Hi, rishila, welcome to English Forums. Thanks for joining us! The use of "do" is a little hard to get used to. I'm not sure what you mean by "for pronoun only." It's used a lot in questions and negative statements.

Hi No, I'm afraid it's not correct. The problem is your use of the verb 'go'. You tried to use the negative form of the simple past tense and wrongly assumed it was 'did not went'. This is a tricky aspect of

What is the one word for the habit of discussing about others in their absence usually in a negative way?.

thank you and if its a negative for 5 would it be? I won't give you even up, dollar to euro.??? and for 3 is it both IN and THROUGH? thank you

"overextended" is probably the best approximation. "very extensive" in any case. Yes, it has at least a slightly negative connotation. In some cases -- and it depends, as always, on context -- it has a very negative connotation

"With Pox Americana, Fenn crafts a sprawling narrative detailing the overlooked smallpox epidemic of 1775-1782 in the Americas and the tumultuous times of revolution that surrounded it." What does a " sprawling "

Could you tell me which word to use please? 1 That's when I'm best/I'm my best player. 2 He called just/only to fold post flop. 3 Food fell on/onto the bed. 4 How many people do you have room for?/You have room for how many people? 5

Is the sentence a flection of attitude? If it is, what's the attitude?(I guess it is negative.) Thanks in advance.

- Here are some tips parents can take to help reduce television's negative effect on their children : Watch televison with your child - too often TV is used as a cheap babysitter. Know what your child is watching and don't be afraid to

No. To build the simple past tense of a verb in a negative sentence, you use did + not + base form of the verb So, your sentence is correct this way: - I did not want him to come.