http://www.englishforums.com/English/EslGeneralEnglishGrammar-Questions/Forum12.htmAsk your questions on grammar and get your sentence checked. We answer lots of different types of general English grammar questions here. <font color=red>DO NOT post paragraphs and compositions here. Post them in our <a href="http://www.englishforums.com/English/EssayReportCompositionWriting/Forum9.htm"><b>Essay, Report and Composition Writing Forum</b></a>.</font>enXMOD (Build: 3614.32638)http://www.englishforums.com/English/PossessivePlurals/mgjd/post.htm#60850Sat, 23 May 2009 21:12:52 GMT946f00bb-57d3-4b7b-a9a2-059b5341af52:60850asdf0http://www.englishforums.com/English/PossessivePlurals/mgjd/post.htm#60850http://www.englishforums.com/English/comments12-60850.xmlYes, one must know when the word in question is plural. The three basic rules for apostrophe usage cover most situations: (1) singular - add 's (2) plural ending in s - add ' (3) plural not ending in s - add 'shttp://www.englishforums.com/English/PossessivePlurals/mgjd/post.htmFri, 23 Jan 2009 22:12:52 GMT946f00bb-57d3-4b7b-a9a2-059b5341af52:60846mcgdog1http://www.englishforums.com/English/PossessivePlurals/mgjd/post.htmhttp://www.englishforums.com/English/comments12-60846.xmlAm I correct in assuming that in order to know the possessive plural of a word you must know the plural first? If I am correct then what is the plural possessive of foxes? Would it be foxes'? What about ladies, would it be ladies'? Children would be children's? Cities would be cities'. lemmeno thanks