When a relative pronoun is separated from its antecedent, it is called a REMOTE RELATIVE. Usage experts suggest that the sentence be rephrased so that the relative pronoun immediately follows the antecedent. This makes it easier for the listener/

The use of lie detectors is based on the assumption that lying produces emotional reaction s in an individual that , in turn, create unconscious physiological responses. I have never heard of a rule about the antecedents of reltive pronouns. You

hello teachers I suppose relative pronouns follow the nearest antecedent The use of lie detectors is based on the assumption that lying produces emotional reactions in an individual that , in turn, create unconscious physiological

"A survey by the national council of Churches showed that in 1986 there were 20,736 female ministers, almost 9 percent of the nation's clergy, a number double that of 1977" 'that' is a relative pronoun used as object

"A survey by national council of Churches showed that in 1986 there were 20,736 females ministers, almost 9 percent of the nation's clergy, a number double that of 1977 " Is there any error in this sentence-specially with usage of

My humble contribution: after "which," remove "it." "Which" is a relative pronoun referring to the whole sentence "A soul ...rock radio." It means "which fact," i e., the fact that "A soul

"The man who she thought was still alive had in fact already died." The way I would parse that sentence is "___ she thought" is a noun clause collectively acting as the subject of the verb "was." Within that clause,

Hi, which one is more appropriate and why I wouldn't call one more appropriate than the other. I mean do participle reduce redundancy It's slightly fewer words, if that's what you mean. Clive

which one is more appropriate and why I mean do participle reduce redundancy  Regards

which one is more appropriate and why I mean do participle reduce redundancy  Regards