Soulwhisper wrote: first of all....hi am a new member here from saudi arabia...and am taking morphology...and i have few questions need answers . first what can we consider the word..writings..in the sentence HIS WRITINGS WAS PUBLISHED IN

first of all....hi am a new member here from saudi arabia...and am taking morphology...and i have few questions need answers . first what can we consider the word..writings..in the sentence HIS WRITINGS WAS PUBLISHED IN ...is it right to say its

Hi Fred! I hope I'm going to have right: I attend university as well as you majoring English and American studeis in Hungary. have you ever heard about derivation. Now "disillusionment" is one of it. There ae certain types of it, for

"Some modern anthropologists hold that biological evolution has shaped not only human morphology but also human behavior. The role those anthropologists ascribe to evolution is not of dictating the details of human behavior but one of imposing

As to your question about the affix -ic , well, language works in different ways and makes use of different methods of word formation. Not all the words derive the same way, have a closer look at your mother tongue and you'll see for yourself.

LETTER OF MOTIVATION Dear Sir/ Madam, I wish to apply for PhD program *** Germany, starting in March 2006. This degree would assist me to start my career as a scientist, preparing to work in a team as well as to carry on my

Hi Swappy, welcome to EF. Some things that I have fixed: to (not too ) your PhD program would assist my career scientist, preparing work in a team There are several career: (1) the process of

could plz anyone check my letter and give me suggestion! thanking you. I am sorry about to many ***. Dear Sir/ Madam, I wish too apply for PhD program in *** Germany, starting in *** 2006. This degree would help me to start my career as a

Hi all Hi TS. As you said, we don't know how to define present and future. But we can strictly define a grammatical category , in terms of morphology. A grammatical category consists of a paradigmatic opposition of morphological forms. Thus we

Hello, please let me put in a word here! You all have presented own standpoint clearly, and I feel like getting my ideas in order, too. As I said earlier I'm not a linguist yet, so I myself want to know my standpoint. These terms (i.e. grammar,