Anonymous wrote: Although Chinese syllable structure is as you suggest, this is completely different from the importance of word structure. Words in Chinese are composed of a single syllable, whereas words in English and Spanish can be composed

Soulwhisper wrote: first of all....hi am a new member here from saudi arabia...and am taking morphology...and i have few questions need answers . first what can we consider the word..writings..in the sentence HIS WRITINGS WAS PUBLISHED IN

first of all....hi am a new member here from saudi arabia...and am taking morphology...and i have few questions need answers . first what can we consider the word..writings..in the sentence HIS WRITINGS WAS PUBLISHED IN ...is it right to say its

Hi Guys, By definition: prefix is a type of affix that precedes the morphemes to which it can attach. A suffix is an affix that succeeds the morphemes to which it can attach. So when you say 700 MiB, is "MiB" really a prefix or a suffix?

hello friends.i have to do a task homework..would you please help me? thank you consider what problems of analysis ,or recognition,or of relating them to other forms of same word a learner might have with them.for example: word: redemption

This is interesting, IMO: Background on Grammaticalization (8) Grammaticalization makes use of the "observation that grammatical morphemes develop gradually out of lexical morphemes or combinations of lexical morphemes with lexical or

Hela wrote: The sun shone bright . Hello Hela As Prof. KoM told, " bright " in "The shone bright" is a true adverb and it is synonymous to " brightly ". In the time of Old English (AD 600 - AD 900), it was a rule to form adverbs by adding

Hello Roro First of all, please know that I am not a professional linguist. I learned the term "ergative verb" only a couple of years ago from a scholar on an English learners' forum for Japanese. So my knowledge is much more limited than yours.

Hello Viognier First of all, please understand I am not a linguistic expert. So I have no intention to contest with you about this kind of professional subject. As you also know, there are many opinions about the concept of "tense" among

Hi paco. I would be pleased to explain to you what I wrote. It is entirely based on Mel'čuk (+Bybee et all 1994)'s theory, though. I find it rather complicated, so can I ask you some question about your view first? You wrote: