There is supposed to be a comma after the year there. That is the rule. To advise somebody use the European method,13 August 2002, like is done in Europe, so you don't have to mess with commas, is disturbing and lazy. What is this, the

There is supposed to be a comma after the year there. That is the rule. To advise somebody use the European method,13 August 2002, like is done in Europe, so you don't have to mess with commas, is disturbing and lazy. What is this, the

Hi, I know there's like store policy when it comes to release dates but , if you already have it in storage , what's the difference if you sold it a few days earlier? Clive

IMHO, it's a matter of agreement with the manufacturer. Often, in the case of prestigious items, the retailer is licenced to sell the item under rather strict conditions. The release date may be advertised in advance, and it's only

I know there's like store policy when it comes to release dates , but if you already have it in storage , what's the difference if you sold it a few days earlier?

The comma rule in question here is not a matter of sylistic choice. It is a tested rule in many state tests that public school students must pass. In the sample sentence given above, a comma is necessary. Send your letter before September 30,

Hello, a friend of mine had to write a letter of apology for his course in Business English. He wrote the following letter of apology. The teacher crossed nearly all of his words out. Is the letter grammatically an absolutely nonsense or

Yes, I'd use a comma. However, the circumstances in which I'd spell out a date in this way are very limited. In fact, I can't think of a single one.

when spelling out a date do we use a comma as we would not spelling out a date? for example August 8, 2006 August eighth, two thousand six thank you!

A spokesperson for the star confirmed plans for the tome , which as yet has no title or release date. is this comma really needed here? if so, why? if removed then is it grammatically wrong? why use 'as' here?