1. first option 2. she is more than pretty enough... 3. you do 4. You will get not only enough money from the deal but also praise... (parallel construction)

In other words, I thought that, as an object (noun), I should use the verb in the -ing form, and not in the infinitive. Actually, the infinitive can also serve the function of a noun and be an object. It depends on the verb. Note, below, how the

not only / but also construction requires parallel structure. I would say: She not only dropped the wine but also broke the glass.

I find the repetition of about inadvisable Thanks again. I understand what you are saying. However, in an example of your sentence, placing 'not only' after 'a matter of' may lead to the construction of 'a matter of A and

another BE + OF construction I have found. Could anyone explain it to me? "Biological clocks are of such obvious adaptive value to living organisms, that we would expect most organisms to possess them." what does the of mean?

Dear sir, This is NABIL DALVI, i have recently taken admission in NICMAR (DISTANCE EDUCATION ) in POST GRADUATION PROGRAMME IN PROJECT MANAGEMENT BUT I WANT IT TO BE CHANGED TO CONSTRUCTION MANAGEMENT..The reason for the same is that while

#1 works; #2 does not. I suppose that is because 'it' is existential.

Hello, Pleasehelp, How many pieces of T-shirts do you want? is decidedly ungrammatical: *pieces of T-shirts is a partitive construction (featuring partition in respect of quantity). The partitive a piece of is used with words denoting an

Dear friend, the first set of examples is quite correct grammatically, no doubt, representing the pattern verb + object + to-infinitive complementation . In this case, passivization is possible, though some constraints still apply even to this

Raja, let me make a number of essential clarifications: 1. ' Hence , that the 'do'-construction in "Who went to the park?" is not possible or at least less preferable (which of the two is it in your opinion?) in "Who