I think I hear 'Sunday' there.You must ...on Sunday.(maybe) Hmm, it might be "Sunday", yes. Here comes a BIG problem that I've been wondering about for ages... And I'd like to find out more on this phenomenon soon.The

hello, my name is Paweł. I would like to know if it is possible to say Anglia instead England?

Since it's a public announcement, use weren't . It's classier. Actually everyday usage is mixed on this. Both was are were are used, but was is considered a bit "low-class" by some. English teachers usually insist on were . CJ

1.A history of the English language 2.The history of the English language There's really no difference between the two. It's just a matter of what the author wants for his title. To the extent that there is any difference I guess you

how can ı improve my english?can you help me?

I definitely do not hear "trumps" -- I hear "charms". But I still here otherwise ,trumps. To me, the speaker sounds like he might not be a native speaker of English -- which might explain the mispronunciation of

Can you explain the meaning of would in the statement below? I would say that your grammar book, Cambridge Dictionaries and the British Library are all correct The biggest mistake that learners make about the word would is that it has a meaning

Can someone or english teachers check my essay for me?

A child never comes into this world thinking that their parents will end up in divorce and become raised by a single parent. In some cases the grandparents give a helping hand just to make it easier on the mother. Growing up without a dad is

Hello! Please, could you explain me what is the difference between those two: 1.A history of English language 2.The history of English language For me it seems natural that the definite article should be used in this case, but I have