<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" ?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="http://www.englishforums.com/utility/FeedStylesheets/rss.xsl" media="screen"?><rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/" xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"><channel><title>ESL General English Grammar Questions</title><link>http://www.englishforums.com/English/GeneralEnglishGrammarQuestions/Forum12.htm</link><description>Ask your questions on grammar and get your sentence checked. We answer lots of different types of general English grammar questions here.</description><dc:language>en</dc:language><generator>CSMOD (Build: 3273.32735)</generator><item><title>Re: after the fact</title><link>http://www.englishforums.com/English/AfterTheFact/2/ghzdm/Post.htm#537025</link><pubDate>Sat, 05 Jul 2008 14:10:33 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">946f00bb-57d3-4b7b-a9a2-059b5341af52:537025</guid><dc:creator>Avangi</dc:creator><slash:comments>3</slash:comments><comments>http://www.englishforums.com/English/AfterTheFact/2/ghzdm/Post.htm#537025</comments><wfw:commentRss>http://www.englishforums.com/English/comments12-537025.xml</wfw:commentRss><description>No bother at all.&amp;nbsp; If you hadn&amp;#39;t taken the trouble to find the reference, we&amp;#39;d still be guessing.&amp;nbsp; People don&amp;#39;t necessarily take care with their English when posting on a technical site.&amp;nbsp; Thanks for following through.&amp;nbsp; -&amp;nbsp; A.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Edit.&amp;nbsp; BTW, &amp;quot;nigh&amp;quot; is an old word for &amp;quot;near.&amp;quot;&amp;nbsp; &amp;quot;Nigh impossible&amp;quot; means &amp;quot;close to impossible.&amp;quot;&amp;nbsp; I&amp;#39;m guessing that Desire took it as a typo for &amp;quot;high&amp;quot; and hypercorrected.&lt;div style="clear:both;"&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</description></item><item><title>Re: after the fact</title><link>http://www.englishforums.com/English/AfterTheFact/2/ghvqj/Post.htm#536954</link><pubDate>Sat, 05 Jul 2008 11:23:23 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">946f00bb-57d3-4b7b-a9a2-059b5341af52:536954</guid><dc:creator>Ant_222</dc:creator><slash:comments>5</slash:comments><comments>http://www.englishforums.com/English/AfterTheFact/2/ghvqj/Post.htm#536954</comments><wfw:commentRss>http://www.englishforums.com/English/comments12-536954.xml</wfw:commentRss><description>&lt;p&gt;Hi, Avagni.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;I fully agree with you, but since the post is about a video file, why there&amp;#39;s no article before &amp;quot;video&amp;quot;? I have no idea...&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Sorry for bothering...&lt;br /&gt;Anton&lt;/p&gt;&lt;div style="clear:both;"&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</description></item><item><title>Re: after the fact</title><link>http://www.englishforums.com/English/AfterTheFact/2/ghvnh/Post.htm#536901</link><pubDate>Sat, 05 Jul 2008 07:10:34 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">946f00bb-57d3-4b7b-a9a2-059b5341af52:536901</guid><dc:creator>Avangi</dc:creator><slash:comments>7</slash:comments><comments>http://www.englishforums.com/English/AfterTheFact/2/ghvnh/Post.htm#536901</comments><wfw:commentRss>http://www.englishforums.com/English/comments12-536901.xml</wfw:commentRss><description>&lt;BLOCKQUOTE&gt;&lt;div&gt;&lt;img src="/Themes/englishforums/images/icon-quote.gif"&gt; &lt;strong&gt;Desireandlove&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;div&gt;&amp;quot;In my experience &lt;strong&gt;&lt;strike&gt;it&amp;#39;f highly&lt;/strike&gt;&lt;/strong&gt; &lt;strong&gt;&lt;span style="COLOR:#00bfbf;"&gt;it&amp;#39;s nigh&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/strong&gt; impossible for you to truly increse the quality of video &lt;strong&gt;after the fact.&amp;quot;&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;/BLOCKQUOTE&gt;Okay, thanks Ant, I have it.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;It seems like the operational term here is &amp;quot;truly,&amp;quot; meaning that &amp;quot;enhancement&amp;quot; is only enhancement and you&amp;#39;re not really &lt;em&gt;&lt;span style="TEXT-DECORATION:underline;"&gt;changing&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/em&gt; anything.&amp;nbsp; (It&amp;#39;s a philosophical argument.)&amp;nbsp; The poster goes on to explain that if you&amp;#39;re smart enough and rich enough you can do it.&amp;nbsp; (Yes, we&amp;#39;re referring to DVD&amp;#39;s.)&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;His ultimate advice is that it&amp;#39;s far better to make a quality file in the first place than to try to repair a bad one.&amp;nbsp; Sounds like good advice.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&amp;nbsp; - A.&lt;div style="clear:both;"&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</description></item><item><title>Re: after the fact</title><link>http://www.englishforums.com/English/AfterTheFact/ghvnd/post.htm#536897</link><pubDate>Sat, 05 Jul 2008 06:53:09 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">946f00bb-57d3-4b7b-a9a2-059b5341af52:536897</guid><dc:creator>Avangi</dc:creator><slash:comments>3</slash:comments><comments>http://www.englishforums.com/English/AfterTheFact/ghvnd/post.htm#536897</comments><wfw:commentRss>http://www.englishforums.com/English/comments12-536897.xml</wfw:commentRss><description>Hi Ant,&lt;br /&gt;I tried your reference, and it was a thread entitled, &amp;quot;Videogamer wanted.&amp;quot;&amp;nbsp; I couldn&amp;#39;t seem to find the quote.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Rgdz,&amp;nbsp; - A.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Edit.&amp;nbsp; Woops!&amp;nbsp; Sorry, I got the last digit wrong!&lt;div style="clear:both;"&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</description></item><item><title>Re: after the fact</title><link>http://www.englishforums.com/English/AfterTheFact/ghvhn/post.htm#536805</link><pubDate>Fri, 04 Jul 2008 22:25:16 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">946f00bb-57d3-4b7b-a9a2-059b5341af52:536805</guid><dc:creator>Ant_222</dc:creator><slash:comments>4</slash:comments><comments>http://www.englishforums.com/English/AfterTheFact/ghvhn/post.htm#536805</comments><wfw:commentRss>http://www.englishforums.com/English/comments12-536805.xml</wfw:commentRss><description>And here&amp;#39;s the context, by which I&amp;#39;d even suppose the indefinite article should have been used before &amp;quot;video&amp;quot;:&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;http://forum.digital-digest.com/showthread.php?t=86179&lt;br /&gt;&lt;div style="clear:both;"&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</description></item><item><title>Re: after the fact</title><link>http://www.englishforums.com/English/AfterTheFact/ghdqv/post.htm#536660</link><pubDate>Fri, 04 Jul 2008 15:16:09 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">946f00bb-57d3-4b7b-a9a2-059b5341af52:536660</guid><dc:creator>Avangi</dc:creator><slash:comments>5</slash:comments><comments>http://www.englishforums.com/English/AfterTheFact/ghdqv/post.htm#536660</comments><wfw:commentRss>http://www.englishforums.com/English/comments12-536660.xml</wfw:commentRss><description>Hi Marius,&amp;nbsp; I&amp;#39;m interested in your concept.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;As you say, &amp;quot;&lt;strong&gt;&lt;em&gt;&lt;span style="TEXT-DECORATION:underline;"&gt;the&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/strong&gt; video,&amp;quot; I assume you&amp;#39;re referring to a DVD (disc) or a VCR (tape). I had interpreted the question (absent the article) as referring&amp;nbsp;to the reproduction equipment, and its ability to produce a better image than was &amp;quot;originally&amp;quot; possible.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;I know there are computer programs which can &amp;quot;enhance&amp;quot; the digital file to improve the quality of the image.&amp;nbsp; I don&amp;#39;t know if this is true of analog tapes.&amp;nbsp; I expect the process of &amp;quot;improving&amp;quot; old movie films involves first converting them to digital.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Perhaps the existence of enhancement technology for the file or the reproduction equipment is not relevant.&amp;nbsp; CJ opted to stand with Ant in holding that it can&amp;#39;t be settled without context.&amp;nbsp; (I notice that Ant also wrote &amp;quot;&lt;strong&gt;&lt;em&gt;&lt;span style="text-decoration:underline;"&gt;the&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/strong&gt; video,&amp;quot; as you did.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Anyway, my statement, &amp;quot;The only thing it can possibly mean&amp;quot; was more than a bit extreme.&amp;nbsp; This becomes increasingly clear to me.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Best wishes,&amp;nbsp; - A.&lt;div style="clear:both;"&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</description></item><item><title>Re: after the fact</title><link>http://www.englishforums.com/English/AfterTheFact/ghdmz/post.htm#536593</link><pubDate>Fri, 04 Jul 2008 11:23:19 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">946f00bb-57d3-4b7b-a9a2-059b5341af52:536593</guid><dc:creator>Marius Hancu</dc:creator><slash:comments>6</slash:comments><comments>http://www.englishforums.com/English/AfterTheFact/ghdmz/post.htm#536593</comments><wfw:commentRss>http://www.englishforums.com/English/comments12-536593.xml</wfw:commentRss><description>&amp;nbsp;&lt;b&gt;after the time&lt;/b&gt; of &lt;b&gt;capturing, originally producing&lt;/b&gt; the video&lt;div style="clear:both;"&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</description></item><item><title>Re: after the fact</title><link>http://www.englishforums.com/English/AfterTheFact/ghdhj/post.htm#536512</link><pubDate>Fri, 04 Jul 2008 02:53:52 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">946f00bb-57d3-4b7b-a9a2-059b5341af52:536512</guid><dc:creator>Avangi</dc:creator><slash:comments>7</slash:comments><comments>http://www.englishforums.com/English/AfterTheFact/ghdhj/post.htm#536512</comments><wfw:commentRss>http://www.englishforums.com/English/comments12-536512.xml</wfw:commentRss><description>I think some native speakers have a habit of using &amp;quot;after the fact&amp;quot; in a smart-alec-y way, leaving the listener to figure it out.&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp; (Doesn&amp;#39;t make it right.)&amp;nbsp;&lt;div style="clear:both;"&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</description></item><item><title>Re: after the fact</title><link>http://www.englishforums.com/English/AfterTheFact/ghdzm/post.htm#536481</link><pubDate>Fri, 04 Jul 2008 01:46:03 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">946f00bb-57d3-4b7b-a9a2-059b5341af52:536481</guid><dc:creator>CalifJim</dc:creator><slash:comments>8</slash:comments><comments>http://www.englishforums.com/English/AfterTheFact/ghdzm/post.htm#536481</comments><wfw:commentRss>http://www.englishforums.com/English/comments12-536481.xml</wfw:commentRss><description>&amp;nbsp;after the fact = after the aforementioned action has been done.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;The sentences which precede this one will tell you which action is being referred to.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;CJ&amp;nbsp;&lt;div style="clear:both;"&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</description></item><item><title>Re: after the fact</title><link>http://www.englishforums.com/English/AfterTheFact/ghdzw/post.htm#536477</link><pubDate>Fri, 04 Jul 2008 01:33:16 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">946f00bb-57d3-4b7b-a9a2-059b5341af52:536477</guid><dc:creator>Avangi</dc:creator><slash:comments>9</slash:comments><comments>http://www.englishforums.com/English/AfterTheFact/ghdzw/post.htm#536477</comments><wfw:commentRss>http://www.englishforums.com/English/comments12-536477.xml</wfw:commentRss><description>&lt;BLOCKQUOTE&gt;&lt;div&gt;&lt;img src="/Themes/englishforums/images/icon-quote.gif"&gt; &lt;strong&gt;Desireandlove&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;div&gt;What does &amp;quot;after the fact&amp;quot; means?&lt;/div&gt;&lt;/BLOCKQUOTE&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Hi Joakim,&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;The only thing it can possibly mean in this context, IMHO, is after the fact of manufacture.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;You may fine tune the adjustments which the design provides, but there is nothing you can add, or modify, to improve the quality.&amp;nbsp; (i.e., enhancements)&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;(You man &amp;quot;improve&amp;quot; the memory of your computer by adding chips, or improve the speed by changing the cpu&amp;nbsp; -&amp;nbsp; I think.)&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;I don&amp;#39;t know if the original statement is true, but I believe that&amp;#39;s the intention.&amp;nbsp; I&amp;#39;ll grant you, it&amp;#39;s ambiguous.&amp;nbsp; Could be after the fact of it&amp;#39;s falling out a tenth-story window.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Best wishes,&amp;nbsp; - A.&lt;div style="clear:both;"&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</description></item><item><title>Re: after the fact</title><link>http://www.englishforums.com/English/AfterTheFact/ghddb/post.htm#536436</link><pubDate>Thu, 03 Jul 2008 21:56:29 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">946f00bb-57d3-4b7b-a9a2-059b5341af52:536436</guid><dc:creator>Ant_222</dc:creator><slash:comments>10</slash:comments><comments>http://www.englishforums.com/English/AfterTheFact/ghddb/post.htm#536436</comments><wfw:commentRss>http://www.englishforums.com/English/comments12-536436.xml</wfw:commentRss><description>Without the context, it isn&amp;#39;t clear the completion of what operation on the video is referred to as &amp;quot;the fact&amp;quot;...&lt;div style="clear:both;"&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</description></item><item><title>after the fact</title><link>http://www.englishforums.com/English/AfterTheFact/ghdch/post.htm</link><pubDate>Thu, 03 Jul 2008 21:21:07 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">946f00bb-57d3-4b7b-a9a2-059b5341af52:536425</guid><dc:creator>Desireandlove</dc:creator><slash:comments>11</slash:comments><comments>http://www.englishforums.com/English/AfterTheFact/ghdch/post.htm</comments><wfw:commentRss>http://www.englishforums.com/English/comments12-536425.xml</wfw:commentRss><description>Hi again!&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;I got a sentence here which I do understand, but there&amp;#39;s litte part of the sentence I need explnations on.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&amp;quot;In my experience it&amp;#39;f highly impossible for you to truly increse the quality of video &lt;strong&gt;after the fact.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;br /&gt;What does &amp;quot;after the fact&amp;quot; means?&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Regards, Joakim.&lt;div style="clear:both;"&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</description></item></channel></rss>