<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" ?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/" xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"><channel><title>ESL General English Grammar Questions</title><link>http://www.englishforums.com/English/GeneralEnglishGrammarQuestions/Forum12.htm</link><description>Ask your questions on grammar and get your sentence checked. We answer lots of different types of general English grammar questions here.</description><dc:language>en</dc:language><generator>CSMOD (Build: 3191.21962)</generator><item><title>Re: the baby couldn't survive</title><link>http://www.englishforums.com/English/TheBabyCouldntSurvive/gcnvl/post.htm#514788</link><pubDate>Sat, 17 May 2008 10:49:12 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="true">946f00bb-57d3-4b7b-a9a2-059b5341af52:514788</guid><dc:creator>Marius Hancu</dc:creator><slash:comments>0</slash:comments><comments>http://www.englishforums.com/English/TheBabyCouldntSurvive/gcnvl/post.htm#514788</comments><wfw:commentRss>http://www.englishforums.com/English/comments12-514788.xml</wfw:commentRss><description>I don&amp;#39;t think the original is quite correct. Try, in past time: &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;i&gt;&lt;b&gt;Were it not &lt;/b&gt;for the doctor&amp;#39;s urgent operation, the baby &lt;b&gt;couldn&amp;#39;t have survived.&amp;nbsp;&lt;/b&gt;&lt;/i&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;or, even better, showing more clearly the sequence of actions: &amp;nbsp;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;i&gt;&lt;b&gt;Had it not BEEN&lt;/b&gt; for the doctor&amp;#39;s urgent operation, the baby &lt;b&gt;couldn&amp;#39;t have survived. &lt;/b&gt;&lt;/i&gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Forget about classifications (conditional 1, etc). &lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Learn the correct ones by listening to their flow.&amp;nbsp;  &lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;We have a contrary-to-fact situation in the above, and that normally requires &amp;quot;have&amp;quot; in the 2nd part. &lt;br /&gt;

&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;div style="clear:both;"&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</description></item><item><title>the baby couldn't survive</title><link>http://www.englishforums.com/English/TheBabyCouldntSurvive/gcmqh/post.htm</link><pubDate>Sat, 17 May 2008 04:52:36 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="true">946f00bb-57d3-4b7b-a9a2-059b5341af52:514699</guid><dc:creator>New2grammar</dc:creator><slash:comments>1</slash:comments><comments>http://www.englishforums.com/English/TheBabyCouldntSurvive/gcmqh/post.htm</comments><wfw:commentRss>http://www.englishforums.com/English/comments12-514699.xml</wfw:commentRss><description>Were it not for the doctor&amp;#39;s urgent operation, the baby couldn&amp;#39;t survive&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;I borrowed this sentence from Angliholic.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;One thing that bothers me about this sentence is I would never use it in Conditional #2. Instead, Conditional #3 would be perfect.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Had it not for the doctor&amp;#39;s urgent operation, the baby couldn&amp;#39;t have survived.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;I wonder in what context, the Conditional #2 would be used. Could you provide me with one?&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Thanks in advance!&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;div style="clear:both;"&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</description></item></channel></rss>