<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" ?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/" xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"><channel><title>ESL General English Grammar Questions</title><link>http://www.englishforums.com/English/GeneralEnglishGrammarQuestions/Forum12.htm</link><description>Ask your questions on grammar and get your sentence checked. We answer lots of different types of general English grammar questions here.</description><dc:language>en</dc:language><generator>CSMOD (Build: 3125.9045)</generator><item><title>Re: what for?</title><link>http://www.englishforums.com/English/WhatFor/gcddj/post.htm#511879</link><pubDate>Sat, 10 May 2008 01:59:24 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="true">946f00bb-57d3-4b7b-a9a2-059b5341af52:511879</guid><dc:creator>NL888</dc:creator><slash:comments>0</slash:comments><comments>http://www.englishforums.com/English/WhatFor/gcddj/post.htm#511879</comments><wfw:commentRss>http://www.englishforums.com/English/comments12-511879.xml</wfw:commentRss><description>&lt;p&gt;&amp;nbsp;Thanks Avangi.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&amp;nbsp;No wonder reading your first post added to my puzzling with more confusion. But thankfully&amp;nbsp;I now&amp;nbsp;got it clearly.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;div style="clear:both;"&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</description></item><item><title>Re: what for?</title><link>http://www.englishforums.com/English/WhatFor/gcdcl/post.htm#511864</link><pubDate>Sat, 10 May 2008 00:03:09 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="true">946f00bb-57d3-4b7b-a9a2-059b5341af52:511864</guid><dc:creator>Avangi</dc:creator><slash:comments>0</slash:comments><comments>http://www.englishforums.com/English/WhatFor/gcdcl/post.htm#511864</comments><wfw:commentRss>http://www.englishforums.com/English/comments12-511864.xml</wfw:commentRss><description>&lt;p&gt;Hi NL888,&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;I guess I was in too much of a hurry.&amp;nbsp; The 24 - 32 weeks was not the duration of the pregnancies at the time of the cesarean, as I first understood, but rather the points where the glucose tolerance tests were performed.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;I now must assume that an independent source of standardized data was used to determine where the babies in the study fit in, in terms of birth weight.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Baby number 15,297 had a birth weight of six pounds two ounces. He was delivered after 33 weeks in the womb.&amp;nbsp; We look on a standard chart to see how the weights run for babies who are delivered at this particular gestational age (33 weeks.)&amp;nbsp; We find that ten percent of &lt;strong&gt;all&lt;/strong&gt; babies ever recorded for this particular gestational age weighed six pounds or over at birth. So our baby belongs to the group who had birth weights above the 90th percentile for &lt;strong&gt;his&lt;/strong&gt; particular gestational age.&amp;nbsp; &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Sorry for the error.&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp; -&amp;nbsp; A.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;div style="clear:both;"&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</description></item><item><title>Re: what for?</title><link>http://www.englishforums.com/English/WhatFor/gcbqk/post.htm#511523</link><pubDate>Fri, 09 May 2008 06:47:19 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="true">946f00bb-57d3-4b7b-a9a2-059b5341af52:511523</guid><dc:creator>NL888</dc:creator><slash:comments>0</slash:comments><comments>http://www.englishforums.com/English/WhatFor/gcbqk/post.htm#511523</comments><wfw:commentRss>http://www.englishforums.com/English/comments12-511523.xml</wfw:commentRss><description>&lt;p&gt;Thank you Avangi.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&amp;nbsp;I&amp;#39;d wait until some one else replies the other questions.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;div style="clear:both;"&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</description></item><item><title>Re: what for?</title><link>http://www.englishforums.com/English/WhatFor/gcbzj/post.htm#511335</link><pubDate>Thu, 08 May 2008 18:07:03 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="true">946f00bb-57d3-4b7b-a9a2-059b5341af52:511335</guid><dc:creator>Avangi</dc:creator><slash:comments>0</slash:comments><comments>http://www.englishforums.com/English/WhatFor/gcbzj/post.htm#511335</comments><wfw:commentRss>http://www.englishforums.com/English/comments12-511335.xml</wfw:commentRss><description>&lt;p&gt;&lt;BLOCKQUOTE&gt;&lt;div&gt;&lt;img src="/Themes/englishforums/images/icon-quote.gif"&gt; &lt;strong&gt;NL888&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;div&gt; &lt;span&gt;3) What does &amp;quot;birth weight above the&amp;nbsp;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;span&gt;90th percentile for gestational age&amp;quot; mean?&amp;nbsp;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;/BLOCKQUOTE&gt;Normal human gestation period is 9 months.&amp;nbsp; These are all cesareans @ between 24 and 32 weeks.&amp;nbsp; If you plot the birth weights of all the babies, either by number of days or number of weeks, and look at all the weights for, let&amp;#39;s say, 29 weeks; and arrange them in order of magnitude, and then take the top ten percent of those; then &lt;strong&gt;those&lt;/strong&gt; babies would have birth weights above the 90th percentile of all the babies with a gestation period of 29 weeks.&amp;nbsp; If you repeated this process for all the babies born after a particular number of weeks in the womb, then all of them together would be the group you&amp;#39;re looking for.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Sorry, I was going to do all, but I have an appointment.&amp;nbsp; - A.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Edit.&amp;nbsp; You wouldn&amp;#39;t actually have to &lt;strong&gt;&lt;em&gt;&lt;u&gt;plot&lt;/u&gt;&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/strong&gt; them on a graph (but you could).&amp;nbsp; You could &lt;strong&gt;&lt;em&gt;&lt;u&gt;sort&lt;/u&gt;&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/strong&gt; them according to number of weeks in the womb, and then sort each of those sub groups according to magnitude, and then take the top 10 percent of each subgroup.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;div style="clear:both;"&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</description></item><item><title>what for?</title><link>http://www.englishforums.com/English/WhatFor/gcbcg/post.htm</link><pubDate>Thu, 08 May 2008 15:20:24 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="true">946f00bb-57d3-4b7b-a9a2-059b5341af52:511281</guid><dc:creator>NL888</dc:creator><slash:comments>0</slash:comments><comments>http://www.englishforums.com/English/WhatFor/gcbcg/post.htm</comments><wfw:commentRss>http://www.englishforums.com/English/comments12-511281.xml</wfw:commentRss><description>&lt;p&gt;&amp;nbsp;The following context is about medicine research, a bit hard to read. But what I need most is your grammatical instruction:&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&amp;nbsp; &lt;span id="text11786733"&gt;&lt;font&gt;&lt;b&gt;Hyperglycemia and Adverse Pregnancy Outcomes&lt;/b&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;The HAPO Study Cooperative Research Group &lt;br /&gt;May 8, 2008 &lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;b&gt;ABSTRACT&lt;/b&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Background It is controversial whether maternal hyperglycemia less severe than that in diabetes mellitus is associated with increased risks of adverse pregnancy outcomes. &lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Methods A total of 25,505 pregnant women at 15 centers in nine countries underwent 75-g oral glucose-tolerance testing at 24 to 32 weeks of gestation. &lt;font color="#ff0000"&gt;Data remained blinded&lt;/font&gt; if the fasting plasma glucose level was 105 mg per deciliter (5.8 mmol per liter) or less and the 2-hour plasma glucose level was 200 mg per deciliter (11.1 mmol per liter) or less. &lt;font color="#ff0000"&gt;Primary outcomes were birth weight above the 90th percentile for gestational age, primary cesarean delivery, clinically diagnosed neonatal hypoglycemia,&lt;/font&gt; and cord-blood serum C-peptide level above the 90th percentile. Secondary outcomes were delivery before 37 weeks of gestation, shoulder dystocia or birth injury, need for intensive neonatal care, hyperbilirubinemia, and preeclampsia. &lt;/font&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;span&gt;&lt;font&gt;&lt;h2 class="wh"&gt;&lt;/h2&gt;=&lt;/font&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;span&gt;1)&amp;nbsp; The data remained blinded? Reminded blinded &lt;font color="#0000ff"&gt;for&lt;/font&gt; who? Remained blinded for investigators/for performers of the study?&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;span&gt;2) Does the primary outcome refer to the first time outcome of oral &lt;/span&gt;&lt;span&gt;glucose-tolerance testing? &lt;/span&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;span&gt;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp; Primary outcomes were:&amp;nbsp; (1)&amp;nbsp;birth weight above the &lt;/span&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;span&gt;90th percentile for gestational age, (2) primary &lt;/span&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;span&gt;cesarean delivery, (3) clinically diagnosed neonatal &lt;/span&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;span&gt;hypoglycemia, and (4) cord-blood serum C-peptide level &lt;/span&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;span&gt;above the 90th percentile?&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;span&gt;3) What does &amp;quot;birth weight above the&amp;nbsp;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;span&gt;90th percentile for gestational age&amp;quot; mean?&amp;nbsp;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;span&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;span&gt;&lt;font&gt;&lt;/font&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;span&gt;&lt;font&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;/font&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;div style="clear:both;"&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</description></item></channel></rss>