<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" ?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="http://www.englishforums.com/utility/FeedStylesheets/rss.xsl" media="screen"?><rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/" xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"><channel><title>ESL General English Grammar Questions</title><link>http://www.englishforums.com/English/EslGeneralEnglishGrammar-Questions/Forum12.htm</link><description>Ask your questions on grammar and get your sentence checked. We answer lots of different types of general English grammar questions here.
&lt;font color=red&gt;DO NOT post paragraphs and compositions here.  Post them in our &lt;a href="http://www.englishforums.com/English/EssayReportCompositionWriting/Forum9.htm"&gt;&lt;b&gt;Essay, Report and Composition Writing Forum&lt;/b&gt;&lt;/a&gt;.&lt;/font&gt;</description><dc:language>en</dc:language><generator>XMOD (Build: 3607.32596)</generator><item><title>Re: cattle vs fish</title><link>http://www.englishforums.com/English/CattleVsFish/gjcnb/post.htm#546208</link><pubDate>Sat, 23 May 2009 07:13:48 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">946f00bb-57d3-4b7b-a9a2-059b5341af52:546208</guid><dc:creator>New2grammar</dc:creator><slash:comments>0</slash:comments><comments>http://www.englishforums.com/English/CattleVsFish/gjcnb/post.htm#546208</comments><wfw:commentRss>http://www.englishforums.com/English/comments12-546208.xml</wfw:commentRss><description>That makes a lot of sense, thanks, MM.</description></item><item><title>Re: cattle vs fish</title><link>http://www.englishforums.com/English/CattleVsFish/gjcnb/post.htm#546192</link><pubDate>Mon, 23 Mar 2009 08:13:48 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">946f00bb-57d3-4b7b-a9a2-059b5341af52:546192</guid><dc:creator>Mister Micawber</dc:creator><slash:comments>1</slash:comments><comments>http://www.englishforums.com/English/CattleVsFish/gjcnb/post.htm#546192</comments><wfw:commentRss>http://www.englishforums.com/English/comments12-546192.xml</wfw:commentRss><description>. Fish and cattle are both common plurals for the animals. Fish is also the common uncountable form for the foodstuff. That&amp;#39;s why &amp;#39; is&amp;#39; seems more normal.</description></item><item><title>cattle vs fish</title><link>http://www.englishforums.com/English/CattleVsFish/gjcnb/post.htm</link><pubDate>Mon, 23 Mar 2009 08:13:48 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">946f00bb-57d3-4b7b-a9a2-059b5341af52:546143</guid><dc:creator>New2grammar</dc:creator><slash:comments>2</slash:comments><comments>http://www.englishforums.com/English/CattleVsFish/gjcnb/post.htm</comments><wfw:commentRss>http://www.englishforums.com/English/comments12-546143.xml</wfw:commentRss><description>I&amp;#39;m lost again on countable vs uncountable. There are a lot of fish in the river. Cattle are a source of meat. Fish is/are a source of protein. (I feel &amp;#39;is&amp;#39; is better but it doesn&amp;#39;t follow the cattle pattern ) What do you think? Thanks.</description></item></channel></rss>