<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" ?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="http://www.englishforums.com/utility/FeedStylesheets/rss.xsl" media="screen"?><rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/" xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"><channel><title>Legal English</title><link>http://www.englishforums.com/English/LegalEnglish/Forum34.htm</link><description>International law and specific national laws can be discussed here.</description><dc:language>en</dc:language><generator>XMOD (Build: 3607.32596)</generator><item><title>Re: Free vs for free</title><link>http://www.englishforums.com/English/FreeVsForFree/3/bhbgv/Post.htm#803404</link><pubDate>Thu, 02 Jul 2009 19:13:48 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">946f00bb-57d3-4b7b-a9a2-059b5341af52:803404</guid><dc:creator>Anonymous</dc:creator><slash:comments>0</slash:comments><comments>http://www.englishforums.com/English/FreeVsForFree/3/bhbgv/Post.htm#803404</comments><wfw:commentRss>http://www.englishforums.com/English/comments34-803404.xml</wfw:commentRss><description>&amp;gt;&amp;gt;&amp;quot;In the second place, &amp;#39;for&amp;#39; is a preposition and can only be followed by a noun or &amp;gt;&amp;gt;pronoun.&amp;quot;    Then what about &amp;quot;for richer or for poorer&amp;quot;?</description></item><item><title>Re: Free vs for free</title><link>http://www.englishforums.com/English/FreeVsForFree/3/bhbgv/Post.htm#683894</link><pubDate>Sat, 07 Mar 2009 03:13:00 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">946f00bb-57d3-4b7b-a9a2-059b5341af52:683894</guid><dc:creator>Anonymous</dc:creator><slash:comments>1</slash:comments><comments>http://www.englishforums.com/English/FreeVsForFree/3/bhbgv/Post.htm#683894</comments><wfw:commentRss>http://www.englishforums.com/English/comments34-683894.xml</wfw:commentRss><description>I agree. This &amp;quot;for free&amp;quot; is a slang term that drives me up a wall. I work for a daily newspaper and asked the writing coach about it. He echoed what Grammar Granny wrote above.</description></item><item><title>Re: Free vs for free</title><link>http://www.englishforums.com/English/FreeVsForFree/2/bhbgv/Post.htm#467464</link><pubDate>Fri, 22 May 2009 01:02:25 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">946f00bb-57d3-4b7b-a9a2-059b5341af52:467464</guid><dc:creator>Alienvoord</dc:creator><slash:comments>2</slash:comments><comments>http://www.englishforums.com/English/FreeVsForFree/2/bhbgv/Post.htm#467464</comments><wfw:commentRss>http://www.englishforums.com/English/comments34-467464.xml</wfw:commentRss><description>Grammar Granny wrote:    I was told by a professional editor that 'for free' was incorrect, no matter how much it is in common use.     They must have a strange definition of "incorrect".      In the first place it is redundant.     Redundancy needs some better PR. These are all redundant: three different ways start over again These five passages have not been picked out because they are especially bad... I number them so that I can refer back to them - Orwell, Politics and the English Language  There are places where we cannot substitute "free" for "for free". Well we can, but it gives a different meaning: 1a It seemed best to find a way to live for free. 1b It seemed best to find a way to live free 2a The hat they throw in extra for...</description></item><item><title>Re: Free vs for free</title><link>http://www.englishforums.com/English/FreeVsForFree/2/bhbgv/Post.htm#465934</link><pubDate>Thu, 22 Jan 2009 02:02:25 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">946f00bb-57d3-4b7b-a9a2-059b5341af52:465934</guid><dc:creator>Grammar Geek</dc:creator><slash:comments>3</slash:comments><comments>http://www.englishforums.com/English/FreeVsForFree/2/bhbgv/Post.htm#465934</comments><wfw:commentRss>http://www.englishforums.com/English/comments34-465934.xml</wfw:commentRss><description>Interesting. I would have said one the first things you learn in a good communications course is the importance of understanding your audience and making sure you select the words and medium most likely to make your message understood. I would have thought they'd save things like that for the "pedantic editing" section of the course and not put that up front.</description></item><item><title>Re: Free vs for free</title><link>http://www.englishforums.com/English/FreeVsForFree/2/bhbgv/Post.htm#465930</link><pubDate>Sun, 22 Mar 2009 02:02:25 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">946f00bb-57d3-4b7b-a9a2-059b5341af52:465930</guid><dc:creator>Anonymous</dc:creator><slash:comments>4</slash:comments><comments>http://www.englishforums.com/English/FreeVsForFree/2/bhbgv/Post.htm#465930</comments><wfw:commentRss>http://www.englishforums.com/English/comments34-465930.xml</wfw:commentRss><description>It's free, not for free it's one of the first things you learn in a (good) communications course.</description></item><item><title>Re: Free vs for free</title><link>http://www.englishforums.com/English/FreeVsForFree/2/bhbgv/Post.htm#459393</link><pubDate>Fri, 22 May 2009 01:02:25 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">946f00bb-57d3-4b7b-a9a2-059b5341af52:459393</guid><dc:creator>Hummingbird</dc:creator><slash:comments>5</slash:comments><comments>http://www.englishforums.com/English/FreeVsForFree/2/bhbgv/Post.htm#459393</comments><wfw:commentRss>http://www.englishforums.com/English/comments34-459393.xml</wfw:commentRss><description>I think since native speakers normally say it, one can speak it but not use it in writing.</description></item><item><title>Re: Free vs for free</title><link>http://www.englishforums.com/English/FreeVsForFree/2/bhbgv/Post.htm#457833</link><pubDate>Sun, 22 Feb 2009 02:02:25 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">946f00bb-57d3-4b7b-a9a2-059b5341af52:457833</guid><dc:creator>Lawyee</dc:creator><slash:comments>6</slash:comments><comments>http://www.englishforums.com/English/FreeVsForFree/2/bhbgv/Post.htm#457833</comments><wfw:commentRss>http://www.englishforums.com/English/comments34-457833.xml</wfw:commentRss><description>Since this is a legal section of the Forum, it should be noted that none of the aforementioned should be used in legal texts. They are not proper and accurate enough (although "free" is gramatically correct). Try to use "without consideration" or "free of charge" instead. By the way, what is free of charge... except of diseases maybe?</description></item><item><title>Re: Free vs for free</title><link>http://www.englishforums.com/English/FreeVsForFree/2/bhbgv/Post.htm#457706</link><pubDate>Fri, 22 May 2009 01:02:25 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">946f00bb-57d3-4b7b-a9a2-059b5341af52:457706</guid><dc:creator>Anonymous</dc:creator><slash:comments>7</slash:comments><comments>http://www.englishforums.com/English/FreeVsForFree/2/bhbgv/Post.htm#457706</comments><wfw:commentRss>http://www.englishforums.com/English/comments34-457706.xml</wfw:commentRss><description>Three cheers for Grammar Granny. Free is correct. For free is POOR GRAMMAR and shouldn't be used. Grammar needs to be brought back into elementary schools. The problem is that there are probably not enough teachers who understand the english language.</description></item><item><title>Re: Free vs for free</title><link>http://www.englishforums.com/English/FreeVsForFree/2/bhbgv/Post.htm#235427</link><pubDate>Sun, 22 Feb 2009 02:02:25 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">946f00bb-57d3-4b7b-a9a2-059b5341af52:235427</guid><dc:creator>Clive</dc:creator><slash:comments>8</slash:comments><comments>http://www.englishforums.com/English/FreeVsForFree/2/bhbgv/Post.htm#235427</comments><wfw:commentRss>http://www.englishforums.com/English/comments34-235427.xml</wfw:commentRss><description>Hi guys, 
 I think that people who say 'He got it for free' are mistakenly influenced by the structure 'He got it for five dollars'. 
 Best wishes, Clive</description></item><item><title>Re: Free vs for free</title><link>http://www.englishforums.com/English/FreeVsForFree/2/bhbgv/Post.htm#235327</link><pubDate>Thu, 22 Jan 2009 02:02:25 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">946f00bb-57d3-4b7b-a9a2-059b5341af52:235327</guid><dc:creator>Anonymous</dc:creator><slash:comments>9</slash:comments><comments>http://www.englishforums.com/English/FreeVsForFree/2/bhbgv/Post.htm#235327</comments><wfw:commentRss>http://www.englishforums.com/English/comments34-235327.xml</wfw:commentRss><description>I agree. You cannot get something for a state of being. It's either free or not. Same with free gift. All gifts are free or they're not gifts, right?</description></item><item><title>Re: Free vs for free</title><link>http://www.englishforums.com/English/FreeVsForFree/2/bhbgv/Post.htm#148815</link><pubDate>Sun, 22 Mar 2009 02:02:25 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">946f00bb-57d3-4b7b-a9a2-059b5341af52:148815</guid><dc:creator>Citox</dc:creator><slash:comments>10</slash:comments><comments>http://www.englishforums.com/English/FreeVsForFree/2/bhbgv/Post.htm#148815</comments><wfw:commentRss>http://www.englishforums.com/English/comments34-148815.xml</wfw:commentRss><description>I think A is right.by the way ,a question for julielai,are you chinese? if you are,please contact me i'm a boy in beijing</description></item><item><title>Re: Free vs for free</title><link>http://www.englishforums.com/English/FreeVsForFree/bhbgv/post.htm#130170</link><pubDate>Sun, 22 Mar 2009 02:02:25 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">946f00bb-57d3-4b7b-a9a2-059b5341af52:130170</guid><dc:creator>Grammar Granny</dc:creator><slash:comments>11</slash:comments><comments>http://www.englishforums.com/English/FreeVsForFree/bhbgv/post.htm#130170</comments><wfw:commentRss>http://www.englishforums.com/English/comments34-130170.xml</wfw:commentRss><description>I was told by a professional editor that 'for free' was incorrect, no matter how much it is in common use. In the first place it is redundant. Either something is free or it costs something. Saying it is for free means it doesn't, doesn't cost anything. In the second place, 'for' is a preposition and can only be followed by a noun or pronoun. 'Free' can be either an adjective or a verb, but not a noun or pronoun. Any time an ad or a website uses this phrase, I doubt its validity.</description></item><item><title>Re: Free vs for free</title><link>http://www.englishforums.com/English/FreeVsForFree/bhbgv/post.htm#127842</link><pubDate>Wed, 22 Apr 2009 01:02:25 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">946f00bb-57d3-4b7b-a9a2-059b5341af52:127842</guid><dc:creator>Forbes</dc:creator><slash:comments>12</slash:comments><comments>http://www.englishforums.com/English/FreeVsForFree/bhbgv/post.htm#127842</comments><wfw:commentRss>http://www.englishforums.com/English/comments34-127842.xml</wfw:commentRss><description>David wrote:    Both are used.    
 Can't disagree with you there. The point is perhaps which is felt to be more appropriate for formal use at the present time. I just "felt" that "free" was better and the dictionary I happen to own agrees with me by saying that "for free" is non-standard. As with many words and phrases the non-standard one may become standard and eventually replace or stand alongside the originally preferred one. Since this is the legal forum I would venture to suggest that many lawyers' preferences would be for the more conservative form.</description></item><item><title>Re: Free vs for free</title><link>http://www.englishforums.com/English/FreeVsForFree/bhbgv/post.htm#127762</link><pubDate>Thu, 22 Jan 2009 02:02:25 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">946f00bb-57d3-4b7b-a9a2-059b5341af52:127762</guid><dc:creator>David</dc:creator><slash:comments>13</slash:comments><comments>http://www.englishforums.com/English/FreeVsForFree/bhbgv/post.htm#127762</comments><wfw:commentRss>http://www.englishforums.com/English/comments34-127762.xml</wfw:commentRss><description>Both are used.</description></item><item><title>Re: Free vs for free</title><link>http://www.englishforums.com/English/FreeVsForFree/bhbgv/post.htm#127700</link><pubDate>Fri, 22 May 2009 01:02:25 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">946f00bb-57d3-4b7b-a9a2-059b5341af52:127700</guid><dc:creator>Forbes</dc:creator><slash:comments>14</slash:comments><comments>http://www.englishforums.com/English/FreeVsForFree/bhbgv/post.htm#127700</comments><wfw:commentRss>http://www.englishforums.com/English/comments34-127700.xml</wfw:commentRss><description>TimKowal wrote:    However, here is a problem with that type of analysis     
 I agree entirely that that type of analysis does not work when you look at something seriously, but it does help to make a point sometimes.</description></item><item><title>Re: Free vs for free</title><link>http://www.englishforums.com/English/FreeVsForFree/bhbgv/post.htm#127071</link><pubDate>Sun, 22 Mar 2009 02:02:25 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">946f00bb-57d3-4b7b-a9a2-059b5341af52:127071</guid><dc:creator>TimKowal</dc:creator><slash:comments>15</slash:comments><comments>http://www.englishforums.com/English/FreeVsForFree/bhbgv/post.htm#127071</comments><wfw:commentRss>http://www.englishforums.com/English/comments34-127071.xml</wfw:commentRss><description>I say that simply "free" is more correct, but not absolutely correct. I
liked the analysis that said that "for free" translates into "for for
free." However, here is a problem with that type of analysis: 
 
Another dictionary definition says "free" means "without charge."  American Heritage® Dictionary of the English Language, Fourth Edition. 
Analyzing the usage of free is not as simple as plugging in the
dictionary defintion, because if we did so, then we could not say "free
of charge," since this would become "free of charge without
charge." This is nonsense, of course, so we have to abandon this
analysis.  
 
I prefer to think of "free" as "without constraint." We can talk
about being free of social constraints, free of...</description></item><item><title>Re: Free vs for free</title><link>http://www.englishforums.com/English/FreeVsForFree/bhbgv/post.htm#122383</link><pubDate>Fri, 22 May 2009 01:02:25 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">946f00bb-57d3-4b7b-a9a2-059b5341af52:122383</guid><dc:creator>Forbes</dc:creator><slash:comments>16</slash:comments><comments>http://www.englishforums.com/English/FreeVsForFree/bhbgv/post.htm#122383</comments><wfw:commentRss>http://www.englishforums.com/English/comments34-122383.xml</wfw:commentRss><description>I feel the opposite. In this context "free" means "for nothing" and so "for free" is equivalent to "for for free". I checked in my dictionary ( Collins ) which indicated that "for free" is non-standard.</description></item><item><title>Re: Free vs for free</title><link>http://www.englishforums.com/English/FreeVsForFree/bhbgv/post.htm#118658</link><pubDate>Sun, 22 Feb 2009 02:02:25 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">946f00bb-57d3-4b7b-a9a2-059b5341af52:118658</guid><dc:creator>Robert B. Mercer</dc:creator><slash:comments>17</slash:comments><comments>http://www.englishforums.com/English/FreeVsForFree/bhbgv/post.htm#118658</comments><wfw:commentRss>http://www.englishforums.com/English/comments34-118658.xml</wfw:commentRss><description>I agree with JulieLai, I believe that "you can get it free" is a slang shorting for the correct "you can get it for free"...</description></item><item><title>Re: Free vs for free</title><link>http://www.englishforums.com/English/FreeVsForFree/bhbgv/post.htm#118456</link><pubDate>Wed, 22 Apr 2009 01:02:25 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">946f00bb-57d3-4b7b-a9a2-059b5341af52:118456</guid><dc:creator>julielai</dc:creator><slash:comments>18</slash:comments><comments>http://www.englishforums.com/English/FreeVsForFree/bhbgv/post.htm#118456</comments><wfw:commentRss>http://www.englishforums.com/English/comments34-118456.xml</wfw:commentRss><description>I normally say A.</description></item><item><title>Free vs for free</title><link>http://www.englishforums.com/English/FreeVsForFree/bhbgv/post.htm</link><pubDate>Thu, 22 Jan 2009 02:02:25 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">946f00bb-57d3-4b7b-a9a2-059b5341af52:118307</guid><dc:creator>Anonymous</dc:creator><slash:comments>19</slash:comments><comments>http://www.englishforums.com/English/FreeVsForFree/bhbgv/post.htm</comments><wfw:commentRss>http://www.englishforums.com/English/comments34-118307.xml</wfw:commentRss><description>Which is proper English? 
 A) You can get it for free . 
 or 
 B) You can get it free .</description></item></channel></rss>