<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" ?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="http://www.englishforums.com/utility/FeedStylesheets/rss.xsl" media="screen"?><rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/" xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"><channel><title>ESL General English Grammar Questions</title><link>http://www.englishforums.com/English/EslGeneralEnglishGrammar-Questions/Forum12.htm</link><description>Ask your questions on grammar and get your sentence checked. We answer lots of different types of general English grammar questions here.
&lt;font color=red&gt;DO NOT post paragraphs and compositions here.  Post them in our &lt;a href="http://www.englishforums.com/English/EssayReportCompositionWriting/Forum9.htm"&gt;&lt;b&gt;Essay, Report and Composition Writing Forum&lt;/b&gt;&lt;/a&gt;.&lt;/font&gt;</description><dc:language>en</dc:language><generator>XMOD (Build: 3607.32596)</generator><item><title>Re: lie, lay,....?</title><link>http://www.englishforums.com/English/LieLay/zzxqb/post.htm#446695</link><pubDate>Sun, 22 Mar 2009 16:21:51 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">946f00bb-57d3-4b7b-a9a2-059b5341af52:446695</guid><dc:creator>Philip</dc:creator><slash:comments>0</slash:comments><comments>http://www.englishforums.com/English/LieLay/zzxqb/post.htm#446695</comments><wfw:commentRss>http://www.englishforums.com/English/comments12-446695.xml</wfw:commentRss><description>Kooyeen wrote:    Thanks! I really don't understand the problem, but thanks, lol        One is regular, the other is not. When both verbs share a form, it makes it confusing.</description></item><item><title>Re: lie, lay,....?</title><link>http://www.englishforums.com/English/LieLay/zzxqb/post.htm#446599</link><pubDate>Sun, 22 Mar 2009 16:21:51 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">946f00bb-57d3-4b7b-a9a2-059b5341af52:446599</guid><dc:creator>Kooyeen</dc:creator><slash:comments>1</slash:comments><comments>http://www.englishforums.com/English/LieLay/zzxqb/post.htm#446599</comments><wfw:commentRss>http://www.englishforums.com/English/comments12-446599.xml</wfw:commentRss><description>Thanks! I really don't understand the problem, but thanks, lol</description></item><item><title>Re: lie, lay,....?</title><link>http://www.englishforums.com/English/LieLay/zzxqb/post.htm#446596</link><pubDate>Fri, 22 May 2009 15:21:51 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">946f00bb-57d3-4b7b-a9a2-059b5341af52:446596</guid><dc:creator>Grammar Geek</dc:creator><slash:comments>2</slash:comments><comments>http://www.englishforums.com/English/LieLay/zzxqb/post.htm#446596</comments><wfw:commentRss>http://www.englishforums.com/English/comments12-446596.xml</wfw:commentRss><description>Because the simple past of "to lie" is "lay," the bare infinitive and primary form of "to lay." And the "I have lain" form throws us all - it's not used much, but "laid" is heard often, so we want to use "laid" when "lain" is correct. Not many of our verb forms take the -n ending when the verb itself doesnt end in -n. Sewn, lain, worn.... and even with sewn, you'll also hear "have sewed," which is listed as an alternative. 
 I have no trouble with lie and lay in the present, but I have to stop and think when I go to the past or present perfect to make sure I have the correct form of the verb.</description></item><item><title>Re: lie, lay,....?</title><link>http://www.englishforums.com/English/LieLay/zzxqb/post.htm#446595</link><pubDate>Sun, 22 Mar 2009 16:21:51 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">946f00bb-57d3-4b7b-a9a2-059b5341af52:446595</guid><dc:creator>CalifJim</dc:creator><slash:comments>3</slash:comments><comments>http://www.englishforums.com/English/LieLay/zzxqb/post.htm#446595</comments><wfw:commentRss>http://www.englishforums.com/English/comments12-446595.xml</wfw:commentRss><description>What are they confused about?    
 
They think that when they say or hear 
 
 I was very tired, so I lay d own for a while to rest. 
 
they are saying or hearing 
 
 I was very tired, so I lai d d own for a while to rest 
 
because they sound the same. 
 
But they're not! 
 
Is that confusing enough for you?  
 
CJ</description></item><item><title>Re: lie, lay,....?</title><link>http://www.englishforums.com/English/LieLay/zzxqb/post.htm#446590</link><pubDate>Wed, 22 Apr 2009 15:21:51 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">946f00bb-57d3-4b7b-a9a2-059b5341af52:446590</guid><dc:creator>Kooyeen</dc:creator><slash:comments>4</slash:comments><comments>http://www.englishforums.com/English/LieLay/zzxqb/post.htm#446590</comments><wfw:commentRss>http://www.englishforums.com/English/comments12-446590.xml</wfw:commentRss><description>Anonymous wrote:     Hi, I was doing a search on common mistakes in English an I found this text: 
 “ Two very easily confused words. Lay, laid, laid: principal parts of the verb which means “ to put (place) down, or in position.” “I shall lay the rug”.” I laid the rug.”” I have laid the rug.” Lay is a transitive verb: that is, it takes an object.. 
   
 Lie, lay lain: principal parts of the verb which means “ to recline or response.” “ She will lie in the hammock.” “ She is lying in the hammock.” “ She lay in he hammock.” “ She lay in the hammock yesterday.” “ She has lain there all afternoon.” Lie is an intransitive verb; it never takes an object.” 
   
     Hi, I heard that natives are confused about that too, but I don't...</description></item><item><title>Re: lie, lay,....?</title><link>http://www.englishforums.com/English/LieLay/zzxqb/post.htm#446503</link><pubDate>Wed, 22 Apr 2009 15:21:52 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">946f00bb-57d3-4b7b-a9a2-059b5341af52:446503</guid><dc:creator>Philip</dc:creator><slash:comments>5</slash:comments><comments>http://www.englishforums.com/English/LieLay/zzxqb/post.htm#446503</comments><wfw:commentRss>http://www.englishforums.com/English/comments12-446503.xml</wfw:commentRss><description>Anonymous wrote:    
 Hi, I was doing a search on common mistakes in English an I found this text: 
 “ Two very easily confused words. Lay, laid, laid: principal parts of the verb which means “ to put (place) down, or in position.” “I shall lay the rug”.” I laid the rug.”” I have laid the rug.” Lay is a transitive verb: that is, it takes an object.. 
   
 Lie, lay lain: principal parts of the verb which means “ to recline or response.” “ She will lie in the hammock.” “ She is lying in the hammock.” “ She lay in he hammock.” “ She lay in the hammock yesterday.” “ She has lain there all afternoon.” Lie is an intransitive verb; it never takes an object.”  
   
 Is he kidding? Is it that “lay” means for example to place something on...</description></item><item><title>lie, lay,....?</title><link>http://www.englishforums.com/English/LieLay/zzxqb/post.htm</link><pubDate>Thu, 22 Jan 2009 16:21:52 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">946f00bb-57d3-4b7b-a9a2-059b5341af52:446489</guid><dc:creator>Anonymous</dc:creator><slash:comments>6</slash:comments><comments>http://www.englishforums.com/English/LieLay/zzxqb/post.htm</comments><wfw:commentRss>http://www.englishforums.com/English/comments12-446489.xml</wfw:commentRss><description>Hi, I was doing a search on common mistakes in English an I found this text: 
 “ Two very easily confused words. Lay, laid, laid: principal parts of the verb which means “ to put (place) down, or in position.” “I shall lay the rug”.” I laid the rug.”” I have laid the rug.” Lay is a transitive verb: that is, it takes an object.. 
   
 Lie, lay lain: principal parts of the verb which means “ to recline or response.” “ She will lie in the hammock.” “ She is lying in the hammock.” “ She lay in he hammock.” “ She lay in the hammock yesterday.” “ She has lain there all afternoon.” Lie is an intransitive verb; it never takes an object.” 
   
 Is he kidding? Is it that “lay” means for example to place something on the floor? “ lie” means...</description></item></channel></rss>