Hello, I have this doubt, which I cannot solve alone. Sorry. Which one is correct? a) There is the best restaurant. (I think this one is correct.) b) There it is the best restaurant. And with the weather? a) Today is a sunny day.

It makes me contented to realise that you have made sense of the striking difference between not... but vs and , so this 'one thing' you are referring to is the last on the agenda, and may I be clear about two points. First, the omission

After talking it out with some fellow teachers and looking some terms up...we're still a little unsure about our conclusions. Any clarifications would be greatly appreciated! "I'm going to talk about Ichiro Suzuki." (Starting out

The point is that not only... but (also) , unlike and , is not limited to additive function; it distinguishes rather than equates the coordinated elements, so the interpretation 'a matter of X and Y' is dismissed at once, don't worry

I'm not sure of your meaning. The first statement could be exclamatory, and the second "explanatory." Or it could all be one sentence, with the second clause explaining "how much." According to my AmHtg dictionary, the

Hi, First, please tell us if you know the difference between an adjective, an adverb and a noun. CliveD

1 Could you tell me who the best driver in the city is? 2 Who do you think the best person to ask about cars is? Isn't it exactly like sentence 4) ? No. Not exactly. The structures are different. who is in an indirect question in 1. who is in

should has several uses. I assume you are referring only to the usage of 'advisory' should , which is the only one which is close to had better in meaning. ___________ had better can be used in situations of implied threat, and should is

I would like to know which is correct. A:Many teens love to ride roller coasters, which they think are exciting. The roller coasters are exciting. B:Many teens love to ride roller coasters, which they think is exciting. The action of riding the

Normal 0 false false false RU X-NONE X-NONE MicrosoftInternetExplorer4 Hello, Raja, It goes without saying that there is no blame in being a non-native speaker and a layperson in linguistic science, so