We have partnered with TradePub to bring you free industry magazines and resources - no coupons or credit cards required!
Visit: englishforums.tradepub.com
-
I believe only one sentence of the two is grammarly grammatically correct. Both are correct. You can use either one, and they both have the same meaning. I would use the one with the present tense in a situation where I wanted to give the
-
" The reason (that) I'm ringing is to ask a favour. "
What is "that" in this sentence referring back to ? reason. ( that takes the place of for which , where which refers back to reason .) that I'm ringing is not
-
Dear friend, passivization is impossible in some instances. The example you refer to features a to-infinitive clause as a direct object, and in this case passive becomes unacceptable: *To eat mango is wanted by him. Respectfully, Gleb Chebrikoff
-
In certain short clauses, commas are probably not necessary (as in Dimsum's last sentence), but certainly where it appears e.g. in a subject noun phrase, it is appositive (not 'parenthetical'), as the verb number is governed by the subject itself:
-
What do you think of this rewording: - That we can't afford it is the simple reason we aren't going. It occurs in informal speech, as you know. In no way does it change the grammatical nature of that, of course. I cannot think of relative
-
Is as well as considered a parenthical phrase? Should it be set off with commas?
Thanks!
My non-linguistic view thinks not. I may be wrong but one of the "as well as" usages has a prepositional property which is typically
ESL General English Grammar Questions
by
dimsumexpress
2 days ago 7:55 pm
Articles, Prepositions, Clauses, Commas, Punctuation, Relationships, Writing, Business, Usages, Friendships, Careers, Friends
-
That is a conjunction in the second sentence, not a relative pronoun! I agree. More specifically I'd call it a complementizer. It makes the clause we can't afford it subordinate. In any case, that has no antecedent in the preceding text
-
Hi, Pernickety.
I hate beating dead horses, but a revisit to this clause tells me I didn't explain myself.
The problem is the nature of the verb "to prepare." In your example, it describes what may well be a long
-
2. They are always asking me how studious a student should be to prepare for the finals Hi, Pernickety. I hate beating dead horses, but a revisit to this clause tells me I didn't explain myself. The problem is the nature of the verb "to
-
I remember the day that he came.
We aren’t going for the simple reason that we can’t afford it.
Is 'that' used as an adverb in the above sentences ? In the first sentence that is indeed adverbial in character, which is obvious if we
- English Test
How to Write a Letter Idioms Formal Letter Graduation Songs
Who sings a certain song
|
Ask a question right now..
|