She is eating dinner for one hour. / She has been eating dinner for one hour. He is watching TV all day. / He has been watching TV all day. It is raining outside. / It has been raining outside. What are you talking about? / What have

I'm not questioning about 'Present Perfect VS Present Perfect Progressive'. Please, let me know the difference of 'Present Progressive and Present Perfect Progressive'. For example, She is eating dinner for one hour. /

Will both the processes in 1 and 3 end by next week and by the end of the year? If they do, why not use future perfect tense? If they don't, why not use future perfect progressive? Please advise, thanks.

Ben, This is how I would explain it.. <<use passive voice " ...to have been operating abnormally " <<< . " ...To have been operating abnormally " is not passive voice but present perfect progressive. It will

when it comes to day to day conversation, none of that really matters anymore .. how we express ourselves decides what people see from us. what do you think?

the difference is have been.

I agree with Seraphin. Also, if you want to use a perfect tense to say the same, use Perfect Progressive: "What had you been doing before you came here?"

Verb Tense ... will have been going ... Future Perfect Progressive ( will, have, be -ing ) CJ

WesternAmerican wrote: Thank you very much, Thai. That was my friend asking those questions on my behalf. In regard to your '' I am full, I have been eating 2 bowls of rice'' -- You used the Present Perfect Progressive for that clause,

WesternAmerican wrote: Thank you very much, Thai. That was my friend asking those questions on my behalf. In regard to your '' I am full, I have been eating 2 bowls of rice'' -- You used the Present Perfect Progressive for that clause, claiming