<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" ?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="http://www.englishforums.com/utility/FeedStylesheets/rss.xsl" media="screen"?><rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/" xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"><channel><title>ESL General English Grammar Questions</title><link>http://www.englishforums.com/English/GeneralEnglishGrammarQuestions/Forum12.htm</link><description>Ask your questions on grammar and get your sentence checked. We answer lots of different types of general English grammar questions here.</description><dc:language>en</dc:language><generator>CSMOD (Build: 3273.32735)</generator><item><title>Re: Sentence analysis (6 mai)</title><link>http://www.englishforums.com/English/SentenceAnalysis6Mai/bcnhl/post.htm#97234</link><pubDate>Sun, 08 May 2005 02:42:36 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">946f00bb-57d3-4b7b-a9a2-059b5341af52:97234</guid><dc:creator>Mister Micawber</dc:creator><slash:comments>0</slash:comments><comments>http://www.englishforums.com/English/SentenceAnalysis6Mai/bcnhl/post.htm#97234</comments><wfw:commentRss>http://www.englishforums.com/English/comments12-97234.xml</wfw:commentRss><description>&lt;br /&gt;Ah yes, I see.  The basic 'function' of a verb is to 'express an action, thought or state of being'-- or something to that effect.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;But I don't think that the word 'function' is used linguistically-- or in linguistics-- to separate 'part of speech' from subdivisions of same ('syntactic nature').  One could do so in e.g. an academic paper if one defined them as such, I suppose.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;However, I don't converse a lot with linguists, so I don't really know how they use this nomenclature popularly.  'Function' is a relatively superordinate word/concept, though.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;</description></item><item><title>Re: Sentence analysis (6 mai)</title><link>http://www.englishforums.com/English/SentenceAnalysis6Mai/bcndm/post.htm#97167</link><pubDate>Sat, 07 May 2005 18:54:12 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">946f00bb-57d3-4b7b-a9a2-059b5341af52:97167</guid><dc:creator>Hela</dc:creator><slash:comments>1</slash:comments><comments>http://www.englishforums.com/English/SentenceAnalysis6Mai/bcndm/post.htm#97167</comments><wfw:commentRss>http://www.englishforums.com/English/comments12-97167.xml</wfw:commentRss><description>Thanks Mr Micawber,&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;3) I think that the function of a verb (part of speech) is to be a "verb". But when we say that it is copular, transitive and so on, we probably talk about its "syntactic nature" or "verb type", right ?&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Kind regards,&lt;br /&gt;Hela</description></item><item><title>Re: Sentence analysis (6 mai)</title><link>http://www.englishforums.com/English/SentenceAnalysis6Mai/bcmpp/post.htm#97085</link><pubDate>Sat, 07 May 2005 14:16:01 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">946f00bb-57d3-4b7b-a9a2-059b5341af52:97085</guid><dc:creator>Mister Micawber</dc:creator><slash:comments>2</slash:comments><comments>http://www.englishforums.com/English/SentenceAnalysis6Mai/bcmpp/post.htm#97085</comments><wfw:commentRss>http://www.englishforums.com/English/comments12-97085.xml</wfw:commentRss><description>&lt;br /&gt;(1)  'Intensive verb' is not a common denomination in English; 'intensive' is normally used of adjectives and adverbs like 'utter' ('utter nonsense') and 'extremely' ('extremely dense').  I recommend that you stick with 'copular' or 'linking' verb for clear communication.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;(2)  Hopefully grammatical class and function will be the same, but in cases where it is not, the verb would be classified according to its function, as with or example:&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;I hurt my Achilles tendon. (transitive 'hurt')&lt;br /&gt;My sacroiliac hurts. (intransitive 'hurt')&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;(3)  What do you call what in linguistics?-- I'm sure of neither your question, nor the answer.  Sorry&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;(4)  'Of her looks', it seems to me, is not an adverbial, but a prepositional complement of the adjective 'proud'.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;</description></item><item><title>Re: Sentence analysis (6 mai)</title><link>http://www.englishforums.com/English/SentenceAnalysis6Mai/bcmjj/post.htm#96977</link><pubDate>Sat, 07 May 2005 09:00:05 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">946f00bb-57d3-4b7b-a9a2-059b5341af52:96977</guid><dc:creator>Hela</dc:creator><slash:comments>3</slash:comments><comments>http://www.englishforums.com/English/SentenceAnalysis6Mai/bcmjj/post.htm#96977</comments><wfw:commentRss>http://www.englishforums.com/English/comments12-96977.xml</wfw:commentRss><description>Thanks Mr Micawber,&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;And what do you think of "She is very proud of her looks"&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;She = subject&lt;br /&gt;is = intensive verb&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;(by the way how would you qualify "intensive / transitive / intransitive" is is the NATURE of the verb, its GRAMMATICAL CLASS rather than its functions? What do you call this exactly in linguistics ?)&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;very proud = subject complement&lt;br /&gt;of her looks = ? / adverbial ? if yes, of what ?&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Many thanks,&lt;br /&gt;Hela&lt;br /&gt;</description></item><item><title>Re: Sentence analysis (6 mai)</title><link>http://www.englishforums.com/English/SentenceAnalysis6Mai/bcmjr/post.htm#96968</link><pubDate>Sat, 07 May 2005 07:18:27 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">946f00bb-57d3-4b7b-a9a2-059b5341af52:96968</guid><dc:creator>Mister Micawber</dc:creator><slash:comments>4</slash:comments><comments>http://www.englishforums.com/English/SentenceAnalysis6Mai/bcmjr/post.htm#96968</comments><wfw:commentRss>http://www.englishforums.com/English/comments12-96968.xml</wfw:commentRss><description>&lt;br /&gt;Looks good to me, Hela.  You could go on to call it a 'nominal object complement', I suppose.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;</description></item><item><title>Sentence analysis (6 mai)</title><link>http://www.englishforums.com/English/SentenceAnalysis6Mai/bcmcd/post.htm</link><pubDate>Fri, 06 May 2005 19:55:50 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">946f00bb-57d3-4b7b-a9a2-059b5341af52:96852</guid><dc:creator>Hela</dc:creator><slash:comments>5</slash:comments><comments>http://www.englishforums.com/English/SentenceAnalysis6Mai/bcmcd/post.htm</comments><wfw:commentRss>http://www.englishforums.com/English/comments12-96852.xml</wfw:commentRss><description>Dear teachers,&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Would you please tell me if my analysis is correct ?&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;They considered the sunny sandy beaches a property of theirs.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;They = subject&lt;br /&gt;Considered = transitive verb &lt;br /&gt;The sunny sandy beaches = direct object&lt;br /&gt;A property of theirs = object complement&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;All the best,&lt;br /&gt;Hela&lt;br /&gt;</description></item></channel></rss>