I repeat again we can't reference to religions about universal subjects. Religions are dogmatic subjects. We believe in or We don't. It depends on person.

Dear friend, the only possible combination is you were , regardless of either singular or plural reference. Respectfully, Gleb Chebrikoff

Thanks for the link, the list makes interesting reading. I congratulate your proud nation on reclaiming the top spot, though feel that the UK and America should not have climbed up the ladder. I don't feel that the traditional media have

Ooh, what's wrong, right clothes for inhibitions? / You couldn't afford the price of admission. Now the girl in this scene is wearing black body-fitting clothes. So is the guy telling her the clothes are not just for looking and she

Hi, please read this post and post your draft of the letter so that we can help you with it.

Kindly look into it for any kind of errors or inconsistencies. I'll be glad to have some critical responses. Thank you. "Dear Madam/Sir, I am XYZ, pursuing a bachelor degree in Engineering Physics at Indian Institute of Technology Delhi,

Without your second post asking "how come", I was so sure that you meant "the modal rules". The reason I made that comment was already explained. I thought your English level was better than to ask the elementary

Hello, Antonia a single word denoting the thing in question can hardly be found. One precise match would be domestic altercation , which, however, is used in a legal context (especially in criminal law). Apart from that, you might find useful the

1.Somehow this sort of traditional Hamlet aspect in the untraditional character he was playing didn't seem to fit together. 2.The people who want to play with the cards that have goods trains on have to sit here. 1) It is a very obtuse

expect is one of those verbs that implies a time relationship. You expect something to happen in the future . I am expecting the stock market to fail. = I believe (now) that in the future the stock market will fail. If you expect something now