http://www.englishforums.com/English/BasicEnglishGrammarQuestions/Forum43.htmFor Basic English ONLY. Please post only <b><font color=red>easy</font></b> questions and answers here.enXMOD (Build: 3616.28671)http://www.englishforums.com/English/HasHave/vplhg/post.htm#411147Tue, 26 May 2009 16:01:42 GMT946f00bb-57d3-4b7b-a9a2-059b5341af52:411147Mister Micawber0http://www.englishforums.com/English/HasHave/vplhg/post.htm#411147http://www.englishforums.com/English/comments43-411147.xmlNo, you are wrong, Anonymous.http://www.englishforums.com/English/HasHave/vplhg/post.htm#411134Mon, 26 Jan 2009 17:01:42 GMT946f00bb-57d3-4b7b-a9a2-059b5341af52:411134Anonymous1http://www.englishforums.com/English/HasHave/vplhg/post.htm#411134http://www.englishforums.com/English/comments43-411134.xmlFormally, it should be have.http://www.englishforums.com/English/HasHave/vplhg/post.htm#411124Thu, 26 Feb 2009 17:01:42 GMT946f00bb-57d3-4b7b-a9a2-059b5341af52:411124Mister Micawber2http://www.englishforums.com/English/HasHave/vplhg/post.htm#411124http://www.englishforums.com/English/comments43-411124.xmlNot really, though it is possible. The writer obviously thinks that 'vilification and assassination' are parts of the same single act, and I tend to agree.http://www.englishforums.com/English/HasHave/vplhg/post.htmThu, 26 Feb 2009 17:01:42 GMT946f00bb-57d3-4b7b-a9a2-059b5341af52:411083Anonymous3http://www.englishforums.com/English/HasHave/vplhg/post.htmhttp://www.englishforums.com/English/comments43-411083.xmlAm I am correct in saying that the highlighted HAS(S) should be replaced by have? Thanks 'I think the cruel vilification and character assassination of ZIggy by BB and its spin-off programmes HAS gone far enough and HAS overstepped the bounds of human decency and dignity'