By Word order

Your first sentence is correct. If you write "to" instead of "for", I'd change the word order to "when does the last train to Brooklyn leave?"

Goodman wrote:Away from Google, “He is in troubles again with the laws” is not a wrong sentence and I am saying this with conviction. Sorry Goodman, but my very sincere and adamant advice to you is that you should say that with considerably less conviction. A natural and correct version of...

Hi, 1. Does it mean that using 'in which' still keep the subordinate clause as an adjectival clause? Yes. You can see this better if you change the word order to say, rather awkwardly, they talked about the way which Mary dressed in. 2. Why when we are using 'how', the subordinate clause will...

Yes, you can lose the comma, but no, the original word order is poor, as it places glimpses nearer television than stories, thus confusing the referent.

Hi,can someone explain how to use same and exact or exactly in the same sentence? I'm not sure of the word order......the same exact......the exact same......exactly the same......the exactly same......etc.Thanks in advance

Yankee wrote:I agree with Goodman but would like to add that this word order would also be very common:I was wondering what the difference between a planet and a star was / is. Hi allStrictly speaking, this is the only grammatically correct sentence but I accept all the others as well because...

Hi HazmaI agree with Goodman but would like to add that this word order would also be very common:I was wondering what the difference between a planet and a star was / is.

Kittixay wrote: we use "another" for one thing , and "other" for two things or more. Is it correct or not?Hmmm, no. You can say "another three apples", or "three other apples". Notice the word order. Also, "another" can mean "one + other": I need one other egg ---> I need another egg.That's...

I see nothing wrong with your sentences. There are other possibilities; for instance, if you were a pop star or a famous writer, you might say People who love me... without the article. This would imply you have lots of "lovers".You have resorted to variety yourself by using a different word...

The grammatical mistake is in the word order. "Inversion after an initial negative" rule. Neither is he ill-mannered, nor is he dishonest. Alternately, put the subject first: He is neither ill-mannered nor dishonest. You can do more than one nor, but that's not very common. CJ