In Semicolons^x, Commas^x

So would I. "It's about the children, not (about) you".

I'll write "It's about the children, not you". paco

Which is correct, "It's about the children, not you." or "It's about the children; not you."

Hmm...what say you? Well, I did a bit more research, NG, and since these are some of the definitions: Cladding -- A protective covering that protects the outside of a building. A metal coating bonded onto another metal under high pressure and temperature. A protective or...

Your original is a comma-splice sentence (two-- no, three-- complete sentences separated by commas but no conjunction), but it is acceptable in popular writing; in formal composition, a semicolon or period is called for (the same holds for your third clause-- blurry figures conduct the...

Hi, I have added some comments in blue . Thanks for taking the initiative again , (No comma. Use ', and' instead) I suggest a period here, the two sentences don't seem closely related this seems to be a good place. I think in your last proposal you mentioned that each individual would...

I don't think you need a semicolon. I wouldn't replace either comma with one. It sounds like you are listing what the Radiant company did, so I think your choice of commas is correct.

The first should have a semicolon in place of the comma.(comma splice sentence) The second should have no comma. (restrictive clause) The third needs commas before which and after frequently . (non-restrictive clause)

Hi Amused Medusa. Which comma did your instructor think should be a semicolon?

Hi, My instructor disagrees with my choice of a comma instead of a semicolon. Could you take a look at the following sentance and check my punctuation? Thanks! Radiant eliminated half their workforce, conserved their cash, hired a new development team and 18 months later introduced...