The first is simply ungrammatical, unless you want to say that the new hero introduces something else. When a new monster is created, a new hero introduces a new weapon with which to slay it. If you simply want to say a new hero is

Thank you for the reply! It was on purpose to do it without parallelism, although I couldn't see w/out the 'is' ppl might take the meaning differently. i would be more appreciative if anyone can point out more specificly how should the statement

You need parallelism between the constructions, thus is. >When a new monster created Bad English. It's like the monster created something ... Don't invent things. Read the good literature and apply the patterns there.

'When a new monster is created, a new hero introduced'. I'm struggling between 'hero introduced' or 'hero is introduced', please state why as well. And how is it different if "When a new monster created, a new hero is introduced"? TY in

hi everyone can u tell me if there is any free grammar check program? thank u all

If that is the answer you want to give, then I would suggest a slight rewording: Besides the sound of the harness bells, only the sounds of “easy wind and downy flake” can be heard where the poet is standing.

But are there any grammar mistakes in my answer? Besides the sound of shaking of the harness bells, the sounds “of easy wind and downy flake” alone can be heard where the poet is standing. I am confused with the insertion of "alone". Is

The words "easy wind and downy flake" mean "a gentle wind and (falling) snow" -- both of which are things that you probably would not be able to hear. So, a better answer to your question might be that the poet doesn't hear anything except the

Apart from the sound of shaking of the harness bells , the sounds of easy wind and downy flake which are only possible to be heard alone, can be heard where the poet is standing. If you write in this form you will avoid using paranthesis.

Could someone please tell me if there are any grammar mistakes in the answer below. I have put parentheses where I doubt. What other sounds alone can be heard where the poet is standing? Besides the sound of shaking of the harness bells, the