<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" ?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="http://www.englishforums.com/utility/FeedStylesheets/rss.xsl" media="screen"?><rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/" xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"><channel><title>ESL General English Grammar Questions</title><link>http://www.englishforums.com/English/GeneralEnglishGrammarQuestions/Forum12.htm</link><description>Ask your questions on grammar and get your sentence checked. We answer lots of different types of general English grammar questions here.</description><dc:language>en</dc:language><generator>CSMOD (Build: 3273.32735)</generator><item><title>Re:  Compounds with &amp;quot;non&amp;quot;: hyphen or no hyphen?</title><link>http://www.englishforums.com/English/CompoundsHyphenHyphen/zpjgv/post.htm#494007</link><pubDate>Fri, 28 Mar 2008 13:48:28 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">946f00bb-57d3-4b7b-a9a2-059b5341af52:494007</guid><dc:creator>Anonymous</dc:creator><slash:comments>0</slash:comments><comments>http://www.englishforums.com/English/CompoundsHyphenHyphen/zpjgv/post.htm#494007</comments><wfw:commentRss>http://www.englishforums.com/English/comments12-494007.xml</wfw:commentRss><description>I&amp;#39;m afraid that in British English the rule *is* different. We do indeed tend to use hyphens after the prefix &amp;quot;non-&amp;quot; (which avoids the possibility of mispronouncing words such as &amp;quot;nonnative&amp;quot; [&amp;quot;non-native&amp;quot; in BrE]).&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;As regards other prefixes, &amp;quot;pre-&amp;quot; and &amp;quot;co-&amp;quot; still sometimes take a hyphen (particularly where the second part of the word starts with a vowel and could lead to an erroneous pronunciation, e.g. pre-empt, co-opted). According to the Oxford English Dictionary, &amp;quot;micro-organism&amp;quot; is also the preferred form, for similar reasons.&amp;nbsp;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;div style="clear:both;"&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</description></item><item><title>Re: Compounds with "non": hyphen or no hyphen?</title><link>http://www.englishforums.com/English/CompoundsHyphenHyphen/ndww/post.htm#64880</link><pubDate>Mon, 03 Jan 2005 02:35:08 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">946f00bb-57d3-4b7b-a9a2-059b5341af52:64880</guid><dc:creator>Mister Micawber</dc:creator><slash:comments>1</slash:comments><comments>http://www.englishforums.com/English/CompoundsHyphenHyphen/ndww/post.htm#64880</comments><wfw:commentRss>http://www.englishforums.com/English/comments12-64880.xml</wfw:commentRss><description>&lt;br /&gt;In AmE, 'non-' and most other common prefixes are used without the hyphen except in the case of new coinages and words that look confusing without it, like 'non-Hodgkin's lymphoma'.  I would be surprised if the rule were different in BrE.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;</description></item><item><title>Compounds with "non": hyphen or no hyphen?</title><link>http://www.englishforums.com/English/CompoundsHyphenHyphen/ndwc/post.htm</link><pubDate>Mon, 03 Jan 2005 01:46:35 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">946f00bb-57d3-4b7b-a9a2-059b5341af52:64874</guid><dc:creator>Guest</dc:creator><slash:comments>2</slash:comments><comments>http://www.englishforums.com/English/CompoundsHyphenHyphen/ndwc/post.htm</comments><wfw:commentRss>http://www.englishforums.com/English/comments12-64874.xml</wfw:commentRss><description>Greetings--&lt;br /&gt;Is it true that most compounds with "non" are written with a hyphen in British English but are written as one word with no hyphen in American English? Or are things more complicated than this?&lt;br /&gt;Cheers&lt;br /&gt;Robert</description></item></channel></rss>