Few is used with countable nouns and less with uncountable nouns. The noun following the first blank is women, which is a countable noun; so, fewer is the correct word to use there. Since we have used the comparative form of few, i.e., fewer,

Use an uncountable noun in that structure; for plural foods, reverse the structure: ' Beans are my favorite food.'

So because most is an inanimate object and inanimate objects are uncountable nouns so it's doesn't

I don't , he/she doesn't. Hair has nothing to do with the form of the verb in your sentence. However I did write hair has and not hair have because hair is an uncountable (singular) noun.

I don't have much hair. Why is it don't and not doesn't? Isn't hair a uncountable noun so shouldn't it be singular?

1-- an instance of deadness 2-- alternate amplifications = other explanations/elucidations. All these can be used as countable nouns.

Hi. When reading a piece of text, I sometimes see words that seem uncountable used countably. I have come to realize (if I learned it correctly) -- mainly through these forums -- that an uncountably noun could be used countably if it is used as an

No. Few clothes. 'Clothes' is not uncountable, it is just a plural form that has no singular.

1. what's the quality 1. use get s in both cases. We usually consider cheese an uncountable noun.

Thanks for the reply . It's also a senstive matter in the culture i live. My friend translated a subtitle of a documentary film. It related to a transgender community. Then i watched the movie. I read the subtitle and i found this sentence: