<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" ?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="http://www.englishforums.com/utility/FeedStylesheets/rss.xsl" media="screen"?><rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/" xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"><channel><title>General English Vocabulary &amp; Idiom Questions</title><link>http://www.englishforums.com/English/GeneralEnglishVocabularyIdiom-Questions/Forum29.htm</link><description>Help with defining words and idioms, and new words and idioms that you've learnt</description><dc:language>en</dc:language><generator>XMOD (Build: 3616.28671)</generator><item><title>Re: proper use of -able as a suffix</title><link>http://www.englishforums.com/English/ProperUseOfAbleAsASuffix/zwxkd/post.htm#461234</link><pubDate>Fri, 27 Mar 2009 00:43:49 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">946f00bb-57d3-4b7b-a9a2-059b5341af52:461234</guid><dc:creator>Philip</dc:creator><slash:comments>0</slash:comments><comments>http://www.englishforums.com/English/ProperUseOfAbleAsASuffix/zwxkd/post.htm#461234</comments><wfw:commentRss>http://www.englishforums.com/English/comments29-461234.xml</wfw:commentRss><description>Delmobile wrote:    I'm afraid I don't know the formal rule, but judging from your examples, both "c" and "g" need the E to stay there to maintain the correct pronunciation. With an A behind them, they become "hard" and the words would be "chain-gah-ble." or "replay-kah-ble."  In the case of "practicable," you will note that the C has indeed become hard - I think this word may come to us via "practical" (useful, sensible) and not "practice." Can a more knowledgeable (omg, I'm doing it without even trying) person help, please?     I think your answer is at least 98% correct.</description></item><item><title>Re: proper use of -able as a suffix</title><link>http://www.englishforums.com/English/ProperUseOfAbleAsASuffix/zwxkd/post.htm#461150</link><pubDate>Sun, 26 Apr 2009 23:43:49 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">946f00bb-57d3-4b7b-a9a2-059b5341af52:461150</guid><dc:creator>Delmobile</dc:creator><slash:comments>1</slash:comments><comments>http://www.englishforums.com/English/ProperUseOfAbleAsASuffix/zwxkd/post.htm#461150</comments><wfw:commentRss>http://www.englishforums.com/English/comments29-461150.xml</wfw:commentRss><description>I'm afraid I don't know the formal rule, but judging from your examples, both "c" and "g" need the E to stay there to maintain the correct pronunciation. With an A behind them, they become "hard" and the words would be "chain-gah-ble." or "replay-kah-ble."  In the case of "practicable," you will note that the C has indeed become hard - I think this word may come to us via "practical" (useful, sensible) and not "practice." Can a more knowledgeable (omg, I'm doing it without even trying) person help, please?</description></item><item><title>proper use of -able as a suffix</title><link>http://www.englishforums.com/English/ProperUseOfAbleAsASuffix/zwxkd/post.htm</link><pubDate>Tue, 26 May 2009 23:43:49 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">946f00bb-57d3-4b7b-a9a2-059b5341af52:461128</guid><dc:creator>maysam</dc:creator><slash:comments>2</slash:comments><comments>http://www.englishforums.com/English/ProperUseOfAbleAsASuffix/zwxkd/post.htm</comments><wfw:commentRss>http://www.englishforums.com/English/comments29-461128.xml</wfw:commentRss><description>Hi dudes I don't know if we should omit the letter 'e' from the end of verbs after appending an '-able' suffix to them. Sometimes I have seen that 'e' is not removed from the end of the verb, like: replace + able = replaceable change + able = changeable and sometimes it's removed: achieve + able = achievable practice + able = practicable Do you know what the rule is?</description></item></channel></rss>