<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" ?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="http://www.englishforums.com/utility/FeedStylesheets/rss.xsl" media="screen"?><rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/" xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"><channel><title>Controversial Topics</title><link>http://www.englishforums.com/English/ControversialTopics/Forum28.htm</link><description>&lt;font color=red&gt;This entire section is moderated&lt;/font&gt;&lt;br&gt;
Dedicated to continual re-education and our search for a broader understanding of life. Please register if you wish to post here.</description><dc:language>en</dc:language><generator>XMOD (Build: 3614.32638)</generator><item><title>Re: Global Warming: Who is guilty?</title><link>http://www.englishforums.com/English/GlobalWarmingWhoIsGuilty/4/dmqmp/Post.htm#358923</link><pubDate>Tue, 24 Feb 2009 01:46:52 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">946f00bb-57d3-4b7b-a9a2-059b5341af52:358923</guid><dc:creator>Alexa For Australia</dc:creator><slash:comments>0</slash:comments><comments>http://www.englishforums.com/English/GlobalWarmingWhoIsGuilty/4/dmqmp/Post.htm#358923</comments><wfw:commentRss>http://www.englishforums.com/English/comments28-358923.xml</wfw:commentRss><description>Everybody. 
 Me too. 
 I smoke. 
 Alexa</description></item><item><title>Re: Global Warming: Who is guilty?</title><link>http://www.englishforums.com/English/GlobalWarmingWhoIsGuilty/4/dmqmp/Post.htm#355850</link><pubDate>Tue, 24 Feb 2009 01:46:53 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">946f00bb-57d3-4b7b-a9a2-059b5341af52:355850</guid><dc:creator>Stannum</dc:creator><slash:comments>1</slash:comments><comments>http://www.englishforums.com/English/GlobalWarmingWhoIsGuilty/4/dmqmp/Post.htm#355850</comments><wfw:commentRss>http://www.englishforums.com/English/comments28-355850.xml</wfw:commentRss><description>G'day Pidr1nhu 
 You and me! 
 That's who is responsible. 
 When we stop voting for our big cars and airconditioned homes we will start to have a chance. 
 We can not just keep blaming 'them'. 

 Stannum</description></item><item><title>All consummers, governements, industry are responsible for global warming</title><link>http://www.englishforums.com/English/GlobalWarmingWhoIsGuilty/4/dmqmp/Post.htm#351746</link><pubDate>Tue, 24 Feb 2009 01:46:53 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">946f00bb-57d3-4b7b-a9a2-059b5341af52:351746</guid><dc:creator>monfrancom</dc:creator><slash:comments>2</slash:comments><comments>http://www.englishforums.com/English/GlobalWarmingWhoIsGuilty/4/dmqmp/Post.htm#351746</comments><wfw:commentRss>http://www.englishforums.com/English/comments28-351746.xml</wfw:commentRss><description>Greetings I really believe that the reality of global warming and its impact on our respective living environments is now more than crucial. It has gone much farther than "damage control" and certainly beyond repair. As foretold by my biology teacher (he was actually quoting the results of two scientifists -different sources- back in 1975 or 6 (news worthy events) when I was in my 11th or 12th grade   They said that if nothing was immediately done to change our lifestyle habits, by the year 2000 the damage done to the earth would be unreparable. I was shocked and absorbed all that he said at that moment. This teacher was well respected. In the three years he taught me, it was the only time that he digressed from his subject matter. He...</description></item><item><title>Re: Global Warming: Who is guilty?</title><link>http://www.englishforums.com/English/GlobalWarmingWhoIsGuilty/4/dmqmp/Post.htm#335264</link><pubDate>Sun, 24 May 2009 00:46:53 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">946f00bb-57d3-4b7b-a9a2-059b5341af52:335264</guid><dc:creator>Golden</dc:creator><slash:comments>3</slash:comments><comments>http://www.englishforums.com/English/GlobalWarmingWhoIsGuilty/4/dmqmp/Post.htm#335264</comments><wfw:commentRss>http://www.englishforums.com/English/comments28-335264.xml</wfw:commentRss><description>anyone who drives and doesn't recyle their garbage</description></item><item><title>Re: Global Warming: Who is guilty?</title><link>http://www.englishforums.com/English/GlobalWarmingWhoIsGuilty/4/dmqmp/Post.htm#335004</link><pubDate>Sat, 24 Jan 2009 01:46:53 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">946f00bb-57d3-4b7b-a9a2-059b5341af52:335004</guid><dc:creator>Titithi</dc:creator><slash:comments>4</slash:comments><comments>http://www.englishforums.com/English/GlobalWarmingWhoIsGuilty/4/dmqmp/Post.htm#335004</comments><wfw:commentRss>http://www.englishforums.com/English/comments28-335004.xml</wfw:commentRss><description>Your gentle and emotional reply makes me let more time to think over what you've said. As a matter of fact, I don't accuse anyone of guiltiness. However, at the bottom of my heart a growing sense of anxiety has left me exhausted. Every thing has its cause and consequence. There is not an effect without cause.All of media of communication around me determine that the level sea becomes higher, so your persuative reasons couldn't interrupt my anxiety about the climate change, an important factor of our globe today.As you know,we have just built a wall of stone to keep the sea away from our land, so the flood didn't overflow our village after the attack of the typhoon which caused a lot of damage in our district.It reminds me of the image of...</description></item><item><title>Global cooling</title><link>http://www.englishforums.com/English/GlobalWarmingWhoIsGuilty/4/dmqmp/Post.htm#334186</link><pubDate>Tue, 24 Mar 2009 01:46:53 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">946f00bb-57d3-4b7b-a9a2-059b5341af52:334186</guid><dc:creator>Anonymous</dc:creator><slash:comments>5</slash:comments><comments>http://www.englishforums.com/English/GlobalWarmingWhoIsGuilty/4/dmqmp/Post.htm#334186</comments><wfw:commentRss>http://www.englishforums.com/English/comments28-334186.xml</wfw:commentRss><description>Thanks,  
Arvsworld, for a touch of realistic input.</description></item><item><title>Re: Global Warming: Who is guilty?</title><link>http://www.englishforums.com/English/GlobalWarmingWhoIsGuilty/4/dmqmp/Post.htm#333683</link><pubDate>Sun, 24 May 2009 00:46:53 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">946f00bb-57d3-4b7b-a9a2-059b5341af52:333683</guid><dc:creator>Arvsworld</dc:creator><slash:comments>6</slash:comments><comments>http://www.englishforums.com/English/GlobalWarmingWhoIsGuilty/4/dmqmp/Post.htm#333683</comments><wfw:commentRss>http://www.englishforums.com/English/comments28-333683.xml</wfw:commentRss><description>What if we stop pointing the finger at people, governments or nations and just accept the fact that we cannot control nature? 
 Science and technology has advanced exponentially during the past century. Even with those advances under our belts, there's nothing we can do once nature turns. Earth is 4.5 billion years old. Dinosaurs dominated this planet for much longer than we have, so far. 
 Truth is, we're nothing but a mosquito on Earth's skin. And it'll swat us if it feels us sting . And that's all there is to it. It's a cycle. There have been many instances of global warming before. There have also been many instances of ice ages and polar shifts. There have also been many instances of bombardment by asteroids and meteors. There...</description></item><item><title>Re: Global Cooling</title><link>http://www.englishforums.com/English/GlobalWarmingWhoIsGuilty/3/dmqmp/Post.htm#333587</link><pubDate>Tue, 24 Mar 2009 01:46:53 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">946f00bb-57d3-4b7b-a9a2-059b5341af52:333587</guid><dc:creator>Anonymous</dc:creator><slash:comments>7</slash:comments><comments>http://www.englishforums.com/English/GlobalWarmingWhoIsGuilty/3/dmqmp/Post.htm#333587</comments><wfw:commentRss>http://www.englishforums.com/English/comments28-333587.xml</wfw:commentRss><description>According to your information about global warming, I try to find some evidence of what you 've said. It seems that it's quite opposite of the knowledge that I've learned: The globe's increasing temperature is a result of human activity.So ,I feel difficult to believe this recent investigation because it appears to be in conflict with some other scientists. Time will answer us. No one could determine exactly what is the most persuasive theory still it has been accepted by everybody.The most important thing is that we should save our globe. It seems illogical but together our small efforts can change the world.No matter what kind of effect which threatens our global, we should try to protect our environment,to fight against the...</description></item><item><title>Global Cooling</title><link>http://www.englishforums.com/English/GlobalWarmingWhoIsGuilty/3/dmqmp/Post.htm#332144</link><pubDate>Fri, 24 Apr 2009 00:46:53 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">946f00bb-57d3-4b7b-a9a2-059b5341af52:332144</guid><dc:creator>Anonymous</dc:creator><slash:comments>8</slash:comments><comments>http://www.englishforums.com/English/GlobalWarmingWhoIsGuilty/3/dmqmp/Post.htm#332144</comments><wfw:commentRss>http://www.englishforums.com/English/comments28-332144.xml</wfw:commentRss><description>"...100 million years ago, there was six times as much carbon dioxide in
the atmosphere as there is now, yet the temperature then was marginally
cooler than it is today. Many scientists have concluded that carbon
dioxide doesn't even affect climate." http://www.ourcivilisation.com/aginatur/prog1.htm#suspend Full page is here http://www.ourcivilisation.com/aginatur/moregw.htm  Global Warming scaremongering is politics. If you control energy use, you control people.  It is NOT SCIENCE.</description></item><item><title>Re: Global Warming: Who is guilty?</title><link>http://www.englishforums.com/English/GlobalWarmingWhoIsGuilty/3/dmqmp/Post.htm#332113</link><pubDate>Tue, 24 Feb 2009 01:46:53 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">946f00bb-57d3-4b7b-a9a2-059b5341af52:332113</guid><dc:creator>Anonymous</dc:creator><slash:comments>9</slash:comments><comments>http://www.englishforums.com/English/GlobalWarmingWhoIsGuilty/3/dmqmp/Post.htm#332113</comments><wfw:commentRss>http://www.englishforums.com/English/comments28-332113.xml</wfw:commentRss><description>There is no global warming!  For many years now, human-caused climate change has been
viewed as a large and urgent problem. In truth, however, the biggest
part of the problem is neither environmental nor scientific, but a
self-created political fiasco. Consider the simple fact, drawn from the
official temperature records of the Climate Research Unit at the
University of East Anglia, that for the years 1998 -2005 global 
average temperature did not increase (there was actually a slight
decrease, though not at a rate that differs significantly from zero). 
 Telegraph: Bob Carter</description></item><item><title>Re: Global Warming: Who is guilty?</title><link>http://www.englishforums.com/English/GlobalWarmingWhoIsGuilty/3/dmqmp/Post.htm#332093</link><pubDate>Tue, 24 Mar 2009 01:46:53 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">946f00bb-57d3-4b7b-a9a2-059b5341af52:332093</guid><dc:creator>Titithi</dc:creator><slash:comments>10</slash:comments><comments>http://www.englishforums.com/English/GlobalWarmingWhoIsGuilty/3/dmqmp/Post.htm#332093</comments><wfw:commentRss>http://www.englishforums.com/English/comments28-332093.xml</wfw:commentRss><description>It seems your quoted article confirms that not only does the sun cause global warming but also our unintentional irresponsibility destroys the balance of the environment.Everyone should lesser the climate change by making every effort to decrease as quickly as possible the serious air pollution caused by the emission of carbon dioxide and other gazes .Reduction of burning fuel by controlling industrial emissions, smoke from chimneys,encouraging the use of unleaded petrol, should be a major importance . In our country, we usually pay greater attention to our "green" policies: protecting the natural environment and the fight against the polution. Our government have attempted to control poisonous waste on the land, toxic substances from...</description></item><item><title>Re: Global Warming: Who is guilty?</title><link>http://www.englishforums.com/English/GlobalWarmingWhoIsGuilty/3/dmqmp/Post.htm#329284</link><pubDate>Tue, 24 Mar 2009 01:46:53 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">946f00bb-57d3-4b7b-a9a2-059b5341af52:329284</guid><dc:creator>Anonymous</dc:creator><slash:comments>11</slash:comments><comments>http://www.englishforums.com/English/GlobalWarmingWhoIsGuilty/3/dmqmp/Post.htm#329284</comments><wfw:commentRss>http://www.englishforums.com/English/comments28-329284.xml</wfw:commentRss><description>We are NOT to blame for global warming.  WAKE UP! Look at the evidence! There is plenty of it it you choose not to believe the United Nations propaganda and instead do a little investigating!  The truth about global warming - it's the Sun that's to blame 
 
By Michael Leidig and Roya Nikkhah 
 Last Updated: 11:15pm BST 17/07/2004 
 
 
 Global
warming has finally been explained: the Earth is getting hotter because
the Sun is burning more brightly than at any time during the past 1,000
years, according to new research. 
 A study by Swiss
and German scientists suggests that increasing radiation from the sun
is responsible for recent global climate changes. 
 Dr
Sami Solanki, the director of the renowned Max Planck Institute...</description></item><item><title>Re: Global Warming: Who is guilty?</title><link>http://www.englishforums.com/English/GlobalWarmingWhoIsGuilty/3/dmqmp/Post.htm#329139</link><pubDate>Fri, 24 Apr 2009 00:46:53 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">946f00bb-57d3-4b7b-a9a2-059b5341af52:329139</guid><dc:creator>Anonymous</dc:creator><slash:comments>12</slash:comments><comments>http://www.englishforums.com/English/GlobalWarmingWhoIsGuilty/3/dmqmp/Post.htm#329139</comments><wfw:commentRss>http://www.englishforums.com/English/comments28-329139.xml</wfw:commentRss><description>It seems that it is a very common and difficult problem to deal with. When countries develop into better, richer conditions, they usually pollute the environment at the expense of the nature. It is also a very difficult dilemma to strike a balance so that both economic development can be achieved while the ecology will not be undermined. I hope all the countries can take this into serious consideration.</description></item><item><title>Re: Global Warming: Who is guilty?</title><link>http://www.englishforums.com/English/GlobalWarmingWhoIsGuilty/3/dmqmp/Post.htm#329048</link><pubDate>Sun, 24 May 2009 00:46:53 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">946f00bb-57d3-4b7b-a9a2-059b5341af52:329048</guid><dc:creator>Anonymous</dc:creator><slash:comments>13</slash:comments><comments>http://www.englishforums.com/English/GlobalWarmingWhoIsGuilty/3/dmqmp/Post.htm#329048</comments><wfw:commentRss>http://www.englishforums.com/English/comments28-329048.xml</wfw:commentRss><description>I think all of us are guilty. Some are a little lesser than the others . The developing countries destroy their forests, the developed countries emit smoke by burning fuel to operate their industry, factories, machines, cars,etc...So there is a change of our climate. I support the Green peace.I always plant green trees and keep our forest for a lung of our city.However , earthquakes occured in our country, it made me terrified with some little strucks. Typhoons have just visited us and the day after ,we should evacuate to prevent tidal waves and fortunately it didn't occur. And when Taiwan had an earthquake, we should a second time to evacuate, and a lucky second time it didn't occur.If there were tidal waves this night, we couldn't...</description></item><item><title>Re: Global Warming: Who is guilty?</title><link>http://www.englishforums.com/English/GlobalWarmingWhoIsGuilty/3/dmqmp/Post.htm#324005</link><pubDate>Tue, 24 Mar 2009 01:46:53 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">946f00bb-57d3-4b7b-a9a2-059b5341af52:324005</guid><dc:creator>Billie the big aircraft carrier</dc:creator><slash:comments>14</slash:comments><comments>http://www.englishforums.com/English/GlobalWarmingWhoIsGuilty/3/dmqmp/Post.htm#324005</comments><wfw:commentRss>http://www.englishforums.com/English/comments28-324005.xml</wfw:commentRss><description>Dominate? Don't you mean Flatulate? Whhoooaaahhhh... I'm getting out of here!  This thread stinks!</description></item><item><title>Re: Global Warming: Who is guilty?</title><link>http://www.englishforums.com/English/GlobalWarmingWhoIsGuilty/3/dmqmp/Post.htm#315348</link><pubDate>Tue, 24 Feb 2009 01:46:53 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">946f00bb-57d3-4b7b-a9a2-059b5341af52:315348</guid><dc:creator>Pidr1nhu</dc:creator><slash:comments>15</slash:comments><comments>http://www.englishforums.com/English/GlobalWarmingWhoIsGuilty/3/dmqmp/Post.htm#315348</comments><wfw:commentRss>http://www.englishforums.com/English/comments28-315348.xml</wfw:commentRss><description>Ok...I am totally convinced I have extended the main subject to where I do not 'dominate'.... I ask excuses...Young Californian. Regards my friend.</description></item><item><title>Re: Global Warming: Who is guilty?</title><link>http://www.englishforums.com/English/GlobalWarmingWhoIsGuilty/2/dmqmp/Post.htm#315276</link><pubDate>Tue, 24 Mar 2009 01:46:53 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">946f00bb-57d3-4b7b-a9a2-059b5341af52:315276</guid><dc:creator>YoungCalifornian</dc:creator><slash:comments>16</slash:comments><comments>http://www.englishforums.com/English/GlobalWarmingWhoIsGuilty/2/dmqmp/Post.htm#315276</comments><wfw:commentRss>http://www.englishforums.com/English/comments28-315276.xml</wfw:commentRss><description>Young Californian, then I am better informed than you; I don't mean to be rude, ok, just expressing what you can confront too.    
 Well then allow me to confront you. I also hope I do not sound rude, but the fact is that you completely wrong, Pidr1nhu. I do not deny that deforestation has and will continue to be a significant problem in the United States (I really don't know much regarding forestry in Europe, so I will focus on the United States). However, when I read some of the assertions you've stated as fact, I feel compelled to respond. These two statements in particular are utterly ridiculous: 
    USA and Europe has destroyed almost completely their forests territories...    
    You should know better than me that US has...</description></item><item><title>Re: Global Warming: Who is guilty?</title><link>http://www.englishforums.com/English/GlobalWarmingWhoIsGuilty/2/dmqmp/Post.htm#315156</link><pubDate>Fri, 24 Apr 2009 00:46:53 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">946f00bb-57d3-4b7b-a9a2-059b5341af52:315156</guid><dc:creator>Pidr1nhu</dc:creator><slash:comments>17</slash:comments><comments>http://www.englishforums.com/English/GlobalWarmingWhoIsGuilty/2/dmqmp/Post.htm#315156</comments><wfw:commentRss>http://www.englishforums.com/English/comments28-315156.xml</wfw:commentRss><description>Young Californian, then I am better informed than you; I don't mean to be rude, ok, just expressing what you can confront too. You should know better than me that US has deforested almost of its natural resources, just preserving on specific areas; correct me if I am wrong, was there a burning on the surroundings of MALIBU? you have got forest there...but why exactly there? uhn...a great number of Hollywood starts live there, so I think valuing nearby forest would maintain the price of this area high and suitable for more millionaires or billionaires investments. Young Californian, I am not against capitalism nor those crazy environmentalists, I am a defendant of stop global warming but at a reasonable level, not taking stupid steps. I...</description></item><item><title>Re: Global Warming: Who is guilty?</title><link>http://www.englishforums.com/English/GlobalWarmingWhoIsGuilty/2/dmqmp/Post.htm#315085</link><pubDate>Tue, 24 Feb 2009 01:46:53 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">946f00bb-57d3-4b7b-a9a2-059b5341af52:315085</guid><dc:creator>Billie the big aircraft carrier</dc:creator><slash:comments>18</slash:comments><comments>http://www.englishforums.com/English/GlobalWarmingWhoIsGuilty/2/dmqmp/Post.htm#315085</comments><wfw:commentRss>http://www.englishforums.com/English/comments28-315085.xml</wfw:commentRss><description>"pushing silently to keep Amazon in an international protected zone"... now your talking! The Global Warming thing has little to do with protecting anything but the profits of the One World Government crew. Keel haul the bastards I say! Harrrrrrrrrrrrrrr</description></item><item><title>Re: Global Warming: Who is guilty?</title><link>http://www.englishforums.com/English/GlobalWarmingWhoIsGuilty/2/dmqmp/Post.htm#315017</link><pubDate>Tue, 24 Feb 2009 01:46:53 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">946f00bb-57d3-4b7b-a9a2-059b5341af52:315017</guid><dc:creator>Pidr1nhu</dc:creator><slash:comments>19</slash:comments><comments>http://www.englishforums.com/English/GlobalWarmingWhoIsGuilty/2/dmqmp/Post.htm#315017</comments><wfw:commentRss>http://www.englishforums.com/English/comments28-315017.xml</wfw:commentRss><description>You are right, Brazil has a poor record of preservation and of treatment of native populations, I agree with you, but....What does UK have to preserve? I think your government 'burned down' everything it could to feed progress starting with Industrial Revolution, which from my point of view was great but too much depredating to natural resources, what is left? probably those areas of difficult access, I suppose.Furthermore, foreigners, mainly UK and USA, are taking our resources from amazing Amazon forest to register as your patents and developing drugs that once more reinforce poor records of preservation of my country.Not a surprise that international community is pushing silently to keep Amazon in an international protected zone,...</description></item><item><title>Re: Global Warming: Who is guilty?</title><link>http://www.englishforums.com/English/GlobalWarmingWhoIsGuilty/2/dmqmp/Post.htm#315011</link><pubDate>Tue, 24 Mar 2009 01:46:53 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">946f00bb-57d3-4b7b-a9a2-059b5341af52:315011</guid><dc:creator>YoungCalifornian</dc:creator><slash:comments>20</slash:comments><comments>http://www.englishforums.com/English/GlobalWarmingWhoIsGuilty/2/dmqmp/Post.htm#315011</comments><wfw:commentRss>http://www.englishforums.com/English/comments28-315011.xml</wfw:commentRss><description>USA and Europe has destroyed almost completely their forests territories    
 That's news to me...</description></item><item><title>Re: Global Warming: Who is guilty?</title><link>http://www.englishforums.com/English/GlobalWarmingWhoIsGuilty/2/dmqmp/Post.htm#314975</link><pubDate>Fri, 24 Apr 2009 00:46:53 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">946f00bb-57d3-4b7b-a9a2-059b5341af52:314975</guid><dc:creator>Feebs11</dc:creator><slash:comments>21</slash:comments><comments>http://www.englishforums.com/English/GlobalWarmingWhoIsGuilty/2/dmqmp/Post.htm#314975</comments><wfw:commentRss>http://www.englishforums.com/English/comments28-314975.xml</wfw:commentRss><description>Brazil has a poor record of preservation of natural resources. It has a poor record in its treatment of native populations. Take a closer look nearer to home before accusing others. And terminal illness has an interesting effect on the way in which life, the Universe and Everything is seen. There is no longer the fear of death, which underlies all the fears about Global Warming. I am more concerned with those who now are unable to find their next meal or who cannot access good medical care than about something that may not happen for several hundred years, and may never happen.</description></item><item><title>Re: Global Warming: Who is guilty?</title><link>http://www.englishforums.com/English/GlobalWarmingWhoIsGuilty/2/dmqmp/Post.htm#314821</link><pubDate>Tue, 24 Feb 2009 01:46:53 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">946f00bb-57d3-4b7b-a9a2-059b5341af52:314821</guid><dc:creator>Pidr1nhu</dc:creator><slash:comments>22</slash:comments><comments>http://www.englishforums.com/English/GlobalWarmingWhoIsGuilty/2/dmqmp/Post.htm#314821</comments><wfw:commentRss>http://www.englishforums.com/English/comments28-314821.xml</wfw:commentRss><description>Not terrified Clive Woodward. One point is sure: Environment has been damaged and a full restoration is needed, USA and Europe has destroyed almost completely their forests territories while China, India, Brazil and others emerging countries are to be prevented from doing the same. What do you mean with "go do some homework of your own"? The question is what would you do, I can see a state of comfortableness not willing to do something of your own. Regards.</description></item><item><title>Re: Global Warming: Who is guilty?</title><link>http://www.englishforums.com/English/GlobalWarmingWhoIsGuilty/2/dmqmp/Post.htm#314813</link><pubDate>Fri, 24 Apr 2009 00:46:53 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">946f00bb-57d3-4b7b-a9a2-059b5341af52:314813</guid><dc:creator>Pidr1nhu</dc:creator><slash:comments>23</slash:comments><comments>http://www.englishforums.com/English/GlobalWarmingWhoIsGuilty/2/dmqmp/Post.htm#314813</comments><wfw:commentRss>http://www.englishforums.com/English/comments28-314813.xml</wfw:commentRss><description>Feebs11, it's hard to say but your option is a selfish one, who knows what is at the other side. That would be the same to say: Why take care of world's health if I am not gonna be alive to see it destroyed.</description></item><item><title>Re: Global Warming: Who is guilty?</title><link>http://www.englishforums.com/English/GlobalWarmingWhoIsGuilty/2/dmqmp/Post.htm#314781</link><pubDate>Tue, 24 Feb 2009 01:46:53 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">946f00bb-57d3-4b7b-a9a2-059b5341af52:314781</guid><dc:creator>Feebs11</dc:creator><slash:comments>24</slash:comments><comments>http://www.englishforums.com/English/GlobalWarmingWhoIsGuilty/2/dmqmp/Post.htm#314781</comments><wfw:commentRss>http://www.englishforums.com/English/comments28-314781.xml</wfw:commentRss><description>Frankly, I couldn't care less. I have terminal cancer, so whatever happens will not affect me. But others may care, and might care to look carefully at a wider picture, and give that picture deep and well planned consideration.</description></item><item><title>Re: Global Warming: Who is guilty?</title><link>http://www.englishforums.com/English/GlobalWarmingWhoIsGuilty/dmqmp/post.htm#314717</link><pubDate>Sun, 24 May 2009 00:46:53 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">946f00bb-57d3-4b7b-a9a2-059b5341af52:314717</guid><dc:creator>Clive Woodward</dc:creator><slash:comments>25</slash:comments><comments>http://www.englishforums.com/English/GlobalWarmingWhoIsGuilty/dmqmp/post.htm#314717</comments><wfw:commentRss>http://www.englishforums.com/English/comments28-314717.xml</wfw:commentRss><description>See, you are terrified! Don't just examine the particular article I linked. Go do some homework of your own. It's hard to give up the beliefs we have held for a long time... but a quest for the truth demands it!</description></item><item><title>Re: Global Warming: Who is guilty?</title><link>http://www.englishforums.com/English/GlobalWarmingWhoIsGuilty/dmqmp/post.htm#314670</link><pubDate>Tue, 24 Mar 2009 01:46:53 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">946f00bb-57d3-4b7b-a9a2-059b5341af52:314670</guid><dc:creator>Feebs11</dc:creator><slash:comments>26</slash:comments><comments>http://www.englishforums.com/English/GlobalWarmingWhoIsGuilty/dmqmp/post.htm#314670</comments><wfw:commentRss>http://www.englishforums.com/English/comments28-314670.xml</wfw:commentRss><description>No proposal was made - a statement was made. Up to everyone to find an answer</description></item><item><title>Re: Global Warming: Who is guilty?</title><link>http://www.englishforums.com/English/GlobalWarmingWhoIsGuilty/dmqmp/post.htm#314626</link><pubDate>Tue, 24 Feb 2009 01:46:53 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">946f00bb-57d3-4b7b-a9a2-059b5341af52:314626</guid><dc:creator>Pidr1nhu</dc:creator><slash:comments>27</slash:comments><comments>http://www.englishforums.com/English/GlobalWarmingWhoIsGuilty/dmqmp/post.htm#314626</comments><wfw:commentRss>http://www.englishforums.com/English/comments28-314626.xml</wfw:commentRss><description>and what do you propose: kill hundreds or let drought, floods or other natural disasters decimate the majority of world's population? Frankly, there was stupid.</description></item><item><title>Re: Global Warming: Who is guilty?</title><link>http://www.englishforums.com/English/GlobalWarmingWhoIsGuilty/dmqmp/post.htm#314561</link><pubDate>Tue, 24 Feb 2009 01:46:53 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">946f00bb-57d3-4b7b-a9a2-059b5341af52:314561</guid><dc:creator>Feebs11</dc:creator><slash:comments>28</slash:comments><comments>http://www.englishforums.com/English/GlobalWarmingWhoIsGuilty/dmqmp/post.htm#314561</comments><wfw:commentRss>http://www.englishforums.com/English/comments28-314561.xml</wfw:commentRss><description>Basically the problem is too many people.</description></item><item><title>Re: Global Warming: Who is guilty?</title><link>http://www.englishforums.com/English/GlobalWarmingWhoIsGuilty/dmqmp/post.htm#314537</link><pubDate>Sun, 24 May 2009 00:46:53 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">946f00bb-57d3-4b7b-a9a2-059b5341af52:314537</guid><dc:creator>Pidr1nhu</dc:creator><slash:comments>29</slash:comments><comments>http://www.englishforums.com/English/GlobalWarmingWhoIsGuilty/dmqmp/post.htm#314537</comments><wfw:commentRss>http://www.englishforums.com/English/comments28-314537.xml</wfw:commentRss><description>Ok..let's consider it as a factor for global warming but not the truth. It does not say: ACTUALLY, THIS IS THE FACTOR, we have got speculations based on these extracts: "He added, however, that the study also showed that over the past 
20 years the number of sunspots had remained roughly constant, while the Earth's 
temperature had continued to increase. 
 This suggested that over the past 20 years, human activities 
such as the burning of fossil fuels and deforestation had begun to dominate "the 
natural factors involved in climate change", he said. Dr Gareth Jones, a climate researcher at the Met Office, said 
that Dr Solanki's findings were INCONCLUSIVE because the study had not 
incorporated other potential climate change...</description></item><item><title>Re: Global Warming: Who is guilty?</title><link>http://www.englishforums.com/English/GlobalWarmingWhoIsGuilty/dmqmp/post.htm#314419</link><pubDate>Sun, 24 May 2009 00:46:53 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">946f00bb-57d3-4b7b-a9a2-059b5341af52:314419</guid><dc:creator>Clive Woodward</dc:creator><slash:comments>30</slash:comments><comments>http://www.englishforums.com/English/GlobalWarmingWhoIsGuilty/dmqmp/post.htm#314419</comments><wfw:commentRss>http://www.englishforums.com/English/comments28-314419.xml</wfw:commentRss><description>Check this out</description></item><item><title>Re: Global Warming: Who is guilty?</title><link>http://www.englishforums.com/English/GlobalWarmingWhoIsGuilty/dmqmp/post.htm#314407</link><pubDate>Sun, 24 May 2009 00:46:53 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">946f00bb-57d3-4b7b-a9a2-059b5341af52:314407</guid><dc:creator>Pidr1nhu</dc:creator><slash:comments>31</slash:comments><comments>http://www.englishforums.com/English/GlobalWarmingWhoIsGuilty/dmqmp/post.htm#314407</comments><wfw:commentRss>http://www.englishforums.com/English/comments28-314407.xml</wfw:commentRss><description>That is the most weird explanation to global warming I have ever heard about...ok opinion expressed.</description></item><item><title>Re: Global Warming: Who is guilty?</title><link>http://www.englishforums.com/English/GlobalWarmingWhoIsGuilty/dmqmp/post.htm#314369</link><pubDate>Tue, 24 Mar 2009 01:46:53 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">946f00bb-57d3-4b7b-a9a2-059b5341af52:314369</guid><dc:creator>Anonymous</dc:creator><slash:comments>32</slash:comments><comments>http://www.englishforums.com/English/GlobalWarmingWhoIsGuilty/dmqmp/post.htm#314369</comments><wfw:commentRss>http://www.englishforums.com/English/comments28-314369.xml</wfw:commentRss><description>Don't Panic! That movie is state terrorism in its most insidious form!  Yes, there is global warming. Are we responsible for it? No! It is the result of a well documented increase in solar activity which is affecting almost every planet in out solar system. Don't panic! Don't feel guilty! Don't jump out of 37th floor window screaming "It's the end of the world" If you really want to do something useful, go and pour a few buckets of water into the nearest smouldering volcano. Seriously! Each large volcanic eruption emits about the same amount of pollution as all the man made emissions in the last one hundred years! Goverments like to keep their people terrified! It makes them more easy to manipulate. Don't worry, be happy.</description></item><item><title>Global Warming: Who is guilty?</title><link>http://www.englishforums.com/English/GlobalWarmingWhoIsGuilty/dmqmp/post.htm</link><pubDate>Fri, 24 Apr 2009 00:46:53 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">946f00bb-57d3-4b7b-a9a2-059b5341af52:314362</guid><dc:creator>Pidr1nhu</dc:creator><slash:comments>33</slash:comments><comments>http://www.englishforums.com/English/GlobalWarmingWhoIsGuilty/dmqmp/post.htm</comments><wfw:commentRss>http://www.englishforums.com/English/comments28-314362.xml</wfw:commentRss><description>Has anybody watched the documentary "An Inconvenient Truth"? You should...it gives an overall look of what is going on in our planet and trace predictions based on present day carbon dioxide emissions. I have just received an alarming message from stopglobalwarming.org which says canadian sea ices are melting faster than thought and a major sea ice has already snaped free in a span of a hour (cientists thought it would it take years and in a matter of a hour everything break free), it was on August 13, 2005. Climate changing was a major contributing factor to this melting and here comes the question: Who is guilty, USA for not approving Kyoto protocol and not reducing their emissions of cabon dioxide, China for not respecting...</description></item></channel></rss>