Hi! A quick question; Do you use to/at in this sentence? "They only had japan left to defeat to put the war at/to an end" Thank you!

Hello! Everyone, I am a typical modern Chinese girl---outgoing,sociable,approachable.As a travel buff, I wanna travel all over the world.. Happy to make friends from other culture~~~

Hello. I wrote two dialogues. Will you correct them? No. 1 M: You seem to have forgotten to make a plan for the next week. F: I'm afraid there's been some change. We've decided to send you to Moscow. M: Hmmm.

It was the fitting into Confucian patterns of conduct and of family and community life rather than blood kinship or ancestry which labeled one as civilized and as Chinese. The sentence is correct and your analysis is right. It is a preparatory

Hi everyone, In the following sentences below, what do you think the subject of the last sentence is? Just "It" or the words "which labeled one as civilized and as Chinese"? I'm confused whether the

Yes... and I think that people would say " I very happy " instead of " I happy " - an adverb is required here.

Hmm, your observation is partially correct. There's no "is" in context such as this in Chinese, contexts that involves attributes, conditions, situations etc. (there may be more, but that's all I can think of now. Maybe other

And, the "is" is needed if the adj. is followed by a noun: He is a nice person ( equivalent to "he very nice" ) also needed when there's no adjective: The Sun is a sphere

This is interesting... I think if that person meant "he looks like an giant", it should be something like "he very big" / "he quite big" / "he so big" / "he really big" - translated

Nice to meet you! I actually have never gone to China before! Why do you think that I have been in China before? Bye!