<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" ?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/" xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"><channel><title>Search results for 'tag:Articles tag:Adverbs' matching tags 'Articles' and 'Adverbs'</title><link>http://www.englishforums.com/search/pro.htm?q=tag%3aArticles+tag%3aAdverbs&amp;tag=Articles,Adverbs&amp;orTags=0</link><description>Search results for 'tag:Articles tag:Adverbs' matching tags 'Articles' and 'Adverbs'</description><dc:language>en-US</dc:language><generator>CSMOD (Build: 3170.31378)</generator><item><title>Re: gerund or verbal noun with an article?</title><link>http://www.englishforums.com/English/GerundVerbalNounArticle/2/gmrqr/Post.htm#560354</link><pubDate>Sat, 30 Aug 2008 08:30:03 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="true">946f00bb-57d3-4b7b-a9a2-059b5341af52:560354</guid><dc:creator>Crokey</dc:creator><description>hi cb, its me again!&lt;br /&gt;how do you feel about possessives before a gerund? &amp;quot;John&amp;#39;s singing bothered me&amp;quot;. You are constantly told that the possessive should be used before a gerund(unless you are saying something weird and you wish to emphasise the subject of the gerund). However, &amp;quot;John&amp;#39;s loud singing bothered me&amp;quot;, well &amp;quot;loud&amp;quot; is an adjectival attribute modifying singing, and you will never get an adverb to fit&amp;nbsp;in there. &amp;quot;the correct speaking of the english language is important&amp;quot;, &amp;quot;correctly speaking english is important&amp;quot;. So, is it&amp;nbsp; fair to say that if you can modify the -ing form with an adjecitval attribute, then it is a verbal noun and not a gerund? &amp;quot;john&amp;#39;s singing the national anthem bothered me&amp;quot; &amp;quot;john&amp;#39;s loud singing OF the national anthem bothered me&amp;quot;, I could hardly have changed the nature of the word &amp;quot;singing&amp;quot; from a gerund in the first instance, to a verbal noun in the second, merely by adding an adjective. Furthermore, if in the first case, &amp;quot;singing&amp;quot; is indeed a verbal noun, should it written as &amp;quot;john&amp;#39;s singing of the national anthem&amp;quot; , otherwise, without the preposition &amp;quot;of&amp;quot;, singing would be taking the object &amp;quot;the national anthem&amp;quot;. &lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;have a nice day!</description></item><item><title>Basic ESL Grammar</title><link>http://www.englishforums.com/English/BasicEslGrammar/glpwh/post.htm</link><pubDate>Thu, 28 Aug 2008 09:58:19 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="true">946f00bb-57d3-4b7b-a9a2-059b5341af52:559647</guid><dc:creator>angel_tristan0409</dc:creator><description>&lt;p&gt;A word is a âpart of speechâ only when it is used in a sentence. The function the word serves in a sentence is what makes it whatever part of speech it is.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;For example, the word ârunâ can be used as more than one part of speech:â¨&lt;br /&gt;&lt;em&gt;Sammy hit a home run.&lt;/em&gt; (&lt;em&gt;run&lt;/em&gt; is a noun, direct object of &lt;em&gt;hit&lt;/em&gt;)â¨&lt;br /&gt;&lt;em&gt;You mustnât run near the swimming pool.&lt;/em&gt; (&lt;em&gt;run&lt;/em&gt; is a verb, part of the verb phrase &lt;em&gt;must (not) run&lt;/em&gt;)&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Here is a simple overview of the English parts of speech and what they do. Each part of speech is linked to an DWT article that tells more about it. &lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;&lt;a href="http://www.dailywritingtips.com/english-grammar-101-nouns/"&gt;&lt;font color="#9d0f0f"&gt;NOUN&lt;/font&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/strong&gt; - Nouns are naming words. We canât talk about anything until we have given it a name.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;&lt;a href="http://www.dailywritingtips.com/english-grammar-101-pronouns/"&gt;&lt;font color="#9d0f0f"&gt;PRONOUN&lt;/font&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/strong&gt; - A pronoun is a word that stands for a noun.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;&lt;a href="http://www.dailywritingtips.com/english-grammar-101-introduction-to-the-english-verb/"&gt;&lt;font color="#9d0f0f"&gt;VERBS&lt;/font&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/strong&gt; - The verb is the motor that runs the sentence. A verb enables us to say something about a noun. &lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;&lt;a href="http://www.dailywritingtips.com/english-grammar-101-adjectives/"&gt;&lt;font color="#9d0f0f"&gt;ADJECTIVE&lt;/font&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/strong&gt; - An adjective is a word that describes a noun.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;&lt;a href="http://www.dailywritingtips.com/english-grammar-101-adverbs/"&gt;&lt;font color="#9d0f0f"&gt;ADVERB&lt;/font&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/strong&gt; - An adverb adds meaning to a verb, an adjective, or another adverb. &lt;/p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;&lt;a href="http://www.dailywritingtips.com/english-grammar-101-prepositions/"&gt;&lt;font color="#9d0f0f"&gt;PREPOSITION&lt;/font&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/strong&gt; - a preposition is a word that comes in front of a noun or a pronoun and shows a connection be</description></item><item><title>Re: What does "essentially" modify?</title><link>http://www.englishforums.com/English/WhatDoesEssentiallyModify/gllvl/post.htm#558427</link><pubDate>Mon, 25 Aug 2008 14:11:36 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="true">946f00bb-57d3-4b7b-a9a2-059b5341af52:558427</guid><dc:creator>Avangi</dc:creator><description>&lt;BLOCKQUOTE&gt;&lt;div&gt;&lt;img src="/Themes/englishforums/images/icon-quote.gif"&gt; &lt;strong&gt;Infinik&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;div&gt; I&amp;#39;m still puzzled by essentially in (a).&amp;nbsp; (a) is quoted from TRIPS Article 27, Paragraph 3(b). If &amp;quot;essentially&amp;quot; were to modify &amp;quot;biological&amp;quot;, I still need to figure out what &amp;quot;essentially biological processes&amp;quot; means, both legally and scientifically.&lt;br /&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;br /&gt;I have another view on (a).&amp;nbsp;The word &amp;quot;essentially&amp;quot; is used because it emphasizes what is not included as non-biological processes. As you&amp;#39;ve said, it can be dropped without harm.&amp;nbsp; But, just wondering, it could have lawful meaning attached, just like &amp;quot;substantially&amp;quot;, which is a legalese in patent specs interpretation.&lt;/div&gt;&lt;/BLOCKQUOTE&gt; I understand what you want, but the legal meaning would be moot, because it&amp;#39;s not grammatical.&amp;nbsp; Essentially, substantially, extremely etc. are adverbs and would modify the adjective, biological.&amp;nbsp; What kind of processes may be exempted??&amp;nbsp; Biological processes!&amp;nbsp; How biological are they??&amp;nbsp; They&amp;#39;re &lt;em&gt;&lt;span style="TEXT-DECORATION:underline;"&gt;extremely&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/em&gt; biological; they&amp;#39;re &lt;em&gt;&lt;span style="TEXT-DECORATION:underline;"&gt;substantially&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/em&gt; biological; they&amp;#39;re &lt;em&gt;&lt;span style="TEXT-DECORATION:underline;"&gt;essentially&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/em&gt; biological.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Okay.&amp;nbsp; I concede you have a point.&amp;nbsp; It could mean these processes are &lt;strong&gt;&lt;em&gt;&lt;span style="TEXT-DECORATION:underline;"&gt;mostly&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/strong&gt; biological.&amp;nbsp; I guess I agree with you.&amp;nbsp; (I couldn&amp;#39;t see it that way last night.)&amp;nbsp; In other words the exempted processes must be &lt;em&gt;&lt;span style="TEXT-DECORATION:underline;"&gt;mainly&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/em&gt; biological, and the non-biological aspects/components must be &lt;em&gt;&lt;span style="TEXT-DECORATION:underline;"&gt;non-essential&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/em&gt;.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&amp;quot;Essential biological processes&amp;quot; would have an entirely different meaning.&amp;nbsp; That is, &lt;span style="text-decoration:underline;"&gt;only those biological processes which are essential&lt;/span&gt;, vs. &lt;span style="text-decoration:underline;"&gt;only those processes which are essentially biological&lt;/span&gt;.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;I&amp;#39;m glad you pressed me on this.&amp;nbsp; I guess I owe MM an apology.&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp; - A.</description></item><item><title>Re: Poet's license?</title><link>http://www.englishforums.com/English/PoetsLicense/glbgj/post.htm#555569</link><pubDate>Sat, 16 Aug 2008 17:19:16 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="true">946f00bb-57d3-4b7b-a9a2-059b5341af52:555569</guid><dc:creator>Cool Breeze</dc:creator><description>&lt;BLOCKQUOTE&gt;&lt;div&gt;&lt;img src="/Themes/englishforums/images/icon-quote.gif"&gt; &lt;strong&gt;Ant_222&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;div&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;In these sentences:&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;1. From the East to the West I love you the best.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;2. You&amp;#39;re the girl&lt;font color="#0000ff"&gt; that I love best.&lt;/font&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;What&amp;#39; the reason for (not) modifying &amp;quot;girl&amp;quot; be the definite article?&amp;nbsp;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;div&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;/BLOCKQUOTE&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;I&amp;#39;m not sure I understand your question. &lt;i&gt;The&lt;/i&gt; is needed before &lt;i&gt;girl&lt;/i&gt; because of the restrictive&lt;font color="#0000ff"&gt; relative clause&lt;/font&gt;, which implies that there is only &lt;b&gt;one&lt;/b&gt; such girl. &lt;i&gt;The&lt;/i&gt; could be omitted before &lt;i&gt;best&lt;/i&gt; in the first sentence because &lt;i&gt;the best&lt;/i&gt; is an adverb, not an adjective. Nor is &lt;i&gt;the&lt;/i&gt; needed before &lt;i&gt;East&lt;/i&gt; and &lt;i&gt;West&lt;/i&gt; because they are opposites.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;CB &lt;br /&gt;</description></item><item><title>Re: Please correct my essay thanks my friends!!</title><link>http://www.englishforums.com/English/CorrectEssayFriends/gkqml/post.htm#555095</link><pubDate>Fri, 15 Aug 2008 12:28:04 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="true">946f00bb-57d3-4b7b-a9a2-059b5341af52:555095</guid><dc:creator>26TMNTJG2PG</dc:creator><description>&lt;BLOCKQUOTE&gt;&lt;div&gt;&lt;img src="/Themes/englishforums/images/icon-quote.gif"&gt; &lt;strong&gt;Dipsik&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;div&gt;Could you please explain to me why you didnÂ´t correct the indefinite article before the word &lt;strong&gt;kids&lt;/strong&gt; (second paragraph, first line)?&lt;/div&gt;&lt;/BLOCKQUOTE&gt; &lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt; &lt;p&gt;&lt;span&gt;You are right the &amp;#39;a&amp;#39; before &amp;#39;kids&amp;#39; should not be there. I missed out. Thank you. The original poster, please note.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;BLOCKQUOTE&gt;&lt;div&gt;&lt;img src="/Themes/englishforums/images/icon-quote.gif"&gt; &lt;strong&gt;Dipsik&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;div&gt;I would also write serious&lt;strong&gt;ly&lt;/strong&gt;, instead of the word &amp;quot;serious&amp;quot; you used (the latter is only used in&amp;nbsp;informal English&amp;nbsp;- at least as far as I know...)&lt;/div&gt;&lt;/BLOCKQUOTE&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;The part in question is &lt;p&gt;&lt;span style="COLOR:#12263b;"&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&amp;quot;The streets practically were &lt;/span&gt;&lt;span style="COLOR:red;"&gt;practically&lt;/span&gt;&lt;span style="COLOR:#12263b;"&gt; flooded but not &lt;/span&gt;&lt;span style="COLOR:red;"&gt;serious&lt;/span&gt;&lt;span style="COLOR:#12263b;"&gt; enough to cause a total flooding or some &lt;/span&gt;&lt;span style="COLOR:red;"&gt;any&lt;/span&gt;&lt;span style="COLOR:#12263b;"&gt; tragedy&amp;quot; and you have a point here as &amp;#39;seriously&amp;#39; will be another adverb modifying the verb &amp;#39;were flooded&amp;#39; but I used the adjective there to be illiptical for &amp;#39;the floods were not serious enough&amp;#39; to be natural.&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>Re: Alternately    vs.    Alternatively</title><link>http://www.englishforums.com/English/AlternatelyAlternatively/gjrbn/post.htm#545373</link><pubDate>Wed, 23 Jul 2008 10:38:02 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="true">946f00bb-57d3-4b7b-a9a2-059b5341af52:545373</guid><dc:creator>Mr Wordy</dc:creator><description>&lt;p&gt;&lt;BLOCKQUOTE&gt;&lt;div&gt;&lt;img src="/Themes/englishforums/images/icon-quote.gif"&gt; &lt;strong&gt;Cool Breeze&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;div&gt;Then I checked Webster&amp;#39;s and according to it &amp;quot;alternate&amp;quot; can mean the same as &amp;quot;alternative&amp;quot;:&lt;/div&gt;&lt;/BLOCKQUOTE&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Different people have different opinions on this, so you pays your money and you takes your choice I guess. Here are a few (randomly Googled) definitions that agree with my position:&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;San Diego State University Style Guide (&lt;a href="http://bfa.sdsu.edu/editorial/section2.htm"&gt;http://bfa.sdsu.edu/editorial/section2.htm&lt;/a&gt;):&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;blockquote&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&amp;quot;Alternately&amp;quot; means one after the other, in time or space. &amp;quot;Alternatively&amp;quot; means one instead of the other.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;/blockquote&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&amp;quot;250 Often Confused Words&amp;quot; (&lt;a href="http://www.alphadictionary.com/articles/confused_words.html"&gt;http://www.alphadictionary.com/articles/confused_words.html&lt;/a&gt;):&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;blockquote&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Alternately&lt;/strong&gt; means &amp;quot;taking turns&amp;quot;: We paddled alternately so neither of us would get too tired. &lt;br /&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Alternatively&lt;/strong&gt; means &amp;quot;as an option&amp;quot;: Instead of going by train, we could have gone alternatively by car. &lt;/p&gt;&lt;/blockquote&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&amp;quot;Easily Confused or Misused Words&amp;quot; (&lt;a href="http://www.infoplease.com/ipa/A0200807.html"&gt;http://www.infoplease.com/ipa/A0200807.html&lt;/a&gt;):&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;blockquote&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;em&gt;Alternately&lt;/em&gt; is an adverb that means in turn; one after the other: âWe alternately spun the wheel in the game.â &lt;em&gt;Alternatively&lt;/em&gt; is an adverb that means on the other hand; one or the other: âYou can choose a large bookcase or, alternatively, you can buy two small ones.â&lt;/p&gt;&lt;/blockquote&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>modifying an adjective</title><link>http://www.englishforums.com/English/ModifyingAnAdjective/gwccq/post.htm</link><pubDate>Mon, 14 Jul 2008 04:19:56 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="true">946f00bb-57d3-4b7b-a9a2-059b5341af52:541058</guid><dc:creator>Anonymous</dc:creator><description>Hi,&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;It is known to me that only adverb can modify an adjective but I have been modifying weather words/terms/adjectives?? like &amp;quot;sunny&amp;quot; with words like &amp;quot;sizzling&amp;quot; and &amp;quot;boiling&amp;quot;. Do you call them an adverb like &amp;quot;very&amp;quot;?? I have used the word/adjective &amp;quot;bright&amp;quot; to modify &amp;quot;sunny&amp;quot;. Is that wrong? I think we can use it in a pre-adjective position like this, &amp;quot;the bright, sunny weather&amp;quot; but it seems wrong to write &amp;quot;The weather is bright sunny&amp;quot; in a predicate position. Only an adverb can modify an adjective? I htink an article can modify it too.</description></item><item><title>Re: SUPERATIVE?</title><link>http://www.englishforums.com/English/Superative/ggjxm/post.htm#533455</link><pubDate>Fri, 27 Jun 2008 18:37:24 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="true">946f00bb-57d3-4b7b-a9a2-059b5341af52:533455</guid><dc:creator>Avangi</dc:creator><description>&lt;BLOCKQUOTE&gt;&lt;div&gt;&lt;img src="/Themes/englishforums/images/icon-quote.gif"&gt; &lt;strong&gt;Anonymous&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;div&gt;Thank you Why one has an article and one doesn&amp;#39;t?&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;em&gt;The most erroneous concepts&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;/em&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;em&gt;&lt;span style="TEXT-DECORATION:underline;"&gt;These/They&lt;/span&gt; are &lt;span style="TEXT-DECORATION:underline;"&gt;most/very&lt;/span&gt; erroneous concepts.&lt;/em&gt;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Is the word &amp;nbsp;&amp;#39;most&amp;#39; here is not a superlative? When is it an adjective and when is it a superlative?&amp;nbsp;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;He is &lt;span style="TEXT-DECORATION:underline;"&gt;the most handsome&lt;/span&gt; man I have ever met.&amp;nbsp; &lt;/div&gt;&lt;/BLOCKQUOTE&gt;First, let me call your attention to CB&amp;#39;s correction.&amp;nbsp; &amp;quot;Very&amp;quot; is an adverb, not an adjective, and it probably always was. &amp;quot;Most&amp;quot; is an adjective when it modifies a noun (&lt;em&gt;Most people can swim&lt;/em&gt;.), but in the two quite different usages we&amp;#39;ve been talking about here, it&amp;#39;s an adverb.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;1.&amp;nbsp; &lt;em&gt;This is a most beautiful rose.&lt;/em&gt;&amp;nbsp; (&amp;quot;most beautiful&amp;quot; = &amp;quot;very beautiful&amp;quot;,&amp;nbsp; singular rose,&amp;nbsp; indefinite article)&lt;br /&gt;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp; &lt;em&gt;These are most beautiful roses.&lt;/em&gt;&amp;nbsp; (&amp;quot;most beautiful&amp;quot; = &amp;quot;very beautiful,&amp;quot;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;plural roses, &lt;strong&gt;&lt;span style="TEXT-DECORATION:underline;"&gt;no article&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/strong&gt;)&lt;br /&gt;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp; &lt;em&gt;These are some most beautiful roses.&lt;/em&gt;&amp;nbsp; (&amp;quot;most beautiful&amp;quot; = &amp;quot;very beautiful,&amp;quot;&amp;nbsp; plural roses,&amp;nbsp; optional indefinite article)&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;2.&amp;nbsp; &lt;em&gt;This is the most beautiful rose in the garden.&lt;/em&gt;&amp;nbsp; (&amp;quot;most beautiful&amp;quot; = superlative, singular rose,&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;definite article)&lt;br /&gt;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp; &lt;em&gt;These are two of the most beautiful roses in the garden.&lt;/em&gt;&amp;nbsp; (&amp;quot;most beautiful&amp;quot; = superlative, plural roses, definite article)&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Please note that your examples, &lt;em&gt;This is a most erroneous concept,&lt;/em&gt; and&amp;nbsp; &lt;em&gt;These are most erroneous concepts&lt;/em&gt;&amp;nbsp; are of the first type, and are not superlatives.&amp;nbsp; You could say, &lt;em&gt;These are some most&lt;/em&gt; &lt;em&gt;erroneous concepts.&lt;/em&gt;&amp;nbsp; The &amp;quot;some&amp;quot; is optional.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Best wishes,&amp;nbsp; - A.</description></item><item><title>Re: use of "in particular"</title><link>http://www.englishforums.com/English/UseOfInParticular/ggwjb/post.htm#533070</link><pubDate>Thu, 26 Jun 2008 20:06:38 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="true">946f00bb-57d3-4b7b-a9a2-059b5341af52:533070</guid><dc:creator>Avangi</dc:creator><description>I&amp;#39;d recommend repeating the &amp;quot;of&amp;quot;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp; -&amp;nbsp; &lt;em&gt;and in particular, of children in the City.....&lt;/em&gt;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp; Even better, in my opinion, would be to repeat &amp;quot;the safety of&amp;quot;&amp;nbsp; -&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp; (&lt;em&gt;and in particular, the safety of children in the city...)&lt;/em&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;To my ear, you could avoid repeating it by switching to the adverb&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp; -&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&lt;em&gt;&amp;nbsp; the safety of citizens, particularly the children in the City....&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;/em&gt;I like &amp;quot;children&amp;quot; with the article, but think &amp;quot;citizens&amp;quot;&amp;nbsp; is fine without it.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Best wishes,&amp;nbsp; - A.</description></item><item><title>CASE?</title><link>http://www.englishforums.com/English/Case/gdgcc/post.htm</link><pubDate>Fri, 23 May 2008 01:55:05 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="true">946f00bb-57d3-4b7b-a9a2-059b5341af52:517635</guid><dc:creator>Anonymous</dc:creator><description>&lt;p&gt;Hi,&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;In the book named &amp;quot;Longman English Grammar&amp;quot; by L. G. Alexander in the section 8 named &amp;quot;Prepositions, Adverb particles, and Phrasal verbs,&amp;quot; I saw this sentence. What does &amp;#39;case&amp;#39; mean to you?&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;English uses more prepositions than most other European languages, partly because&amp;nbsp;&amp;#39;case&amp;#39; [&amp;gt;1.1] is no longer expressed by noun endings.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Also, what does &amp;#39;adverb particle&amp;#39; mean?&amp;nbsp;&lt;/p&gt;</description></item></channel></rss>