No, "with Latia" does not create an indirect object situation. If you GAVE your homework TO Latia, she is the indirect object. The homework moved from you to her. In this case, you worked with Latia to do your homework Latia is he object of the

I get it,but then I get confused. For example: I did my homework with latia Did- is the verb , homework- indirect object, Latia- is direct object

Despite the similarity to a direct object-indirect object structure, this is not that pattern. This sentence has a direct object and an object complement. ( it and a menacing place , respectively) Verbs which take this kind of structure

what are the direct and indirect objects of this statement "i understood why the porter had called it a menacing place." my guess is: it - indirect object menacing place - direct object thank you

User_gary wrote: Anonymous wrote: what is the object of this sentence "i understood why the porter had called it a menacing place" This is my guess : it -------- Indirect object a menacing place -------- direct object

Anonymous wrote: what is the object of this sentence "i understood why the porter had called it a menacing place" This is my guess : it -------- Indirect object a menacing place -------- direct object

wish can take an indirect object as shown in the first example. I wish you good health. I'm wishing you good fortune. He wished me good luck. They are all correct. wish ... for with an indirect object would be separated by the direct object,

Anon, "u" need to ask more specific questions if you want some help. What don't you understand? She sent a letter to Peter. Can you name the subject, the direct object, and the indirect object?

CalifJim wrote: Original question: What do you think of the usage of '' TO' ' following tell. Is it a , or a possible usage? Answer: I think the usage of to is fine, as explained above and below. The to is, however, optional, as explained

ugh! i need help too! i dont get iiiiiittttttt!!! wen u get a reply would u mind telin me bout' it?