<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" ?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="http://www.englishforums.com/utility/FeedStylesheets/rss.xsl" media="screen"?><rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/" xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"><channel><title>Search results for 'tag:Adjectives' matching tag 'Adjectives'</title><link>http://www.englishforums.com/search/pro.htm?q=tag%3aAdjectives</link><description>Search results for 'tag:Adjectives' matching tag 'Adjectives'</description><dc:language>en-US</dc:language><generator>XMOD (Build: 3616.28671)</generator><item><title>Re: The word replete</title><link>http://www.englishforums.com/English/TheWordReplete/lqvzj/post.htm#998596</link><pubDate>Wed, 25 Nov 2009 11:27:00 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="true">946f00bb-57d3-4b7b-a9a2-059b5341af52:998596</guid><dc:creator>ivanhr</dc:creator><description>No, not normally. But I&amp;#39;ve seen the word used in a post noun position. 
 
 Example 
 By the doo doo room with the reek replete. (from a Frank Zappa&amp;#39;s song) 
  
 When the word is used in this way it is similar to the adjective galore. 
 I think you wouldn&amp;#39;t use it like this in formal speech.</description></item><item><title>Re: Go missing</title><link>http://www.englishforums.com/English/GoMissing/lqbxq/post.htm#998347</link><pubDate>Tue, 24 Nov 2009 20:27:27 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="true">946f00bb-57d3-4b7b-a9a2-059b5341af52:998347</guid><dc:creator>califjim</dc:creator><description>Or maybe someone can pick my argument apart Not gonna happen! It&amp;#39;s too obvious that missing is an adjective.   He&amp;#39;s missing. She&amp;#39;s been missing for a week.  It&amp;#39;s missing. What&amp;#39;s missing? Is anything missing?    CJ</description></item><item><title>Re: Go missing</title><link>http://www.englishforums.com/English/GoMissing/lqbxq/post.htm#998318</link><pubDate>Tue, 24 Nov 2009 19:52:31 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="true">946f00bb-57d3-4b7b-a9a2-059b5341af52:998318</guid><dc:creator>mrpernickety</dc:creator><description>But what part of speech is &amp;quot;missing&amp;quot; there?     Consider these samples: My heart went cold The phone went dead The tyre went flat   They all bear an unmistakable resemblance to &amp;quot;went missing&amp;quot;, and seeing as &amp;quot;cold/dead/flat&amp;quot; are all adjectives, it is safe to assume that &amp;quot;missing&amp;quot; is an ajective too. Or maybe someone can pick my argument apart</description></item><item><title>Re: Go missing</title><link>http://www.englishforums.com/English/GoMissing/lqbxq/post.htm#998203</link><pubDate>Tue, 24 Nov 2009 17:36:06 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="true">946f00bb-57d3-4b7b-a9a2-059b5341af52:998203</guid><dc:creator>dimsumexpress</dc:creator><description>For what it&amp;#39;s worth, this is my take. 
 To these semi-native ears, I think not. 
 Everyone was looking for him . Here, it&amp;#39;s correct because it&amp;#39;s used with a subordinate conjunction; &amp;quot;after&amp;quot;. 
 &amp;quot;He went missing&amp;quot; - standing alone, it is an incomplete thought. 
 If you want to express that someone has disappeared and he is nowhere to be found, you can say &amp;quot;he is missing&amp;quot; to describe his immediate &amp;quot;MISSING&amp;quot; status. To me &amp;quot;missing&amp;quot; is an adjective, not a verb. 
  
 I am missing my keys. &amp;quot;Missing&amp;quot; is a verb in this sentence. 
  
 He &amp;quot;has gone missing&amp;quot; will suggest that the disappearance has taken place for sometime.</description></item><item><title>Re: Usage of "enter into it"</title><link>http://www.englishforums.com/English/UsageOfEnterIntoIt/2/lpwbb/Post.htm#997268</link><pubDate>Mon, 23 Nov 2009 19:28:00 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="true">946f00bb-57d3-4b7b-a9a2-059b5341af52:997268</guid><dc:creator>avangi</dc:creator><description>It may seem like we have a team of dead horses here.   We can apply a lot of virtuous adjectives to the process of preparing for an exam.  You must be diligent / persevering / thorough in preparing for the exam.  (Perhaps you&amp;#39;re normally a lazy, careless person.)   The important distinction is that &amp;quot;X to prepare&amp;quot; describes the kind of person you ARE  before the preparation.  You must be sober to prepare for the exam.   &amp;quot;X in preparing&amp;quot; describes the WAY you handle yourself during the preparation. You must be careful in preparing for the exam.   Damn the prepositions, anyway! If you say, &amp;quot;You must be careful to prepare for the exam,&amp;quot; that means. &amp;quot;Make sure you  do  it!&amp;quot;</description></item><item><title>Re: Run-on adjectives</title><link>http://www.englishforums.com/English/RunOnAdjectives/lppgm/post.htm#996947</link><pubDate>Mon, 23 Nov 2009 13:09:11 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="true">946f00bb-57d3-4b7b-a9a2-059b5341af52:996947</guid><dc:creator>mister micawber</dc:creator><description>Hello, Darcy- and welcome to English Forums. Your sentence needs a bit of rearrangement:    They are light, mottled grey overall, and they have a pink bill.    (By the way, what are we speaking of here, immature albatrosses?)</description></item><item><title>Run-on adjectives</title><link>http://www.englishforums.com/English/RunOnAdjectives/lppgm/post.htm</link><pubDate>Mon, 23 Nov 2009 11:19:40 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="true">946f00bb-57d3-4b7b-a9a2-059b5341af52:996875</guid><dc:creator>d ogada</dc:creator><description>does this sentence need a comma or more? 
  
 They are overall mottled light grey with a pink bill. 
  
 thanks, Darcy</description></item><item><title>Re: Use of that as adverb</title><link>http://www.englishforums.com/English/UseOfThatAsAdverb/lpnzm/post.htm#996629</link><pubDate>Mon, 23 Nov 2009 05:56:35 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="true">946f00bb-57d3-4b7b-a9a2-059b5341af52:996629</guid><dc:creator>yankee</dc:creator><description>I remember the day that he came.
  We aren’t going for the simple reason that we can’t afford it.  Why do you think &amp;quot;that&amp;quot; might be an adverb in those two sentences, Debpriya De?   The word &amp;quot;that&amp;quot; is very often used as a relative pronoun, and that is what it is in your sentences. It refers back to a noun and introduces a relative clause. The word &amp;quot;that&amp;quot; refers to &amp;quot;day&amp;quot; in your first sentence, and to the word &amp;quot;reason&amp;quot; in your second sentence.   Using &amp;quot;that&amp;quot; as an adverb is a very limited/specialized sort of usage. Look again at the examples I posted earlier. In my sentences, the word &amp;quot;that&amp;quot; modifies the adjective or adverb that comes after it and the meaning is similar...</description></item><item><title>Re: Noun, Adjective, and Adverb</title><link>http://www.englishforums.com/English/NounAdjectiveAndAdverb/llzwx/post.htm#996508</link><pubDate>Mon, 23 Nov 2009 02:48:46 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="true">946f00bb-57d3-4b7b-a9a2-059b5341af52:996508</guid><dc:creator>buckmajor</dc:creator><description>I&amp;#39;m quite surprise that no one has replied yet?? I thought V.I.P members always get first priority haha lol na kidding.</description></item><item><title>Re: Use of that as adverb</title><link>http://www.englishforums.com/English/UseOfThatAsAdverb/lpnzm/post.htm#996378</link><pubDate>Sun, 22 Nov 2009 23:21:31 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="true">946f00bb-57d3-4b7b-a9a2-059b5341af52:996378</guid><dc:creator>yankee</dc:creator><description>It&amp;#39;s not that hard to explain.    The word &amp;quot;that&amp;quot; can modify an adjective or another adverb (often in combination with the word &amp;quot;all&amp;quot;). It&amp;#39;s also usually found in negative sentences. Here are some additional examples:   - Don&amp;#39;t bother trying to get to know her. She&amp;#39;s not (all) that friendly. - He&amp;#39;s been raving about her homemade soup for days, but I didn&amp;#39;t think it tasted (all) that good.  - Why are you so late? We only got dusting of snow, so the roads couldn&amp;#39;t have been (all) that bad. - Why are you using crutches? Your toe can&amp;#39;t possibly hurt (all) that badly! - I think she looks pretty much the same, so I guess her nose job didn&amp;#39;t change things (all) that radically.</description></item><item><title>Re: The history of packaging (CPE, Selective cloze)</title><link>http://www.englishforums.com/English/TheHistoryPackagingSelectiveCloze/lwdlr/post.htm#996021</link><pubDate>Sun, 22 Nov 2009 14:58:02 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="true">946f00bb-57d3-4b7b-a9a2-059b5341af52:996021</guid><dc:creator>tanit</dc:creator><description>How do you compose these gaps, do you use a special program?     Hi. I tried to find the post where Hitchhiker explained how to post tests, but I didn&amp;#39;t make it. However, the code is quite simple.   Enclose the text within the tags    and    (without the spaces. I put them to prevent the sytem from converting the whole post into a test!) Also, enclose the given choices within inverted commas/speechmarks ( &amp;quot; ), put the correct one first and separate them by means of this symbol  |  (no spaces).  For instance:        The is  &amp;quot; an article  |  a verb  |  a noun  |  an adj</description></item><item><title>Re: Sentence analysis</title><link>http://www.englishforums.com/English/SentenceAnalysis/lpkrm/post.htm#996004</link><pubDate>Sun, 22 Nov 2009 14:43:23 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="true">946f00bb-57d3-4b7b-a9a2-059b5341af52:996004</guid><dc:creator>gleb_chebrikoff</dc:creator><description>Greetings, Tina,   Mister Micawber&amp;#39;s answers are completely relevant, but let me make some additional remarks:   1. A time of prosperity and peace - is a noun phrase you analysed absolutely correctly. In general, noun phrases may have the following constituent parts: a) the  head , around which the other constituents cluster. In your case, it is time ;   b) the  determinative , which includes   -  predeterminers , all items which precede any central determiner in a noun phrase, eg  all,  both, half (there are no predeterminers in your case);   -  central determiners , such as articles, this/that, some, etc. In your example, a is a central determiner;   -  postdeterminers , follow central determiners but precede premodifiers...</description></item><item><title>Re: Well-known vs. known</title><link>http://www.englishforums.com/English/WellKnownVsKnown/lpjjq/post.htm#995310</link><pubDate>Sat, 21 Nov 2009 21:43:35 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="true">946f00bb-57d3-4b7b-a9a2-059b5341af52:995310</guid><dc:creator>philip</dc:creator><description>It is correct. It is very common to see this modified adjective before the noun as follows: 
 It is a very well-known theory that....</description></item><item><title>Re: Close</title><link>http://www.englishforums.com/English/Close/lpwvk/post.htm#994883</link><pubDate>Sat, 21 Nov 2009 12:34:26 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="true">946f00bb-57d3-4b7b-a9a2-059b5341af52:994883</guid><dc:creator>gleb_chebrikoff</dc:creator><description>Dear friend,   close is most frequently used as an adjective or a verb, but in can also be an adverb meaning &amp;#39;closely, tightly; near, in proximity + close to the wind (an idiom)&amp;#39;. Context is crucial in classifying close as an adjective or an adverb, you are right.   Respectfully, Gleb Chebrikoff</description></item><item><title>Re: All I need is…</title><link>http://www.englishforums.com/English/AllINeedIs/lpzkl/post.htm#994292</link><pubDate>Fri, 20 Nov 2009 21:58:06 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="true">946f00bb-57d3-4b7b-a9a2-059b5341af52:994292</guid><dc:creator>califjim</dc:creator><description>it is still not clear to me. OK. Maybe you just need a little review about &amp;quot;dummy it &amp;quot;.    In many cases, as with adjectives like important, possible, and necessary , we move the subject from the beginning to the end of the sentence, putting it in its place at the beginning. The it that you see at the beginning is called &amp;quot;dummy it &amp;quot;, because it is just a place holder for the subject that has been moved to the end. Remember, a subject has to be a noun or something noun-like, for example, a noun clause. The for ... to ... clause is not adverbial.      is necessary.  becomes   is necessary .      is not possible.  becomes   is not possible .  _____________________________________   The following example is more like your...</description></item><item><title>Re: Confusion about adjectives.</title><link>http://www.englishforums.com/English/ConfusionAboutAdjectives/lpzvm/post.htm#993954</link><pubDate>Fri, 20 Nov 2009 15:05:31 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="true">946f00bb-57d3-4b7b-a9a2-059b5341af52:993954</guid><dc:creator>avangi</dc:creator><description>These are adjectives, alright.   The trick is that &amp;quot;verbs of sense&amp;quot; work like verbs of being, in taking an adjective complement.   &amp;quot;You smell sweet, but I am sweet!&amp;quot;</description></item><item><title>Confusion about adjectives.</title><link>http://www.englishforums.com/English/ConfusionAboutAdjectives/lpzvm/post.htm</link><pubDate>Fri, 20 Nov 2009 15:00:24 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="true">946f00bb-57d3-4b7b-a9a2-059b5341af52:993951</guid><dc:creator>vini.ch</dc:creator><description>I feel awful. 
 The flowers in the garden smell sweet. 
 Please tell me which part of speech is awful and sweet. 
  
 Thanx!</description></item><item><title>Re: Having respect for and devotion to the natural world</title><link>http://www.englishforums.com/English/HavingRespectDevotionNatural-World/lpbln/post.htm#992956</link><pubDate>Thu, 19 Nov 2009 15:33:24 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="true">946f00bb-57d3-4b7b-a9a2-059b5341af52:992956</guid><dc:creator>avangi</dc:creator><description>No. Each adjective takes its own (different) preposition.   When you switch to the verbals, you have new problems. They don&amp;#39;t work in parallel.   You have respect for X.   You can devote the next four hours to homework. You can devote yourself to improving. You can be devoted to improving. (You can  respect  the world, but you can&amp;#39;t  devote  the world.)   &amp;quot;It&amp;quot; refers to the entire bolded participial phrase.   I don&amp;#39;t understand where you want to put the &amp;quot;they.&amp;quot; The simple subject is &amp;quot;having,&amp;quot; which is singular. You might suspect the verb &amp;quot;need&amp;quot; is plural, but it&amp;#39;s actually subjunctive singular.  &amp;quot;Money and power  are   intoxicating.&amp;quot; (compound subject, plural verb) ...</description></item><item><title>Re: Two Inquiries: Intransitive vs. Transitive problem? and Relative Pronoun positions.</title><link>http://www.englishforums.com/English/TwoInquiriesIntransitiveTransitive-ProblemRelativePronounPos/lxkrh/post.htm#992303</link><pubDate>Thu, 19 Nov 2009 02:37:58 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="true">946f00bb-57d3-4b7b-a9a2-059b5341af52:992303</guid><dc:creator>gleb_chebrikoff</dc:creator><description>Hello, Chris,   this clause would be an adjective clause , right?   in fact, one should distinguish between relative clauses and adjective clauses , which are more precisely termed supplementive adjective clauses and represent only a special case of verbless clauses , as in   The man, quietly assertive , spoke to the assembled workers.   I wouldn&amp;#39;t fault your explanation of the placing of the relative clause, though I suppose that it rests upon the unconsciously existing presupposition about what is &amp;#39;given&amp;#39; and what is &amp;#39;new&amp;#39;. By way of pure hypothesis, we can make up the following dialogue unfolding between two neighbours in a fictitious neighbourhood teeming with celebrities:   - Who is the lady over there?  - The...</description></item><item><title>Re: Two Inquiries: Intransitive vs. Transitive problem? and Relative Pronoun positions.</title><link>http://www.englishforums.com/English/TwoInquiriesIntransitiveTransitive-ProblemRelativePronounPos/lxkrh/post.htm#992258</link><pubDate>Thu, 19 Nov 2009 01:30:59 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="true">946f00bb-57d3-4b7b-a9a2-059b5341af52:992258</guid><dc:creator>minofachino</dc:creator><description>Gleb Chebrikoff, thank you for your response. It&amp;#39;s really informative and interesting--I agree with your analysis of &amp;quot;tell.&amp;quot;     3. (d; intr., tr.) (&amp;#39;to inform&amp;#39;) to — about, of (he didn&amp;#39;t want to — about the incident; — me about the game; she told everyone of her success)   The definition from your combinatory dictionary works, but it still has that controversial element because switching in &amp;quot;to inform&amp;quot; (I&amp;#39;m going to inform about Ichiro Suzki) doesn&amp;#39;t sound...well, sound--it&amp;#39;s similar to the issues of substituting &amp;quot;to notify.&amp;quot;   Additionally, I feel like &amp;quot;tell&amp;quot; brings with it a sense of urgency, importance, mystery, sternness (when used to discipline) or secrecy, which...</description></item><item><title>Re: Coordinate or non-coordinate adjectives?</title><link>http://www.englishforums.com/English/CoordinateCoordinateAdjectives/llrkv/post.htm#991125</link><pubDate>Wed, 18 Nov 2009 00:59:49 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="true">946f00bb-57d3-4b7b-a9a2-059b5341af52:991125</guid><dc:creator>doctor d</dc:creator><description>Use commas when the adjectives are of equal weight (modify the noun equally). If you can simply reverse the order of the adjectives, then you probably need a comma   In the first phrase, I think &amp;quot;small&amp;quot; modifies &amp;quot;circular&amp;quot; more than it does &amp;quot;piece of metal,&amp;quot; so I would not include a comma. The phrase &amp;quot;a circular small piece of metal&amp;quot; sounds wrong.    In the case of the adjectives modifying &amp;quot;piece of cloth,&amp;quot; they are of equal weigh and their order can be shifted (&amp;quot;a white, soft piece of cloth&amp;quot;), so the comma should be included.</description></item><item><title>Re: Coupled with the dismal</title><link>http://www.englishforums.com/English/CoupledWithTheDismal/lxlgk/post.htm#990995</link><pubDate>Tue, 17 Nov 2009 22:01:54 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="true">946f00bb-57d3-4b7b-a9a2-059b5341af52:990995</guid><dc:creator>clive</dc:creator><description>Hi 
 
   
  &amp;#39;dismal&amp;#39; is an adjective that here means &amp;#39;feeble, disappointing&amp;#39;. 
  &amp;#39;the dismal showing of the Sena&amp;#39; means &amp;#39;the feeble, disappointing election results of the Sena&amp;#39;. 
  coupled with means &amp;#39;and/together with&amp;#39;.  
  
  ( The strong results drawn by Thackeray in the Lok Sabha and Assembly polls )  coupled with  (the dismal showing of the Sena )  have fuelled fears of Sena leaders and grassroots workers deserting the party for the MNS 
   
 Clive</description></item><item><title>Re: TERMINOLOGY</title><link>http://www.englishforums.com/English/Terminology/lxkmp/post.htm#990642</link><pubDate>Tue, 17 Nov 2009 14:50:44 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="true">946f00bb-57d3-4b7b-a9a2-059b5341af52:990642</guid><dc:creator>mister micawber</dc:creator><description>The words below are wrong ('proper noun' is the wrong term-- proper nouns are nouns like 'Paris', 'Japan' and 'George'; the 'proper nouns' below are ' common nouns '):     phone - (proper noun )  boiling - (adjective)   
  pot - (proper noun) spaghetti - (proper noun)  
     
  scent -  (   )   smoke - (  )   
  sweat - (  ) casino - (proper noun) are - (   )   
 &lt;span style="color:</description></item><item><title>TERMINOLOGY</title><link>http://www.englishforums.com/English/Terminology/lxkmp/post.htm</link><pubDate>Tue, 17 Nov 2009 14:38:46 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="true">946f00bb-57d3-4b7b-a9a2-059b5341af52:990622</guid><dc:creator>yaggy74</dc:creator><description>Could someone please check I have the right terminology for these words I will list first the terminology I have to use, then I will write the words and the terminology I think it is in red next to each word. Most of them are simple enough but there are one or two I am struggling with. I have 4 short sentences below. Many thanks for your help and assistance it is much appreciated. 
  
 1. Adjectives 
 2. Adverbs 
 3. Auxiliary verbs 
 4. Cardinal numbers 
 5. Conjunctions 
 6. Definate article 
 7. Indefinate article 
 8. Main verbs 
 9. Concrete nouns 
 10. Prepositions 
 11. Pronouns 
 12. Proper nouns 
  
 When - (conjunction) the - (definate article) phone - (proper noun ) rang, - (main verb)   
  I - (pronoun) was -...</description></item><item><title>Re: Sending shooting pains</title><link>http://www.englishforums.com/English/SendingShootingPains/lxkwp/post.htm#990587</link><pubDate>Tue, 17 Nov 2009 14:11:56 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="true">946f00bb-57d3-4b7b-a9a2-059b5341af52:990587</guid><dc:creator>mister micawber</dc:creator><description>1. in this phrase, what does "shooting" mean?-- quickly and intermittently occurring  2. is "shooting" the adjective here?- Yes  3. can i also say: "shooting pains through my back" (with shooting used as verb)?-- No.  'The pains are shooting....'  4. is "sending pains through my back" also correct?- - No.</description></item><item><title>Sending shooting pains</title><link>http://www.englishforums.com/English/SendingShootingPains/lxkwp/post.htm</link><pubDate>Tue, 17 Nov 2009 13:39:05 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="true">946f00bb-57d3-4b7b-a9a2-059b5341af52:990554</guid><dc:creator>chiageraldine</dc:creator><description>&amp;quot;Sending shooting pains&amp;quot;    1. in this phrase, what does &amp;quot;shooting&amp;quot; mean?   2. is &amp;quot;shooting&amp;quot; the adjective here?   3. can i also say: &amp;quot;shooting pains through my back&amp;quot; (with shooting used as verb)?   4. is &amp;quot;sending pains through my back&amp;quot; also correct?    please help me withe the 4 questions.. thank you so much</description></item><item><title>Re: Adverb "below"</title><link>http://www.englishforums.com/English/AdverbBelow/lnjhz/post.htm#990523</link><pubDate>Tue, 17 Nov 2009 12:54:57 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="true">946f00bb-57d3-4b7b-a9a2-059b5341af52:990523</guid><dc:creator>mister micawber</dc:creator><description>It is a post-modifying adjective of the noun 'address/problem'.</description></item><item><title>Re: Close</title><link>http://www.englishforums.com/English/Close/lxcvd/post.htm#989630</link><pubDate>Tue, 17 Nov 2009 09:37:42 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="true">946f00bb-57d3-4b7b-a9a2-059b5341af52:989630</guid><dc:creator>gleb_chebrikoff</dc:creator><description>Pleasehelp,   some words may have a single form, which, however, corresponds to several parts of speech. In this light, open can be an adjective ( an open window ), a verb ( open the window ), or a noun ( life in the open ). Such words are called homomorphs.    If you are interested in the details of &amp;#39; open vs clos ed &amp;#39;&amp;#39; relationship, I wish to tell you that open as adjective existed even in Old English (and was written the same way as nowadays), but close was gradually changed to closed , reflecting the need to distinguish it from close meaning &amp;#39; only a short distance away or apart in space or time &amp;#39;, as in The hotel is close to the sea .   Respectfully, Gleb Chebrikoff</description></item><item><title>Re: Discipline</title><link>http://www.englishforums.com/English/Discipline/llrzl/post.htm#985019</link><pubDate>Tue, 17 Nov 2009 00:10:38 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="true">946f00bb-57d3-4b7b-a9a2-059b5341af52:985019</guid><dc:creator>uktous</dc:creator><description>hi,   In my reply, I want to say 2 things.   1: I misunderstand that MSc and BSc are adjective only. I don&amp;#39;t know they can be nouns. thanks   2: someone told me that  &amp;quot;I have a BSc and an  MSc degrees in economics&amp;quot;  &amp;quot;I have ( 2 things here, so need plural ) degrees in economics&amp;quot;  but the person may not be correct</description></item><item><title>Re: Clauses [&amp;&amp;] what not.!</title><link>http://www.englishforums.com/English/ClausesWhatNot/lnwvx/post.htm#984996</link><pubDate>Mon, 16 Nov 2009 23:42:26 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="true">946f00bb-57d3-4b7b-a9a2-059b5341af52:984996</guid><dc:creator>clive</dc:creator><description>Hi, 
 First, please tell us if you know the difference between an adjective, an adverb and a noun. 
  
 CliveD</description></item><item><title>Re: Grammar problems. Thanks.</title><link>http://www.englishforums.com/English/GrammarProblemsThanks/lnwvv/post.htm#984995</link><pubDate>Mon, 16 Nov 2009 23:40:48 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="true">946f00bb-57d3-4b7b-a9a2-059b5341af52:984995</guid><dc:creator>clive</dc:creator><description>Hi, 
 1. I walk and I do walking.  What is the difference between these two? 
 The latter is not very idiomatic. It sounds a bit like you are taling about your hobbies. 
  
 2.  Drink milk before you go to sleep.  and  Drinking milk before sleeping .  Which one is correct? 
 The former is a sentence, because &amp;#39;drink&amp;#39; is an imperative verb form. 
 The latter is merely a phrase, with no main verb. &amp;#39;Drinking/sleeling&amp;#39; are gerunds. 
  
 3. Industry zone or Industrial zone / Resident zone  or Residential zone. 
  Do I need to use Adj or Noun before zone ? 
 The idiomatic thing is to use an adjective.  
  
 4. Keep me informed if you receive the new message .  
 &amp;quot;if&amp;quot; here is correct ? Yes.  It expresses a...</description></item><item><title>Re: Could you please take a look at these sentences that are driving me insane</title><link>http://www.englishforums.com/English/CouldLookTheseSentencesDriving-Insane/lkwmx/post.htm#984889</link><pubDate>Mon, 16 Nov 2009 20:54:45 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="true">946f00bb-57d3-4b7b-a9a2-059b5341af52:984889</guid><dc:creator>doctor d</dc:creator><description>Here are my preferences:  1 In what/ which episode does she get murdered? 2 What is a crow the sy m bol of? (can you end with a preposition?) &amp;lt;You can, but better to avoid. &amp;quot;The crow is a symbol of what?&amp;quot;&amp;gt; 3 I sold it for the price I bought it for /at. &amp;lt;for. Or say, &amp;quot;I sold it for the price I paid for it.&amp;quot;&amp;gt; 4 After retail stores, the internet is the second biggest place where people shop during the holidays. &amp;lt;&amp;quot;After&amp;quot; implies &amp;quot;second,&amp;quot; so &amp;quot;second&amp;quot; is not needed.&amp;gt; 5 I forgot what the last thingt I wrote was. &amp;lt;Okay, but spellcheck: thing .&amp;gt; 6 Detonate a bomb from a distance /at a distance ./ I could open her parachute from a distance. There is a camera in the...</description></item><item><title>Noun, Adjective, and Adverb</title><link>http://www.englishforums.com/English/NounAdjectiveAndAdverb/llzwx/post.htm</link><pubDate>Mon, 16 Nov 2009 13:58:11 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="true">946f00bb-57d3-4b7b-a9a2-059b5341af52:974369</guid><dc:creator>buckmajor</dc:creator><description>Hi ESL   I was looking up the word &amp;#39;affirm&amp;#39; in a dictionary, and couldn&amp;#39;t help but to know how to use the related forms for any type of word e.g. noun, adjective, adverb, etc.   Example: -- 
 af⋅firm⋅a⋅ble,  adjective  
 
 af⋅firm⋅a⋅bly,  adverb  
 
 af⋅firm⋅er,  noun  
 
 af⋅firm⋅ing⋅ly,  adverb 
 --   The above example is for the word &amp;#39;affirm&amp;#39;. Because there are 2 adverbs ( af⋅firm⋅ing⋅ly and  af⋅firm⋅a⋅bly)  in the example, so can either of those adverb&amp;#39;s be used in a sentence, or do one have its own meaning than the other? If so, how would you write a sentence for the 2 adverbs?   How do I know when to use the Noun, Adjective, and Adverb in a sentence? Although I know what it means (I hope) , sometimes...</description></item><item><title>Re: Grammar</title><link>http://www.englishforums.com/English/Grammar/lkxpm/post.htm#972358</link><pubDate>Sun, 15 Nov 2009 17:06:14 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="true">946f00bb-57d3-4b7b-a9a2-059b5341af52:972358</guid><dc:creator>gleb_chebrikoff</dc:creator><description>Dear friends, just a follow-up. Some critics still maintain that due to can only be used as an adjective, and not as a preposition; thus, in their view, a sentence like  The game was postponed due to rain  is ungrammatical and should be reworded in the following way:  The game was postponed because of rain.  or  The game&amp;#39;s postponement was due to rain.  Respectfully, Gleb Chebrikoff</description></item><item><title>Re: Passivisation</title><link>http://www.englishforums.com/English/Passivisation/lkxxw/post.htm#972241</link><pubDate>Sun, 15 Nov 2009 14:30:03 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="true">946f00bb-57d3-4b7b-a9a2-059b5341af52:972241</guid><dc:creator>gleb_chebrikoff</dc:creator><description>Dear friend, the first set of examples is quite correct grammatically, no doubt, representing the pattern verb + object + to-infinitive complementation . In this case, passivization is possible, though some constraints still apply even to this pattern.  However, we may not perform the same operation with the second pair of sentences, since they should feature an entirely different pattern, namely, verb + object + adjective phrase as object complement. Hence the sentence * They prefer John swimming is ungrammatical, as prefer cannot be used with the pattern verb + object + -ing participle comlementation , unlike, eg, hear  We could hear the rain splashing on the roof.  In other words, you could use the following with prefer :  The prefer...</description></item><item><title>Re: Passive &amp; Active Voice</title><link>http://www.englishforums.com/English/PassiveActiveVoice/lkmkk/post.htm#971524</link><pubDate>Sat, 14 Nov 2009 19:29:57 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="true">946f00bb-57d3-4b7b-a9a2-059b5341af52:971524</guid><dc:creator>tanit</dc:creator><description>Hi, I&amp;#39;d change these:  5. The sun was eclipsed by the moon.  ACTIVE  PASSIVE  9. This bone has been  buried  by the dog . PASSIVE  10. It takes a long time to think of these examples . PASSIVE  ACTIVE  13. There was a cup of coffee on the table but now  it&amp;#39;s  gone. ACTIVE  15. Mark was given one month to write this book . ACTIVE  PASSIVE  As far as your #14 is concerned, I am not sure everybody would agree on this.   14. I was born under a wandering star  I was taught that this is technically a passive form, but some regard it as active (Cambridge dictionary lists the verb &amp;quot; be born &amp;quot;). For instance, here&amp;#39;s what some of our most prominent members wrote in the forums. (Opinions are split)  Clive ( from this post&lt;</description></item><item><title>Re: Position of ONLY</title><link>http://www.englishforums.com/English/PositionOfOnly/lklxn/post.htm#971371</link><pubDate>Sat, 14 Nov 2009 15:45:55 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="true">946f00bb-57d3-4b7b-a9a2-059b5341af52:971371</guid><dc:creator>philip</dc:creator><description>Hi Dipsik 
  
  
 Either one is OK. If you place &amp;quot;only&amp;quot; directly in front of &amp;quot;an infinitesimal chance&amp;quot;, then you would be focusing the idea of &amp;quot;only&amp;quot; directly on &amp;quot;an infinitesimal chance&amp;quot;. 
 
 And that&amp;#39;s exactly what I always try to do: put the &amp;#39;only&amp;#39; as near as possible to what is being modified by it, just as with any adjective.</description></item><item><title>Re: Two questions about tense</title><link>http://www.englishforums.com/English/TwoQuestionsAboutTense/lklwj/post.htm#971277</link><pubDate>Sat, 14 Nov 2009 13:56:27 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="true">946f00bb-57d3-4b7b-a9a2-059b5341af52:971277</guid><dc:creator>yankee</dc:creator><description>Hi Sitifan   For 1, I would only choose &amp;quot;was&amp;quot;. (was stolen = passive = reference to a past act)   For 2, I would use &amp;quot;is&amp;quot;. We frequently use &amp;quot;broken&amp;quot; as a predicate adjective, and in this case &amp;quot;is broken&amp;quot; refers to a current state.   Basically, we don&amp;#39;t use &amp;quot;stolen&amp;quot; as a predicate adjective.</description></item><item><title>COLLOCATIONS</title><link>http://www.englishforums.com/English/Collocations/lklnx/post.htm</link><pubDate>Sat, 14 Nov 2009 13:51:27 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="true">946f00bb-57d3-4b7b-a9a2-059b5341af52:971275</guid><dc:creator>dipsik</dc:creator><description>Hello, 
 could anyone check whether I got the adjectives right (and possibly offer a better word if necessary)? On the left, there is always a &amp;#39;definition&amp;#39; or some simple adjective and I am to find a better way of expressing these ( = right column). 
 THANKS A LOT for any help 
 L. 
  
  1. effect     
  an effect which helps = a positive/beneficial effect  
  an effect nobody expected = a surprising/startling effect   
  a very funny effect = a humorous effect  
  an effect that put things right     = a stabilizing effect  
  2. change       
  a very big change = a sea change  
 &lt;span style="COLOR:b</description></item><item><title>Re: Why do you say class is canceled</title><link>http://www.englishforums.com/English/WhyClassCanceled/lkkxl/post.htm#971013</link><pubDate>Sat, 14 Nov 2009 05:58:11 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="true">946f00bb-57d3-4b7b-a9a2-059b5341af52:971013</guid><dc:creator>califjim</dc:creator><description>is Is closed an adjective in the sentence? Yes. There are many cases where you will find &amp;quot;ed&amp;quot; at the end of a word. It does not always mean &amp;quot;past tense&amp;quot;. It could be an adjective.   Present: The glass is large. Past:    The glass was large.   Present:  The door is closed. Past:    The door was closed.   CJ</description></item><item><title>Why do you say class is canceled</title><link>http://www.englishforums.com/English/WhyClassCanceled/lkkxl/post.htm</link><pubDate>Sat, 14 Nov 2009 05:49:40 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="true">946f00bb-57d3-4b7b-a9a2-059b5341af52:971000</guid><dc:creator>youngmoney</dc:creator><description>1. Class is canceled  2. school is closed   I dont understand why you use ed in a simple present sentence. is closed an adjective in the sentence? what is the different between class was closed and class is closed.</description></item><item><title>Rules for using 'that' in a sentence.</title><link>http://www.englishforums.com/English/RulesUsingSentence/lkkwk/post.htm</link><pubDate>Sat, 14 Nov 2009 03:34:18 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="true">946f00bb-57d3-4b7b-a9a2-059b5341af52:970897</guid><dc:creator>s.p.i.</dc:creator><description>Hi there,   I tried looking up the rules for using &amp;#39;that&amp;#39; in a sentence. I understand it&amp;#39;s mainly used to combine two clauses. I don&amp;#39;t understand the specific rules though; a lot of sentences look like they&amp;#39;d work fine with &amp;#39;which&amp;#39; as well..   For example:   I&amp;#39;d buy the music which has the most features. (this sentence borders on fine, although I am sure it&amp;#39;s not really correct)        THIS LOOKS FINE TOO: I&amp;#39;d buy the music player that has the most features.       MORE IMPORTANTLY WHY NOT JUST SAY: I&amp;#39;d buy the music player with the most features.      I&amp;#39;d really appreciate it if someone could explain the rules for using &amp;#39;that&amp;#39;.   I tried looking it up on various websites, but the...</description></item><item><title>Re: Commas in years</title><link>http://www.englishforums.com/English/CommasInYears/lwgzn/post.htm#970595</link><pubDate>Fri, 13 Nov 2009 20:00:40 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="true">946f00bb-57d3-4b7b-a9a2-059b5341af52:970595</guid><dc:creator>doctor d</dc:creator><description>No, the whole date is an adjective modifying &amp;quot;issue.&amp;quot; No comma is needed.</description></item><item><title>Re: Adjectives</title><link>http://www.englishforums.com/English/Adjectives/lkwbv/post.htm#970507</link><pubDate>Fri, 13 Nov 2009 17:58:33 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="true">946f00bb-57d3-4b7b-a9a2-059b5341af52:970507</guid><dc:creator>billj</dc:creator><description>I think the original post was referring to possessives in general, not just &amp;#39;him&amp;#39;. 
 
  
  
 Trad grams called my, your, his/her/its, our, your, their  possessive adjectives . However, in many modern grammars they came to be called possessive pronouns, which strictly speaking is incorrect because they do not function as pronouns at all (they don&amp;#39;t replace nouns or noun phrases and cannot occur independently), though he is a special case because it can act as both: his bike (poss adj), this bike is his (poss. pronoun). 
  
  More recently, they&amp;#39;ve been reclassified as determiners in the noun phrase, which perhaps makes most sense of all. Personally, I like the term &amp;#39;possessive determiner&amp;#39; , which sets them...</description></item><item><title>Re: Modifying intransitive verb</title><link>http://www.englishforums.com/English/ModifyingIntransitiveVerb/lkwjm/post.htm#970496</link><pubDate>Fri, 13 Nov 2009 17:51:37 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="true">946f00bb-57d3-4b7b-a9a2-059b5341af52:970496</guid><dc:creator>yankee</dc:creator><description>You can use adjectives with linking verbs, if that&amp;#39;s what you actually want to know, Burstein.   - They are intelligent.  - He feels good. - Something smells bad. - That looks interesting.</description></item><item><title>Re: Tachycardic versus tachycardiac</title><link>http://www.englishforums.com/English/TachycardicVersusTachycardiac/lkwxd/post.htm#970444</link><pubDate>Fri, 13 Nov 2009 16:33:22 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="true">946f00bb-57d3-4b7b-a9a2-059b5341af52:970444</guid><dc:creator>clive</dc:creator><description>Hi, 
 They seem to mean the same thing. In other words, they just seem to be variations in spelling. 
 Look here. 
 http://www.medilexicon.com/medicaldictionary.php 
  
 They both seem to be adjectives. 
  
 Clive</description></item><item><title>Re: Modifying intransitive verb</title><link>http://www.englishforums.com/English/ModifyingIntransitiveVerb/lkwjm/post.htm#970368</link><pubDate>Fri, 13 Nov 2009 14:20:32 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="true">946f00bb-57d3-4b7b-a9a2-059b5341af52:970368</guid><dc:creator>clive</dc:creator><description>Hi, 
 Do you mean an adverb? 
 An adjective is a word that describes/modifies a noun, pronoun, etc. 
  
 Clive</description></item><item><title>Modifying intransitive verb</title><link>http://www.englishforums.com/English/ModifyingIntransitiveVerb/lkwjm/post.htm</link><pubDate>Fri, 13 Nov 2009 13:49:45 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="true">946f00bb-57d3-4b7b-a9a2-059b5341af52:970338</guid><dc:creator>burstein</dc:creator><description>can you use an adjective to modify an intransitive verb</description></item><item><title>Re: Adjectives</title><link>http://www.englishforums.com/English/Adjectives/lkwbv/post.htm#970229</link><pubDate>Fri, 13 Nov 2009 11:19:01 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="true">946f00bb-57d3-4b7b-a9a2-059b5341af52:970229</guid><dc:creator>cool breeze</dc:creator><description>As far as I understand, a possessive adjective is placed before a noun :  This is  his  car .   A possessive pronoun cannot have a noun after it: This car is  his .   However, in many European countries terminology is different and the term possessive adjective isn&amp;#39;t used at all and consequently his is always considered a pronoun. This grammatical terminology dates from old Latin grammar usage.   CB</description></item><item><title>Re: Kindly check this sentence</title><link>http://www.englishforums.com/English/KindlyCheckThisSentence/lkvxk/post.htm#969401</link><pubDate>Thu, 12 Nov 2009 10:37:24 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="true">946f00bb-57d3-4b7b-a9a2-059b5341af52:969401</guid><dc:creator>mister micawber</dc:creator><description>Good.   Now: what can I tell you?-- It has no real grammar, since it is just a noun phrase with its appositive. All I can say is that the adjective order is acceptable.</description></item></channel></rss>