ESL General English Grammar Questions

preposition

Mister Micawber — Sat, 08 Jan 2005 14:52:55 GMT

I think we need to agree on a definition of 'idiomatic'. To me, it means 'comforming to natural language formation'-- the way native speakers form the utterance, as opposed to unnatural structures sometimes assembled by ESL/EFL students. For example:

'It's good to see you again' is idiomatic English.
'It's good that I see you again' is not.

I'm not sure who I'm speaking to, though.

Re: Oooooops J~~~~~~ust one more question.....^^

nona the brit — Sat, 08 Jan 2005 14:46:04 GMT

Hi.

Firstly I think you are misunderstanding the word 'idiom'. This is a 'set-phrase' and there are not idioms for everything. Things do not sound 'idiomatic'. They are either idioms or not.

You are perhaps looking for what sounds most natural, most informal, most like native speech, most colloquial etc.

Both of your sentences sound ok and might be used in different circumstances.

Man dangling off cliff edge desperately clinging to bush thinks to himself 'How long can I hold on to (note two words) this?

Woman thrilled at being passed a cheque for £100,000,000 just for a publicity photograph (not hers to keep) jokingly asks 'How long can I hold on to this for?'

I think that in general you would use the first version though, the second sounds a little clumsy.

Re: Oooooops J~~~~~~ust one more question.....^^

Mister Micawber — Sat, 08 Jan 2005 14:44:23 GMT

Both sound equally likely to me, spoken. Written formally, of course: 'For how long can I hold onto this?'

PS: Please give your threads more descriptive subject titles, JK-- it makes it difficult for mods and others to select.

how long/ for how long

JKBelieve — Sat, 08 Jan 2005 14:12:50 GMT

Hope I'm not annoying you guys.....well here goes.....

'How long can I hold onto this?'

and

'How long can I hold onto this for?'

Which one sounds more idiomatic?