<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" ?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/" xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"><channel><title>ESL General English Grammar Questions</title><link>http://www.englishforums.com/English/GeneralEnglishGrammarQuestions/Forum12.htm</link><description>Ask your questions on grammar and get your sentence checked. We answer lots of different types of general English grammar questions here.</description><dc:language>en</dc:language><generator>CSMOD (Build: 3191.21962)</generator><item><title>Re: comma to link separate, yet related clauses?</title><link>http://www.englishforums.com/English/CommaLinkSeparateRelatedClauses/zxcmb/post.htm#487170</link><pubDate>Mon, 10 Mar 2008 22:23:12 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="true">946f00bb-57d3-4b7b-a9a2-059b5341af52:487170</guid><dc:creator>Cool Breeze</dc:creator><slash:comments>0</slash:comments><comments>http://www.englishforums.com/English/CommaLinkSeparateRelatedClauses/zxcmb/post.htm#487170</comments><wfw:commentRss>http://www.englishforums.com/English/comments12-487170.xml</wfw:commentRss><description>Hi Believer&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;May I suggest that you post sentences written by people who know English. It is impossible to comment on anything that looks like English but but makes little sense.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Cheers&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;CB&amp;nbsp;&lt;div style="clear:both;"&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</description></item><item><title>comma to link separate, yet related clauses?</title><link>http://www.englishforums.com/English/CommaLinkSeparateRelatedClauses/zxcjq/post.htm</link><pubDate>Mon, 10 Mar 2008 20:00:22 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="true">946f00bb-57d3-4b7b-a9a2-059b5341af52:487134</guid><dc:creator>Believer</dc:creator><slash:comments>1</slash:comments><comments>http://www.englishforums.com/English/CommaLinkSeparateRelatedClauses/zxcjq/post.htm</comments><wfw:commentRss>http://www.englishforums.com/English/comments12-487134.xml</wfw:commentRss><description>&lt;p&gt;Hi,&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;I think you can use a comma to sort of link two separately written, yet very related-in-content clauses like this:&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;em&gt;Thank you, it was good to receive a gift of appreciation by you last week.&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;I think &amp;#39;Thank you&amp;#39; and what follows can be thought of as two separate clauses yet can be linked by a comma.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;em&gt;&lt;u&gt;That was his decision&lt;/u&gt;, deciding to support his care his aged father by himself&amp;nbsp;and not put the father somewhere difficult to care for&amp;nbsp;was&amp;nbsp;the right thing to do.&amp;nbsp;-- Since the underlined clause contains an element, which is &amp;#39;decision&amp;#39;. that is further elucidated by&amp;nbsp;the longer clause that followed, I think it could be argued a comma is correclty used. Right?&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;em&gt;But you wouldn&amp;#39;t agree this use of a comma is correct, would you?&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;em&gt;&lt;u&gt;That was thrown abruptly&lt;/u&gt;, he could not have anticipated its coming while quite immersed in his conversation with his old friend.&amp;nbsp;-- &amp;#39;it&amp;#39; refers to a ball, in this case.&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Are there a guideline as to this use of comma (if it is in fact correctly used)?&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;div style="clear:both;"&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</description></item></channel></rss>