Hi. Thank you. If the phrase "living creatures" were happen to be (for the illustration purpose of asking this question) "a living creature" in the singular, would you say placing a comma before the pronoun

Hi. Thank you. I think comma would be correct (or possibly optional in this case) before the word "which" in the definition I found in the Collins COBUILD Advanced Learner's English Dictionary. I feel/think the part "that is

Hi. In the Collins COBUILD Advanced Learner's English Dictionary, it has this definition for the word "enzyme," and I wonder if a comma before the word (pronoun?) "which" would be correct. Please help. I also think that the

The police found the murder weapon,which made the prosecutor's job much easier As others have said, the sentence is correct (if you add a space after the comma and a full stop / period at the end). In theory, which can refer to both the

my name is Dhia' Alharazneh , I'm a twenty-four years old , I live in amman with my family , I was born in salt at ninteen eighty-five . I graduated two years ago in june two thousand seven from hashemite university and I have a

Hi Nik, Here are my thoughts. * It's difficult to read this (part of) essay. There are five characters: two women (roommates), a boyfriend, an advice-giving man ( "The man suggests" ), and a teller ( "I think that..." ).

Hi, In the minds of many people living in England, before Australia was Australia, it was the antipodes, the opposite pole to civilization, an obscure and unimaginable place that was considered the end of the world. (A) before

Yes, initially I also thought that was the difference. But as you can see the comments I've gotten, it seems that you don't have to have at least three even when you use the first sentence. Yes, I do know full well how people actually use

Hi Redalert, and welcome to English Forums. How Money Works -- This is a title. This is how money works. -- This is a sentence. Both are okay in the right conrext. My name is ABC. I live in the US and am studying English. In

CJ used the term "referent" recently. Does that differ in any significant way from an "antecedent?" I don't think so. Relative clauses are simple and straightforward in English grammar compared with the use of