The "if" subjunctive variety was not the main issue here. At this juncture, we are not particularly concerned about the "if" conditionals, or degree of possibility and certainty. Perhaps that's another topic. The heavy

Hi, I have difficulty in understanding verb usage(two verbs given and go in same sentence) in below sentence and also please tell me the parts of speech in the sentence. You need articles as shown. Effective and substantial critiques

Matthew Huntbach (Email Removed): I introduced it, and I am from Sussex, not Yorkshire. "By then" indicating a point in time, followed by "would" and the present tense Grammatically, the part following the `would' (a modal

What is the usage or grammatical function of LET in this case, a conjuction or a verb? I'm not sure, but it seems like a modal auxiliary verb, changing the sense of 'be'. "Let x be y". Not really a modal - you can't

Hello: I am not sure about the particular definition and ... as sad as they might inside" Thank you. Marius Hancu What is the usage or grammatical function of LET in this case, a conjuction or a verb? I'm not sure, but it seems like a

/Be able to/ is similar to /can/. The reason it's not an auxiliary verb is that it uses a conjugation ... be the main verb? It seems to me that /ought to/ is to /should/ as /need to/ is to /must/. I don't think that "ought to" is