<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" ?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/" xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"><channel><title>ESL General English Grammar Questions</title><link>http://www.englishforums.com/English/GeneralEnglishGrammarQuestions/Forum12.htm</link><description>Ask your questions on grammar and get your sentence checked. We answer lots of different types of general English grammar questions here.</description><dc:language>en</dc:language><generator>CSMOD (Build: 3191.21962)</generator><item><title>Re:   Has/have</title><link>http://www.englishforums.com/English/HasHave/grzpb/post.htm#502827</link><pubDate>Sun, 20 Apr 2008 00:42:37 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="true">946f00bb-57d3-4b7b-a9a2-059b5341af52:502827</guid><dc:creator>Liveinjapan</dc:creator><slash:comments>1</slash:comments><comments>http://www.englishforums.com/English/HasHave/grzpb/post.htm#502827</comments><wfw:commentRss>http://www.englishforums.com/English/comments12-502827.xml</wfw:commentRss><description>&lt;p&gt;Thank you all!&amp;nbsp;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;BLOCKQUOTE&gt;&lt;div&gt;&lt;img src="/Themes/englishforums/images/icon-quote.gif"&gt; &lt;strong&gt;MrPedantic&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;div&gt;2. Of the languages that have many speakers, English is the easiest.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;(No one would use &amp;quot;has&amp;quot; here.)&lt;br /&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;/BLOCKQUOTE&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Great idea!&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Kooyeen, your explanation is quite understandable. Thanks.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;div style="clear:both;"&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</description></item><item><title>Re:   Has/have</title><link>http://www.englishforums.com/English/HasHave/grzlx/post.htm#502772</link><pubDate>Sat, 19 Apr 2008 21:34:20 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="true">946f00bb-57d3-4b7b-a9a2-059b5341af52:502772</guid><dc:creator>MrPedantic</dc:creator><slash:comments>2</slash:comments><comments>http://www.englishforums.com/English/HasHave/grzlx/post.htm#502772</comments><wfw:commentRss>http://www.englishforums.com/English/comments12-502772.xml</wfw:commentRss><description>A parallel case may clarify:&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;1. English is the easiest of the languages that have many speakers.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;which can be rephrased as:&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;2. Of the languages that have many speakers, English is the easiest.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;(No one would use &amp;quot;has&amp;quot; here.)&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Best wishes,&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;MrP&lt;br /&gt;&lt;div style="clear:both;"&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</description></item><item><title>Re:   Has/have</title><link>http://www.englishforums.com/English/HasHave/grzlc/post.htm#502760</link><pubDate>Sat, 19 Apr 2008 20:22:35 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="true">946f00bb-57d3-4b7b-a9a2-059b5341af52:502760</guid><dc:creator>Doll</dc:creator><slash:comments>3</slash:comments><comments>http://www.englishforums.com/English/HasHave/grzlc/post.htm#502760</comments><wfw:commentRss>http://www.englishforums.com/English/comments12-502760.xml</wfw:commentRss><description>&lt;p&gt;Thank you Kooyeen and Yoong Liat,&amp;nbsp;I understood it.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;div style="clear:both;"&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</description></item><item><title>Re:  Has/have</title><link>http://www.englishforums.com/English/HasHave/grzkr/post.htm#502741</link><pubDate>Sat, 19 Apr 2008 18:14:17 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="true">946f00bb-57d3-4b7b-a9a2-059b5341af52:502741</guid><dc:creator>Yoong Liat</dc:creator><slash:comments>4</slash:comments><comments>http://www.englishforums.com/English/HasHave/grzkr/post.htm#502741</comments><wfw:commentRss>http://www.englishforums.com/English/comments12-502741.xml</wfw:commentRss><description>&lt;p&gt;Hi Doll&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;em&gt;... English is one of the languages that &lt;strong&gt;has/have&lt;/strong&gt; many speakers.&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;em&gt;... English is one of the &lt;strong&gt;languages that&lt;/strong&gt; &lt;strong&gt;have&lt;/strong&gt; many speakers.&lt;/em&gt; ( The verb should agree with the noun &amp;#39;languages&amp;#39;.)&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;English is not the only language that has many speakers. Other languages also have many speakers.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;My reply&amp;nbsp;in the earlier post is &amp;#39;Grammatically &lt;em&gt;have&lt;/em&gt; should be used.&amp;#39;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;I think the sentence should be rephrased as: Besides other languages, English is spoken by many people.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;I hope my explanation enables you to understand why &amp;#39;have&amp;#39; slhould be used.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;div style="clear:both;"&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</description></item><item><title>Re: Has/have</title><link>http://www.englishforums.com/English/HasHave/grzhc/post.htm#502692</link><pubDate>Sat, 19 Apr 2008 15:24:19 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="true">946f00bb-57d3-4b7b-a9a2-059b5341af52:502692</guid><dc:creator>Kooyeen</dc:creator><slash:comments>5</slash:comments><comments>http://www.englishforums.com/English/HasHave/grzhc/post.htm#502692</comments><wfw:commentRss>http://www.englishforums.com/English/comments12-502692.xml</wfw:commentRss><description>Hi,&lt;br /&gt;&amp;quot;have&amp;quot; is the &amp;quot;prescriptively correct&amp;quot; one, because it actually and grammatically refers to &amp;quot;languages&amp;quot;.&lt;br /&gt;Now, the fact is that a lot of native speakers use the singular in those kinds of structures, because they make the verb agree with what comes before &amp;quot;one of&amp;quot;. &lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;The advice is: use the plural when you feel you will be judged on strict grammar rules (=&amp;nbsp; ESL Tests), otherwise use either one, depending on what you have in mind, what you are thinking of.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Venusian is one of the &lt;em&gt;&lt;strong&gt;languages&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/em&gt; that &lt;em&gt;&lt;strong&gt;don&amp;#39;t &lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/em&gt;have the subjunctive. --&amp;gt; You are thinking of the languages that don&amp;#39;t have the subjunctive, and Venusian is one of them.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;em&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Venusian&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/em&gt; is one of the languages that &lt;em&gt;&lt;strong&gt;doesn&amp;#39;t &lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/em&gt;have the subjunctive. --&amp;gt; You are thinking that Venusian doesn&amp;#39;t have the subjunctive, along with other languages.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;img src="http://www.englishforums.com/emoticons/emotion-1.gif" alt="Smile" title="Smile" /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Oops, that&amp;#39;s true for American English... I don&amp;#39;t know if you are interested in BrE.&lt;div style="clear:both;"&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</description></item><item><title>Re:  Has/have</title><link>http://www.englishforums.com/English/HasHave/grzdj/post.htm#502631</link><pubDate>Sat, 19 Apr 2008 13:43:56 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="true">946f00bb-57d3-4b7b-a9a2-059b5341af52:502631</guid><dc:creator>Doll</dc:creator><slash:comments>5</slash:comments><comments>http://www.englishforums.com/English/HasHave/grzdj/post.htm#502631</comments><wfw:commentRss>http://www.englishforums.com/English/comments12-502631.xml</wfw:commentRss><description>&lt;p&gt;Ooh! I am confused a bit. We only refer to English, don&amp;#39;t we? Then, why don&amp;#39;t we use &amp;quot;has&amp;quot;?&lt;/p&gt;&lt;div style="clear:both;"&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</description></item><item><title>Re: Has/have</title><link>http://www.englishforums.com/English/HasHave/grzcg/post.htm#502611</link><pubDate>Sat, 19 Apr 2008 12:10:59 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="true">946f00bb-57d3-4b7b-a9a2-059b5341af52:502611</guid><dc:creator>Yoong Liat</dc:creator><slash:comments>6</slash:comments><comments>http://www.englishforums.com/English/HasHave/grzcg/post.htm#502611</comments><wfw:commentRss>http://www.englishforums.com/English/comments12-502611.xml</wfw:commentRss><description>&lt;p&gt;&lt;BLOCKQUOTE&gt;&lt;div&gt;&lt;img src="/Themes/englishforums/images/icon-quote.gif"&gt; &lt;strong&gt;Liveinjapan&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;div&gt; 
&lt;p&gt;&lt;em&gt;Among them English is one of the languages that &lt;strong&gt;has/have&lt;/strong&gt; many speakers.&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;I think &lt;em&gt;have&lt;/em&gt; is a correct choice but is &lt;em&gt;has&lt;/em&gt; also possible? &lt;strong&gt;(No. Grammatically &amp;#39;have&amp;#39; should be used.)&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Thanks&lt;br /&gt;LiJ&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;/BLOCKQUOTE&gt;&lt;div style="clear:both;"&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</description></item><item><title>Has/have</title><link>http://www.englishforums.com/English/HasHave/grzcv/post.htm</link><pubDate>Sat, 19 Apr 2008 12:04:56 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="true">946f00bb-57d3-4b7b-a9a2-059b5341af52:502609</guid><dc:creator>Liveinjapan</dc:creator><slash:comments>7</slash:comments><comments>http://www.englishforums.com/English/HasHave/grzcv/post.htm</comments><wfw:commentRss>http://www.englishforums.com/English/comments12-502609.xml</wfw:commentRss><description>&lt;p&gt;&lt;em&gt;Among them English is one of the languages that &lt;strong&gt;has/have&lt;/strong&gt; many speakers.&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;I think &lt;em&gt;have&lt;/em&gt; is a correct choice but is &lt;em&gt;has&lt;/em&gt; also possible?&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Thanks&lt;br /&gt;LiJ&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;div style="clear:both;"&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</description></item></channel></rss>