<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" ?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="http://www.englishforums.com/utility/FeedStylesheets/rss.xsl" media="screen"?><rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/" xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"><channel><title>ESL General English Grammar Questions</title><link>http://www.englishforums.com/English/GeneralEnglishGrammarQuestions/Forum12.htm</link><description>Ask your questions on grammar and get your sentence checked. We answer lots of different types of general English grammar questions here.</description><dc:language>en</dc:language><generator>CSMOD (Build: 3273.32735)</generator><item><title>Re: "equanimous nature"?</title><link>http://www.englishforums.com/English/EquanimousNature/2/gcxcj/Post.htm#515041</link><pubDate>Sat, 17 May 2008 23:49:08 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">946f00bb-57d3-4b7b-a9a2-059b5341af52:515041</guid><dc:creator>Avangi</dc:creator><slash:comments>6</slash:comments><comments>http://www.englishforums.com/English/EquanimousNature/2/gcxcj/Post.htm#515041</comments><wfw:commentRss>http://www.englishforums.com/English/comments12-515041.xml</wfw:commentRss><description>&lt;p&gt;But on the other hand, I&amp;#39;m beginning to realize that &amp;quot;equanimous, steadfast, unrelated&amp;quot; is probably what you meant to convey.&amp;nbsp; &amp;quot;Unrelated&amp;quot; is just unfortunate, because it lacks the pizzazz of the other two words.&amp;nbsp; I guess you mean unmoved or uneffected by man&amp;#39;s concerns.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;div style="clear:both;"&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</description></item><item><title>Re: "equanimous nature"?</title><link>http://www.englishforums.com/English/EquanimousNature/2/gcnpw/Post.htm#514972</link><pubDate>Sat, 17 May 2008 18:51:01 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">946f00bb-57d3-4b7b-a9a2-059b5341af52:514972</guid><dc:creator>Anonymous</dc:creator><slash:comments>5</slash:comments><comments>http://www.englishforums.com/English/EquanimousNature/2/gcnpw/Post.htm#514972</comments><wfw:commentRss>http://www.englishforums.com/English/comments12-514972.xml</wfw:commentRss><description>Oh yes, &amp;quot;unrelenting&amp;quot; probably fits better than &amp;quot;unrelated&amp;quot;, thanks!&amp;nbsp;&lt;div style="clear:both;"&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</description></item><item><title>Re: "equanimous nature"?</title><link>http://www.englishforums.com/English/EquanimousNature/2/gcnmn/Post.htm#514926</link><pubDate>Sat, 17 May 2008 16:11:17 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">946f00bb-57d3-4b7b-a9a2-059b5341af52:514926</guid><dc:creator>Avangi</dc:creator><slash:comments>7</slash:comments><comments>http://www.englishforums.com/English/EquanimousNature/2/gcnmn/Post.htm#514926</comments><wfw:commentRss>http://www.englishforums.com/English/comments12-514926.xml</wfw:commentRss><description>&lt;p&gt;Hi, Anon,&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;I read your line five times before I realized your word is &amp;quot;unrelated.&amp;quot;&amp;nbsp; I read it as &amp;quot;unrelenting,&amp;quot; because of the context.&amp;nbsp; Do you really mean, &amp;quot;unrelated&amp;quot;??&amp;nbsp; It doesn&amp;#39;t seem very &amp;quot;confrontational.&amp;quot;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&amp;nbsp; - A.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;div style="clear:both;"&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</description></item><item><title>Re:  "equanimous nature"?</title><link>http://www.englishforums.com/English/EquanimousNature/gcnmk/post.htm#514923</link><pubDate>Sat, 17 May 2008 16:04:48 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">946f00bb-57d3-4b7b-a9a2-059b5341af52:514923</guid><dc:creator>Anonymous</dc:creator><slash:comments>3</slash:comments><comments>http://www.englishforums.com/English/EquanimousNature/gcnmk/post.htm#514923</comments><wfw:commentRss>http://www.englishforums.com/English/comments12-514923.xml</wfw:commentRss><description>Hm, if &amp;quot;equanimous&amp;quot; is that rare, maybe &amp;quot;imperturbable&amp;quot; would fit as well?&lt;div style="clear:both;"&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</description></item><item><title>Re:  "equanimous nature"?</title><link>http://www.englishforums.com/English/EquanimousNature/gcnmh/post.htm#514920</link><pubDate>Sat, 17 May 2008 15:57:25 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">946f00bb-57d3-4b7b-a9a2-059b5341af52:514920</guid><dc:creator>Avangi</dc:creator><slash:comments>4</slash:comments><comments>http://www.englishforums.com/English/EquanimousNature/gcnmh/post.htm#514920</comments><wfw:commentRss>http://www.englishforums.com/English/comments12-514920.xml</wfw:commentRss><description>&lt;p&gt;Before you relax totally, your sentence needs a verb.&amp;nbsp; (unless its a line of verse)&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;I&amp;#39;ve never heard or seen this word before (only the noun version).&amp;nbsp; Thanks for a new experience.&amp;nbsp; Go for it!&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;--A.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;div style="clear:both;"&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</description></item><item><title>Re:  "equanimous nature"?</title><link>http://www.englishforums.com/English/EquanimousNature/gcnmv/post.htm#514917</link><pubDate>Sat, 17 May 2008 15:45:56 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">946f00bb-57d3-4b7b-a9a2-059b5341af52:514917</guid><dc:creator>Anonymous</dc:creator><slash:comments>5</slash:comments><comments>http://www.englishforums.com/English/EquanimousNature/gcnmv/post.htm#514917</comments><wfw:commentRss>http://www.englishforums.com/English/comments12-514917.xml</wfw:commentRss><description>Thanks. Then it&amp;#39;s alright, because it&amp;#39;s just the description of a dramatic instrumental song, the dark side of romanticism.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;div style="clear:both;"&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</description></item><item><title>Re:  "equanimous nature"?</title><link>http://www.englishforums.com/English/EquanimousNature/gcnlr/post.htm#514896</link><pubDate>Sat, 17 May 2008 15:21:55 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">946f00bb-57d3-4b7b-a9a2-059b5341af52:514896</guid><dc:creator>Marius Hancu</dc:creator><slash:comments>6</slash:comments><comments>http://www.englishforums.com/English/EquanimousNature/gcnlr/post.htm#514896</comments><wfw:commentRss>http://www.englishforums.com/English/comments12-514896.xml</wfw:commentRss><description>&amp;nbsp;If this is your writing, I&amp;#39;d say it&amp;#39;s too heavy and pretentious, but perhaps we need more context. Relax. &lt;br /&gt;&lt;div style="clear:both;"&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</description></item><item><title>Re:  "equanimous nature"?</title><link>http://www.englishforums.com/English/EquanimousNature/gcnhq/post.htm#514844</link><pubDate>Sat, 17 May 2008 13:00:10 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">946f00bb-57d3-4b7b-a9a2-059b5341af52:514844</guid><dc:creator>Anonymous</dc:creator><slash:comments>7</slash:comments><comments>http://www.englishforums.com/English/EquanimousNature/gcnhq/post.htm#514844</comments><wfw:commentRss>http://www.englishforums.com/English/comments12-514844.xml</wfw:commentRss><description>Yes, but is it OK to use it in this context?&amp;nbsp;&lt;div style="clear:both;"&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</description></item><item><title>Re: "equanimous nature"?</title><link>http://www.englishforums.com/English/EquanimousNature/gcmnm/post.htm#514653</link><pubDate>Sat, 17 May 2008 01:33:13 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">946f00bb-57d3-4b7b-a9a2-059b5341af52:514653</guid><dc:creator>Feebs11</dc:creator><slash:comments>8</slash:comments><comments>http://www.englishforums.com/English/EquanimousNature/gcmnm/post.htm#514653</comments><wfw:commentRss>http://www.englishforums.com/English/comments12-514653.xml</wfw:commentRss><description>&amp;nbsp;To be equanimous is to have a calm nature.&lt;div style="clear:both;"&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</description></item><item><title>"equanimous nature"?</title><link>http://www.englishforums.com/English/EquanimousNature/gcmnb/post.htm</link><pubDate>Sat, 17 May 2008 00:56:40 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">946f00bb-57d3-4b7b-a9a2-059b5341af52:514642</guid><dc:creator>Anonymous</dc:creator><slash:comments>9</slash:comments><comments>http://www.englishforums.com/English/EquanimousNature/gcmnb/post.htm</comments><wfw:commentRss>http://www.englishforums.com/English/comments12-514642.xml</wfw:commentRss><description>&amp;quot;The cradle of life confronting man in an equanimous, steadfast, unrelated way.&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Supposed that &amp;quot;nature&amp;quot; is seen poetical as a &amp;quot;living character&amp;quot;, it can be &amp;quot;equanimous&amp;quot;?&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;div style="clear:both;"&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</description></item></channel></rss>