<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" ?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="http://www.englishforums.com/utility/FeedStylesheets/rss.xsl" media="screen"?><rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/" xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"><channel><title>ESL General English Grammar Questions</title><link>http://www.englishforums.com/English/GeneralEnglishGrammarQuestions/Forum12.htm</link><description>Ask your questions on grammar and get your sentence checked. We answer lots of different types of general English grammar questions here.</description><dc:language>en</dc:language><generator>CSMOD (Build: 3273.32735)</generator><item><title>Cool!</title><link>http://www.englishforums.com/English/Cool/knln/post.htm#53087</link><pubDate>Mon, 01 Nov 2004 16:29:38 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">946f00bb-57d3-4b7b-a9a2-059b5341af52:53087</guid><dc:creator>Jobb</dc:creator><slash:comments>0</slash:comments><comments>http://www.englishforums.com/English/Cool/knln/post.htm#53087</comments><wfw:commentRss>http://www.englishforums.com/English/comments12-53087.xml</wfw:commentRss><description>&lt;br /&gt;  Thanks for the confirmation MM.</description></item><item><title>Re: Class</title><link>http://www.englishforums.com/English/Class/knwd/post.htm#53026</link><pubDate>Mon, 01 Nov 2004 07:22:28 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">946f00bb-57d3-4b7b-a9a2-059b5341af52:53026</guid><dc:creator>Mister Micawber</dc:creator><slash:comments>1</slash:comments><comments>http://www.englishforums.com/English/Class/knwd/post.htm#53026</comments><wfw:commentRss>http://www.englishforums.com/English/comments12-53026.xml</wfw:commentRss><description>&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;(1)  "I suspect that the class actually refers to 'students' " --  Yes indeed.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;(2)  "the 'diet' refers to 'the watered down training that originally was rigid' " -- Yes, but 'watered down' means too weakened, so your comment " 'we' no more have to water down a rigid training" should perhaps read " 'we' should no more water down a rigid training, but rather stiffen the training".&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;</description></item><item><title>Class</title><link>http://www.englishforums.com/English/Class/knzw/post.htm</link><pubDate>Sun, 31 Oct 2004 23:38:53 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">946f00bb-57d3-4b7b-a9a2-059b5341af52:52980</guid><dc:creator>Jobb</dc:creator><slash:comments>2</slash:comments><comments>http://www.englishforums.com/English/Class/knzw/post.htm</comments><wfw:commentRss>http://www.englishforums.com/English/comments12-52980.xml</wfw:commentRss><description>Context:&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;   We have watered down a rigid training . . . until we now have an educational diet in many of our public high schools that nourishes neither the classes nor the masses&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;     ===================&lt;br /&gt;   Class = A social stratum whose members share certain economic, social, or cultural characteristics?&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;   I suspect that the class actually refers to 'students".&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;    Regarding the logic relationship between "a rigid training" and "an educational diel".&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;    Because "we" now have an educational diet, so 'we" no more have to water down a rigid training. Still, in many of our public high schools  the diet nourishes neither the classes nor the masses&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;   That is, the "diet" refers to "the watered down training that originally was rigid".&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;     Am I on the right track?</description></item></channel></rss>