<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" ?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/" xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"><channel><title>ESL General English Grammar Questions</title><link>http://www.englishforums.com/English/GeneralEnglishGrammarQuestions/Forum12.htm</link><description>Ask your questions on grammar and get your sentence checked. We answer lots of different types of general English grammar questions here.</description><dc:language>en</dc:language><generator>CSMOD (Build: 3232.18851)</generator><item><title>Re: Use of conditional verb prior to an infinitive clause / object complement</title><link>http://www.englishforums.com/English/ConditionalVerbPriorInfinitive-ClauseObjectComplement/ghzmc/post.htm#537168</link><pubDate>Sat, 05 Jul 2008 22:47:34 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="true">946f00bb-57d3-4b7b-a9a2-059b5341af52:537168</guid><dc:creator>Marius Hancu</dc:creator><slash:comments>0</slash:comments><comments>http://www.englishforums.com/English/ConditionalVerbPriorInfinitive-ClauseObjectComplement/ghzmc/post.htm#537168</comments><wfw:commentRss>http://www.englishforums.com/English/comments12-537168.xml</wfw:commentRss><description>&amp;nbsp;Your sentence is more&amp;nbsp;&lt;b&gt; polite &lt;/b&gt;and as a result much more frequent:&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;font color="#000000"&gt;&lt;b&gt;607&lt;/b&gt; on &lt;b&gt;&amp;quot;I would like for you to go&amp;quot;&lt;/b&gt;&lt;/font&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;a href="http://books.google.com/books?q=%22I+would+like+for+you+to+go%22&amp;amp;btnG=Search+Books" target="_blank" title="http://books.google.com/books?q=%22I+would+like+for+you+to+go%22&amp;amp;btnG=Search+Books"&gt;http://books.google.com/books?q=%22I+would+like+for+you+to+go%22&amp;amp;btnG=Search+Books&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;font color="#000000"&gt;&lt;b&gt;233&lt;/b&gt; on &lt;b&gt;&amp;quot;I&amp;#39;d like for you to go&amp;quot;&lt;/b&gt;&lt;/font&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;a href="http://books.google.com/books?q=%22I%27d+like+for+you+to+go%22&amp;amp;btnG=Search+Books" target="_blank" title="http://books.google.com/books?q=%22I%27d+like+for+you+to+go%22&amp;amp;btnG=Search+Books"&gt;http://books.google.com/books?q=%22I%27d+like+for+you+to+go%22&amp;amp;btnG=Search+Books&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;font color="#000000"&gt;&lt;b&gt;3&lt;/b&gt; on &lt;b&gt;&amp;quot;I like for you to go&amp;quot;&lt;/b&gt;&lt;/font&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&amp;nbsp;Forget about your other considerations, they&amp;#39;re not quite valid. &lt;br /&gt;&lt;div style="clear:both;"&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</description></item><item><title>Use of conditional verb prior to an infinitive clause / object complement</title><link>http://www.englishforums.com/English/ConditionalVerbPriorInfinitive-ClauseObjectComplement/ghzll/post.htm</link><pubDate>Sat, 05 Jul 2008 22:17:48 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="true">946f00bb-57d3-4b7b-a9a2-059b5341af52:537160</guid><dc:creator>Anonymous</dc:creator><slash:comments>1</slash:comments><comments>http://www.englishforums.com/English/ConditionalVerbPriorInfinitive-ClauseObjectComplement/ghzll/post.htm</comments><wfw:commentRss>http://www.englishforums.com/English/comments12-537160.xml</wfw:commentRss><description>Hi all,&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Thanks in advance for your help in answering this question.&amp;nbsp; I&amp;#39;m trying to explain to a non-native English speaker that a certain usage is either incorrect or awkward, but I find myself unable to do so.&amp;nbsp; At this point, I&amp;#39;m just confusing myself in trying to explain it.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;So her construction is:&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&amp;quot;I like for you to go to my friend&amp;#39;s house in three weeks.&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;My correction would be:&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&amp;quot;I &lt;em&gt;would&lt;/em&gt; like for you to go to my friend&amp;#39;s house in three weeks.&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;My reasoning is that including the word &amp;quot;would&amp;quot; allows for a better logical continuity of tenses.&amp;nbsp; I have tried to explain this via continuity of verb tense and the nature of the conditional word &amp;quot;would&amp;quot;-- but I am not a grammarian and my explanations are either imprecise or wholly inaccurate.&amp;nbsp; On that note,&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;1)&amp;nbsp; Is my correction correct?&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;2) Is there a rule which either supports or refutes this correction?&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Kind regards,&lt;br /&gt;A.S.&lt;div style="clear:both;"&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</description></item></channel></rss>