<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" ?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="http://www.englishforums.com/utility/FeedStylesheets/rss.xsl" media="screen"?><rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/" xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"><channel><title>ESL General English Grammar Questions</title><link>http://www.englishforums.com/English/EslGeneralEnglishGrammar-Questions/Forum12.htm</link><description>Ask your questions on grammar and get your sentence checked. We answer lots of different types of general English grammar questions here.
&lt;font color=red&gt;DO NOT post paragraphs and compositions here.  Post them in our &lt;a href="http://www.englishforums.com/English/EssayReportCompositionWriting/Forum9.htm"&gt;&lt;b&gt;Essay, Report and Composition Writing Forum&lt;/b&gt;&lt;/a&gt;.&lt;/font&gt;</description><dc:language>en</dc:language><generator>XMOD (Build: 3616.28671)</generator><item><title>Re: "if only because" is this correct usage ??</title><link>http://www.englishforums.com/English/BecauseCorrectUsage/2/jlzg/Post.htm#688331</link><pubDate>Wed, 18 Mar 2009 21:33:25 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">946f00bb-57d3-4b7b-a9a2-059b5341af52:688331</guid><dc:creator>Anonymous</dc:creator><slash:comments>0</slash:comments><comments>http://www.englishforums.com/English/BecauseCorrectUsage/2/jlzg/Post.htm#688331</comments><wfw:commentRss>http://www.englishforums.com/English/comments12-688331.xml</wfw:commentRss><description>The expression If only because is functioning as a subordinating conjunction in a dependent clause. The usage sounds awkward; however, it is correct. 
 Best wishes, 
 Sally</description></item><item><title>Re: "if only because" is this correct usage ??</title><link>http://www.englishforums.com/English/BecauseCorrectUsage/2/jlzg/Post.htm#560162</link><pubDate>Wed, 27 May 2009 07:17:07 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">946f00bb-57d3-4b7b-a9a2-059b5341af52:560162</guid><dc:creator>Anonymous</dc:creator><slash:comments>1</slash:comments><comments>http://www.englishforums.com/English/BecauseCorrectUsage/2/jlzg/Post.htm#560162</comments><wfw:commentRss>http://www.englishforums.com/English/comments12-560162.xml</wfw:commentRss><description>I think so. They argue for its necessity if only because average salaries for women are still considerably lower They argue for its necessity, if there is only a reason, because average salaries for women are still considerably lower</description></item><item><title>Re: "if only because" is this correct usage ??</title><link>http://www.englishforums.com/English/BecauseCorrectUsage/2/jlzg/Post.htm#558994</link><pubDate>Fri, 27 Mar 2009 08:17:07 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">946f00bb-57d3-4b7b-a9a2-059b5341af52:558994</guid><dc:creator>Anonymous</dc:creator><slash:comments>2</slash:comments><comments>http://www.englishforums.com/English/BecauseCorrectUsage/2/jlzg/Post.htm#558994</comments><wfw:commentRss>http://www.englishforums.com/English/comments12-558994.xml</wfw:commentRss><description>&amp;quot;If only because&amp;quot; = even if there is no better reason than The saying serves to either make light of the reason given, or add special importance to it.</description></item><item><title>Re: "if only because" is this correct usage ??</title><link>http://www.englishforums.com/English/BecauseCorrectUsage/2/jlzg/Post.htm#538872</link><pubDate>Wed, 27 May 2009 07:17:07 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">946f00bb-57d3-4b7b-a9a2-059b5341af52:538872</guid><dc:creator>Anonymous</dc:creator><slash:comments>3</slash:comments><comments>http://www.englishforums.com/English/BecauseCorrectUsage/2/jlzg/Post.htm#538872</comments><wfw:commentRss>http://www.englishforums.com/English/comments12-538872.xml</wfw:commentRss><description>Thank you guys! I am reparing GMAT too. Thank you for the help!</description></item><item><title>Re: &amp;amp;quot;if only because&amp;amp;quot; is this correct usage ??</title><link>http://www.englishforums.com/English/BecauseCorrectUsage/2/jlzg/Post.htm#439022</link><pubDate>Fri, 27 Feb 2009 08:17:07 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">946f00bb-57d3-4b7b-a9a2-059b5341af52:439022</guid><dc:creator>Clive</dc:creator><slash:comments>4</slash:comments><comments>http://www.englishforums.com/English/BecauseCorrectUsage/2/jlzg/Post.htm#439022</comments><wfw:commentRss>http://www.englishforums.com/English/comments12-439022.xml</wfw:commentRss><description>Hi, 
 
  If at all, only because.. . Doesn't it work, too? 
   
 This is OK, although it sounds like it introduces one of those sentence fragments that we often use in speech. Can you find a way to use it in a complete sentence? 
 Best wishes, Clive</description></item><item><title>Re: &amp;amp;quot;if only because&amp;amp;quot; is this correct usage ??</title><link>http://www.englishforums.com/English/BecauseCorrectUsage/2/jlzg/Post.htm#438956</link><pubDate>Fri, 27 Feb 2009 08:17:07 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">946f00bb-57d3-4b7b-a9a2-059b5341af52:438956</guid><dc:creator>Teleostomi</dc:creator><slash:comments>5</slash:comments><comments>http://www.englishforums.com/English/BecauseCorrectUsage/2/jlzg/Post.htm#438956</comments><wfw:commentRss>http://www.englishforums.com/English/comments12-438956.xml</wfw:commentRss><description>If at all, only because.. . 
 
Doesn't it work, too?</description></item><item><title>Re: &amp;amp;quot;if only because&amp;amp;quot; is this correct usage ??</title><link>http://www.englishforums.com/English/BecauseCorrectUsage/2/jlzg/Post.htm#406123</link><pubDate>Mon, 27 Apr 2009 07:17:07 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">946f00bb-57d3-4b7b-a9a2-059b5341af52:406123</guid><dc:creator>Teleostomi</dc:creator><slash:comments>6</slash:comments><comments>http://www.englishforums.com/English/BecauseCorrectUsage/2/jlzg/Post.htm#406123</comments><wfw:commentRss>http://www.englishforums.com/English/comments12-406123.xml</wfw:commentRss><description>If (asked about the reason, I'd say it's) only because...</description></item><item><title>Re: &amp;amp;quot;if only because&amp;amp;quot; is this correct usage ??</title><link>http://www.englishforums.com/English/BecauseCorrectUsage/jlzg/post.htm#337922</link><pubDate>Tue, 27 Jan 2009 08:17:07 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">946f00bb-57d3-4b7b-a9a2-059b5341af52:337922</guid><dc:creator>Anonymous</dc:creator><slash:comments>7</slash:comments><comments>http://www.englishforums.com/English/BecauseCorrectUsage/jlzg/post.htm#337922</comments><wfw:commentRss>http://www.englishforums.com/English/comments12-337922.xml</wfw:commentRss><description>Maybe we can think of 'if only because' as an abbreviation of this: 'if no particular reason for that, then just because...', can't we?</description></item><item><title>Re: &amp;amp;quot;if only because&amp;amp;quot; is this correct usage ??</title><link>http://www.englishforums.com/English/BecauseCorrectUsage/jlzg/post.htm#47505</link><pubDate>Wed, 27 May 2009 07:17:07 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">946f00bb-57d3-4b7b-a9a2-059b5341af52:47505</guid><dc:creator>CalifJim</dc:creator><slash:comments>8</slash:comments><comments>http://www.englishforums.com/English/BecauseCorrectUsage/jlzg/post.htm#47505</comments><wfw:commentRss>http://www.englishforums.com/English/comments12-47505.xml</wfw:commentRss><description>Now you understand the usage if only because you have discussed it and thought about it for a while!</description></item><item><title>Re: &amp;amp;quot;if only because&amp;amp;quot; is this correct usage ??</title><link>http://www.englishforums.com/English/BecauseCorrectUsage/jlzg/post.htm#47502</link><pubDate>Tue, 27 Jan 2009 08:17:07 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">946f00bb-57d3-4b7b-a9a2-059b5341af52:47502</guid><dc:creator>sharad</dc:creator><slash:comments>9</slash:comments><comments>http://www.englishforums.com/English/BecauseCorrectUsage/jlzg/post.htm#47502</comments><wfw:commentRss>http://www.englishforums.com/English/comments12-47502.xml</wfw:commentRss><description>Thanks a lot. Now I do get the usage of "if only because".</description></item><item><title>Re: &amp;amp;quot;if only because&amp;amp;quot; is this correct usage ??</title><link>http://www.englishforums.com/English/BecauseCorrectUsage/jlzg/post.htm#47501</link><pubDate>Wed, 27 May 2009 07:17:07 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">946f00bb-57d3-4b7b-a9a2-059b5341af52:47501</guid><dc:creator>CalifJim</dc:creator><slash:comments>10</slash:comments><comments>http://www.englishforums.com/English/BecauseCorrectUsage/jlzg/post.htm#47501</comments><wfw:commentRss>http://www.englishforums.com/English/comments12-47501.xml</wfw:commentRss><description>Yes. It does mean that. However, there is just one more slight nuance of meaning in "if only because" which I feel your "translation" does not capture.  I clean the kitchen floor once a month for no better reason than that I've gotten into the habit.  The sentence just above seems to capture the meaning just a slight bit better, to my ear.  _________  Another related idiomatic pattern with "if" is as follows:  If I clean the floor, it's because I'm obsessive.   We could almost call this "non-conditional if ", because it really is just a fancier way of saying "I clean the floor because I'm obsessive." It certainly doesn't mean "If I clean the floor, I'm obsessive" nor "If I'm obsessive, I clean the floor."</description></item><item><title>Re: &amp;quot;if only because&amp;quot; is this correct usage ??</title><link>http://www.englishforums.com/English/BecauseCorrectUsage/jlzg/post.htm#47499</link><pubDate>Tue, 27 Jan 2009 08:17:07 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">946f00bb-57d3-4b7b-a9a2-059b5341af52:47499</guid><dc:creator>sharad</dc:creator><slash:comments>11</slash:comments><comments>http://www.englishforums.com/English/BecauseCorrectUsage/jlzg/post.htm#47499</comments><wfw:commentRss>http://www.englishforums.com/English/comments12-47499.xml</wfw:commentRss><description>Jim, I am bothering you one more time.   I clean the kitchen floor once a month if only because I've gotten into the habit.  Does this mean :   If I clean the kitchen floor once a month, it would be only because I've gotten into the habit.  ??  thanks, Sharad.</description></item><item><title>Re: &amp;quot;if only because&amp;quot; is this correct usage ??</title><link>http://www.englishforums.com/English/BecauseCorrectUsage/jlzg/post.htm#47493</link><pubDate>Fri, 27 Mar 2009 08:17:07 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">946f00bb-57d3-4b7b-a9a2-059b5341af52:47493</guid><dc:creator>CalifJim</dc:creator><slash:comments>12</slash:comments><comments>http://www.englishforums.com/English/BecauseCorrectUsage/jlzg/post.htm#47493</comments><wfw:commentRss>http://www.englishforums.com/English/comments12-47493.xml</wfw:commentRss><description>Yes. "if only because" is purely idiomatic.  I clean the kitchen floor because it's dirty. = I do the cleaning for this reason: The floor is dirty at that time.  I clean the kitchen floor only because it's dirty. = I do the cleaning for this reason, and only this reason; I don't do it for any other reason: The floor is dirty at that time.  I clean the kitchen floor once a month if only because I've gotten into the habit. = I do the cleaning for no really good reason. I do not do the cleaning because the floor is necessarilydirty, for example. Maybe IF I do the cleaning, the real reason is ONLY/simply/just BECAUSE I'm in the habit of doing so, whether the floor is dirty or not.</description></item><item><title>Re: &amp;quot;if only because&amp;quot; is this correct usage ??</title><link>http://www.englishforums.com/English/BecauseCorrectUsage/jlzg/post.htm#47492</link><pubDate>Mon, 27 Apr 2009 07:17:07 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">946f00bb-57d3-4b7b-a9a2-059b5341af52:47492</guid><dc:creator>sharad</dc:creator><slash:comments>13</slash:comments><comments>http://www.englishforums.com/English/BecauseCorrectUsage/jlzg/post.htm#47492</comments><wfw:commentRss>http://www.englishforums.com/English/comments12-47492.xml</wfw:commentRss><description>Hi Jim,  Thanks.  I somehow feel that IF and BECAUSE can't go togethor. Here, IF means 'on the condition'. So why do we need 'because' ? Usage of 'because' means 'for the reason' and reason being already true.   I still did not understand the usage of "if only because". However, I do understand your translated sentence. Little more explanation and few examples will help.  Also, let me know whether "if only because" is an idiom ??   thanks, Sharad</description></item><item><title>Re: "if only because" is this correct usage ??</title><link>http://www.englishforums.com/English/BecauseCorrectUsage/jlzg/post.htm#47491</link><pubDate>Mon, 27 Apr 2009 07:17:07 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">946f00bb-57d3-4b7b-a9a2-059b5341af52:47491</guid><dc:creator>CalifJim</dc:creator><slash:comments>14</slash:comments><comments>http://www.englishforums.com/English/BecauseCorrectUsage/jlzg/post.htm#47491</comments><wfw:commentRss>http://www.englishforums.com/English/comments12-47491.xml</wfw:commentRss><description>"if only because" is correct, yes.  Proponents of the equal rights amendments argue for its necessity and perhaps they do so for the sole reason that average salaries for women are still considerably lower than those for men with comparable jobs and work experience.</description></item><item><title>"if only because" is this correct usage ??</title><link>http://www.englishforums.com/English/BecauseCorrectUsage/jlzg/post.htm</link><pubDate>Tue, 27 Jan 2009 08:17:07 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">946f00bb-57d3-4b7b-a9a2-059b5341af52:47487</guid><dc:creator>sharad</dc:creator><slash:comments>15</slash:comments><comments>http://www.englishforums.com/English/BecauseCorrectUsage/jlzg/post.htm</comments><wfw:commentRss>http://www.englishforums.com/English/comments12-47487.xml</wfw:commentRss><description>Dear members,  According to Kaplan (GMAT tutor) the following sentence is correct in GMAT land . Kaplan has not  given an explanation for how "if only because" makes sense in this statement.   Proponents of the equal rights amendments argue for its necessity if only because averge salaries for women are still considerably lower than those for men with comparable jobs and work experience.  I would appreciate your comments.  Thanks, Sharad.</description></item></channel></rss>