></item><item><title>Wrought- work or wreak?</title><link>http://www.englishforums.com/English/WroughtWorkOrWreak/vkhvd/post.htm</link><pubDate>Thu, 28 Jun 2007 11:21:50 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="true">946f00bb-57d3-4b7b-a9a2-059b5341af52:385308</guid><dc:creator>Pao3</dc:creator><slash:comments>7</slash:comments><comments>http://www.englishforums.com/English/WroughtWorkOrWreak/vkhvd/post.htm</comments><wfw:commentRss>http://www.englishforums.com/English/comments12-385308.xml</wfw:commentRss><description>Greetings again,&lt;br /&gt;today I've run across a slight problem with meaning of this word 'WROUGHT'. Since I had never seen it before I immediately put it into my Cambridge Advanced Learner's Dictionary to see what it means. It said it is past participle of the word 'WREAK' and that form 'WREAKED' is also possible. Nothing unclear so far, yet, because I didn't know how I should exactly translate it, I had 'wrought' looked up in www.dictionary.com. To my surprise, it found it means 'WORK', with this comment:&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;'The past tense and past participle of wreak is wreaked, not wrought, which is an alternative past tense and past participle of work.'&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;And that leads me to my question, How it really is? Does it mean 'work' or 'wreak'? If only wreak was correct how come that CALD would mislead me??&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Thank you for your answers in advance.</description></item></channel></rss>