<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" ?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="http://www.englishforums.com/utility/FeedStylesheets/rss.xsl" media="screen"?><rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/" xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"><channel><title>ESL General English Grammar Questions</title><link>http://www.englishforums.com/English/EslGeneralEnglishGrammar-Questions/Forum12.htm</link><description>Ask your questions on grammar and get your sentence checked. We answer lots of different types of general English grammar questions here.
&lt;font color=red&gt;DO NOT post paragraphs and compositions here.  Post them in our &lt;a href="http://www.englishforums.com/English/EssayReportCompositionWriting/Forum9.htm"&gt;&lt;b&gt;Essay, Report and Composition Writing Forum&lt;/b&gt;&lt;/a&gt;.&lt;/font&gt;</description><dc:language>en</dc:language><generator>XMOD (Build: 3614.32638)</generator><item><title>Re: full of/filled with</title><link>http://www.englishforums.com/English/FullOfFilledWith/znpzj/post.htm#485908</link><pubDate>Fri, 24 Apr 2009 02:13:33 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">946f00bb-57d3-4b7b-a9a2-059b5341af52:485908</guid><dc:creator>Clive</dc:creator><slash:comments>0</slash:comments><comments>http://www.englishforums.com/English/FullOfFilledWith/znpzj/post.htm#485908</comments><wfw:commentRss>http://www.englishforums.com/English/comments12-485908.xml</wfw:commentRss><description>Hi, 
 &amp;quot;We live in a world that is full of colors.&amp;quot;  
  
 &amp;quot;The world is full of dogs and cats.&amp;quot;  
 My English-speaking friends told me that the phrase &amp;quot;filled with&amp;quot; would be better in those two sentences, but I don&amp;#39;t understand why. 
  Can anybody please tell me the difference between the two, &amp;quot;full of&amp;quot; and &amp;quot;filled with&amp;quot;?  I really don&amp;#39;t see much difference here at all. 
 Perhaps &amp;#39;filled with&amp;#39; focuses more on the action of &amp;#39;filling&amp;#39;, and raises the question of who did the filling, ie &amp;#39;filled with (by whom?)&amp;#39;. It might even be seen as hinting at a religious question. 
 Best wishes, Clive</description></item><item><title>full of/filled with</title><link>http://www.englishforums.com/English/FullOfFilledWith/znpzj/post.htm</link><pubDate>Sat, 24 Jan 2009 03:13:33 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">946f00bb-57d3-4b7b-a9a2-059b5341af52:485903</guid><dc:creator>Anonymous</dc:creator><slash:comments>1</slash:comments><comments>http://www.englishforums.com/English/FullOfFilledWith/znpzj/post.htm</comments><wfw:commentRss>http://www.englishforums.com/English/comments12-485903.xml</wfw:commentRss><description>&amp;quot;We live in a world that is full of colors.&amp;quot; 
 &amp;quot;The world is full of dogs and cats.&amp;quot; 
 My English-speaking friends told me that the phrase &amp;quot;filled with&amp;quot; would be better in those two sentences, but I don&amp;#39;t understand why. 
 Can anybody please tell me the difference between the two, &amp;quot;full of&amp;quot; and &amp;quot;filled with&amp;quot;? 
  Thank you very much.</description></item></channel></rss>