The first is odd, the second is possible, but I much prefer the third: Woman: without her, man is nothing. Use a colon to indicate following material explaining or exemplifying the material before the colon. Use a semicolon like a period; it

Which of these sentences is correct and could you please tell me when the colon or the semicolon is used in everyday grammar? Woman. Without her, man is nothing. Or. Woman! Without her, man is nothing. Or possibly. Woman: without her,

Only these: change the semicolon to a comma after 'Dreamweaver' and change 'experiences' to ' experience '.

I don't see the need for any punctuation other than the quotes and period. The comma might be used by some, but to me it is optional. I would like to use the same sentence structure with "should" as the first word of the sentence.

I'd use the first sentence.

In this sentence, what punctuation should i use? I would like to use the same sentence structure, with "should" as the first word of the sentence. I would like to use the same sentence structure: with "should" as the first

In this sentence, what punctuation should i use? I would like to use the same sentence structure, with should as the first word of the sentence. I would like to use the same sentence structure: with should as the first word of the sentence. I

Hi. From "From The 6 Rules/Commandments of Commas," which was provided by Anon, would say the letter C sentence is correct without a comma after what I think is the conjunctive adverb "therefore." Is it (or is it not) a fixed

Hi. I think I sometimes see sentences in which a semicolon seems to be used in place of a comma for a reason I can imagine but can't know definitely. Can you help? The document describes the people who attended the seminar yesterday;

If 'for example' is in the middle of the sentence, the comma preceding the phrase is necessary. But after it, it is not necessary, unless you feel it will rid the sentence of ambiguities. Generally, it will be left out and the next comma