<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" ?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="http://www.englishforums.com/utility/FeedStylesheets/rss.xsl" media="screen"?><rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/" xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"><channel><title>ESL General English Grammar Questions</title><link>http://www.englishforums.com/English/GeneralEnglishGrammarQuestions/Forum12.htm</link><description>Ask your questions on grammar and get your sentence checked. We answer lots of different types of general English grammar questions here.</description><dc:language>en</dc:language><generator>CSMOD (Build: 3273.32735)</generator><item><title>Re: wrong sentence</title><link>http://www.englishforums.com/English/WrongSentence/gjddq/post.htm#546277</link><pubDate>Fri, 25 Jul 2008 13:48:04 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">946f00bb-57d3-4b7b-a9a2-059b5341af52:546277</guid><dc:creator>New2grammar</dc:creator><slash:comments>0</slash:comments><comments>http://www.englishforums.com/English/WrongSentence/gjddq/post.htm#546277</comments><wfw:commentRss>http://www.englishforums.com/English/comments12-546277.xml</wfw:commentRss><description>&lt;br /&gt;&lt;BLOCKQUOTE&gt;&lt;div&gt;&lt;img src="/Themes/englishforums/images/icon-quote.gif"&gt; &lt;strong&gt;Grammar Geek&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;div&gt;Well, obviously, the rest of the person showed up too. How gross would it be if just the faces showed up!&lt;/div&gt;&lt;/BLOCKQUOTE&gt; LOL...That&amp;#39;s&amp;nbsp;a good one.&lt;div style="clear:both;"&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</description></item><item><title>Re: wrong sentence</title><link>http://www.englishforums.com/English/WrongSentence/gjddx/post.htm#546275</link><pubDate>Fri, 25 Jul 2008 13:44:31 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">946f00bb-57d3-4b7b-a9a2-059b5341af52:546275</guid><dc:creator>Grammar Geek</dc:creator><slash:comments>1</slash:comments><comments>http://www.englishforums.com/English/WrongSentence/gjddx/post.htm#546275</comments><wfw:commentRss>http://www.englishforums.com/English/comments12-546275.xml</wfw:commentRss><description>&lt;p&gt;I can see they are difficult to learn. Most people who use them (and we do, every day, without realizing it) have no idea that there even&amp;nbsp;are grammatical terms for what they just said.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Common ones are referring to a place/office to represent the person. &amp;quot;The White House said...&amp;quot; &amp;quot;The reaction from Downing Street was swift and severe.&amp;quot;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;But in reading about this just now, I found examples that I never even &lt;em&gt;notice&lt;/em&gt; as being a figure of speech, like &amp;quot;a lot of new faces.&amp;quot; Well, obviously, the rest of the person showed up too. How gross would it be if just the faces showed up! But that&amp;#39;s another example of &amp;quot;one part representing the whole.&amp;quot;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Wholegrain seems to be struggling with this too. You two should join forces.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;div style="clear:both;"&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</description></item><item><title>Re: wrong sentence</title><link>http://www.englishforums.com/English/WrongSentence/gjddg/post.htm#546267</link><pubDate>Fri, 25 Jul 2008 13:31:48 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">946f00bb-57d3-4b7b-a9a2-059b5341af52:546267</guid><dc:creator>New2grammar</dc:creator><slash:comments>2</slash:comments><comments>http://www.englishforums.com/English/WrongSentence/gjddg/post.htm#546267</comments><wfw:commentRss>http://www.englishforums.com/English/comments12-546267.xml</wfw:commentRss><description>Thanks, GG. If the poster had meant to use &amp;#39;by&amp;#39; it would be a metonymy/synechoche right? I&amp;#39;m still tryin gto understand the meanings of the terms.&lt;div style="clear:both;"&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</description></item><item><title>Re: wrong sentence</title><link>http://www.englishforums.com/English/WrongSentence/gjddv/post.htm#546265</link><pubDate>Fri, 25 Jul 2008 13:29:12 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">946f00bb-57d3-4b7b-a9a2-059b5341af52:546265</guid><dc:creator>Grammar Geek</dc:creator><slash:comments>3</slash:comments><comments>http://www.englishforums.com/English/WrongSentence/gjddv/post.htm#546265</comments><wfw:commentRss>http://www.englishforums.com/English/comments12-546265.xml</wfw:commentRss><description>&lt;p&gt;A synechoche is a subset of metonymy, but the original poster was not using is at such - the orignal poster simply made an error with the preposition.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;div style="clear:both;"&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</description></item><item><title>Re: wrong sentence</title><link>http://www.englishforums.com/English/WrongSentence/gjddr/post.htm#546261</link><pubDate>Fri, 25 Jul 2008 13:22:51 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">946f00bb-57d3-4b7b-a9a2-059b5341af52:546261</guid><dc:creator>New2grammar</dc:creator><slash:comments>4</slash:comments><comments>http://www.englishforums.com/English/WrongSentence/gjddr/post.htm#546261</comments><wfw:commentRss>http://www.englishforums.com/English/comments12-546261.xml</wfw:commentRss><description>&lt;BLOCKQUOTE&gt;&lt;div&gt;&lt;img src="/Themes/englishforums/images/icon-quote.gif"&gt; &lt;strong&gt;Delmobile&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;div&gt;,&amp;quot; but I&amp;#39;ve heard this particular &amp;quot;synecdoche&amp;quot; often enough.&lt;/div&gt;&lt;/BLOCKQUOTE&gt; Are you referring to the metonymy in the original question?&lt;div style="clear:both;"&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</description></item><item><title>Re: wrong sentence</title><link>http://www.englishforums.com/English/WrongSentence/gjdbg/post.htm#546233</link><pubDate>Fri, 25 Jul 2008 12:41:28 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">946f00bb-57d3-4b7b-a9a2-059b5341af52:546233</guid><dc:creator>natybrazil</dc:creator><slash:comments>5</slash:comments><comments>http://www.englishforums.com/English/WrongSentence/gjdbg/post.htm#546233</comments><wfw:commentRss>http://www.englishforums.com/English/comments12-546233.xml</wfw:commentRss><description>I should have realized that I needed to use the prepo AT instead of BY.&lt;br /&gt;Thanks.&lt;div style="clear:both;"&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</description></item><item><title>Re: wrong sentence</title><link>http://www.englishforums.com/English/WrongSentence/gjdbz/post.htm#546232</link><pubDate>Fri, 25 Jul 2008 12:37:56 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">946f00bb-57d3-4b7b-a9a2-059b5341af52:546232</guid><dc:creator>Delmobile</dc:creator><slash:comments>6</slash:comments><comments>http://www.englishforums.com/English/WrongSentence/gjdbz/post.htm#546232</comments><wfw:commentRss>http://www.englishforums.com/English/comments12-546232.xml</wfw:commentRss><description>&amp;nbsp;Neither one is enormously wrong, although I would say &amp;quot;Lucy had her hair cut &lt;font color="#ff0000"&gt;at &lt;/font&gt;an expensive beauty parlor downtown.&amp;quot; It is the stylist, not the establishment itself, who actually cuts the hair, so your second sentence might more properly read, &amp;quot;Lucy had someone at an expensive beauty parlor downtown cut her hair,&amp;quot; but I&amp;#39;ve heard this particular &amp;quot;synecdoche&amp;quot; often enough.&lt;div style="clear:both;"&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</description></item><item><title>wrong sentence</title><link>http://www.englishforums.com/English/WrongSentence/gjdrq/post.htm</link><pubDate>Fri, 25 Jul 2008 12:28:31 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">946f00bb-57d3-4b7b-a9a2-059b5341af52:546226</guid><dc:creator>natybrazil</dc:creator><slash:comments>7</slash:comments><comments>http://www.englishforums.com/English/WrongSentence/gjdrq/post.htm</comments><wfw:commentRss>http://www.englishforums.com/English/comments12-546226.xml</wfw:commentRss><description>Hello!&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;What would be the best way to correct the following sentence?&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;strong&gt;&amp;quot;Lucy had her hair cut by an expensive beauty parlor downtown&amp;quot;.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;/strong&gt;Suggestion: Lucy had an expensive beauty parlor downtonwn cut her hair. OK?&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Thanks a lot!&lt;div style="clear:both;"&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</description></item></channel></rss>