<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" ?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/" xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"><channel><title>Search results for 'tag:Conditionals tag:Mixed conditionals' matching tags 'Conditionals' and 'Mixed conditionals'</title><link>http://www.englishforums.com/search/pro.htm?q=tag%3aConditionals+tag%3aMixed+conditionals&amp;tag=Conditionals,Mixed+conditionals&amp;orTags=0</link><description>Search results for 'tag:Conditionals tag:Mixed conditionals' matching tags 'Conditionals' and 'Mixed conditionals'</description><dc:language>en-US</dc:language><generator>CSMOD (Build: 3170.30230)</generator><item><title>Re: same conditional?</title><link>http://www.englishforums.com/English/SameConditional/gmjcn/post.htm#562730</link><pubDate>Fri, 05 Sep 2008 06:14:21 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="true">946f00bb-57d3-4b7b-a9a2-059b5341af52:562730</guid><dc:creator>Anonymous</dc:creator><description>Thank you so much. This is your response in a thread named &amp;quot;conditional.&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;You said:&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;You have another post on nearly the same subject.&amp;nbsp; See my answer there. &lt;p&gt;&lt;/p&gt; &lt;p&gt;They are mixed conditionals, and they are very awkward.&amp;nbsp; &lt;img title="Sad" alt="Sad" src="http://www.englishforums.com/emoticons/emotion-6.gif" /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;/p&gt; &lt;p&gt;&lt;br /&gt;If I am not mistaken, you seem to have said the examples given there&amp;nbsp;are mixed condtionals and the examples there and here seem to be pretty similar in terms of structures. Why did you say &amp;quot;wrong&amp;quot; here and said &amp;quot;very awkward&amp;quot; there? I think it is a common knowledge that a mixed conditional can be established by mixing an imagined (could it be a real event??) in the past with its present result.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Also, I saw something like this, is this correct? I think it is rare to the modal &amp;quot;would&amp;quot; in the if-clause.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;em&gt;Take it if you would like to have it.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;/em&gt;Why not make it a first conditional like this?&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;em&gt;Take it if you&amp;nbsp;like to have it.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>Re: conditional</title><link>http://www.englishforums.com/English/Conditional/gmjbm/post.htm#562712</link><pubDate>Fri, 05 Sep 2008 05:12:08 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="true">946f00bb-57d3-4b7b-a9a2-059b5341af52:562712</guid><dc:creator>CalifJim</dc:creator><description>You have another post on nearly the same subject.&amp;nbsp; See my answer there.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;They are mixed conditionals, and they are very awkward.&amp;nbsp; &lt;img src="http://www.englishforums.com/emoticons/emotion-6.gif" alt="Sad" title="Sad" /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;CJ&amp;nbsp;</description></item><item><title>conditional</title><link>http://www.englishforums.com/English/Conditional/gmjrj/post.htm</link><pubDate>Fri, 05 Sep 2008 04:41:48 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="true">946f00bb-57d3-4b7b-a9a2-059b5341af52:562692</guid><dc:creator>Anonymous</dc:creator><description>Hi,&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Is this a mixed conditional where a present result is predicated upon a hypothetical past action?&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;em&gt;I would apologize if there had been a sign of uneasiness on my part toward you at the meeting.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;/em&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Is this somewhat the same as this?&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;em&gt;I would apologize if I had sown a sign of uneasiness toward you at the meeting.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;/em&gt;If yes, would you say both are a mixed conditional?</description></item><item><title>Re: How to transform this sentences</title><link>http://www.englishforums.com/English/TransformSentences/gmwbn/post.htm#562424</link><pubDate>Thu, 04 Sep 2008 13:58:43 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="true">946f00bb-57d3-4b7b-a9a2-059b5341af52:562424</guid><dc:creator>Tanit</dc:creator><description>Thanks for your feedback, Barb.&lt;br /&gt;As for no. 8, students are generally expected to write standard types of conditionals, so I guess Anex&amp;#39; sentence would be the correct choice in a test.&lt;br /&gt;I posted the one with the mixed conditional because I was wondering if native speakers would perceive any difference between them. My idea was that type 3 &lt;em&gt;(If I had been a good cook...)&lt;/em&gt; might imply that in the meantime I learnt how to cook, while the mixed type &lt;em&gt;(If I were a good cook...)&lt;/em&gt; might stress the fact that I did not make any improvement (still not a good cook while speaking).&lt;br /&gt;However, you write that you don&amp;#39;t perceive much difference, so I was probably on the wrong track. &lt;img src="http://www.englishforums.com/emoticons/emotion-1.gif" alt="Smile" title="Smile" /&gt;</description></item><item><title>Re: have/has/were</title><link>http://www.englishforums.com/English/HaveHasWere/gmgcw/post.htm#561858</link><pubDate>Wed, 03 Sep 2008 05:28:46 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="true">946f00bb-57d3-4b7b-a9a2-059b5341af52:561858</guid><dc:creator>Mister Micawber</dc:creator><description>.&lt;br /&gt;1-- Were is the &lt;a href="http://www.bartleby.com/64/C001/061.html" target="_blank" title="http://www.bartleby.com/64/C001/061.html"&gt;SUBJUNCTIVE&lt;/a&gt; form of the verb, here used in a mixed conditional sentence (more crefully written, it should read &lt;em&gt;If I &lt;strong&gt;were &lt;/strong&gt;there, I &lt;strong&gt;would do&lt;/strong&gt; that.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;/em&gt;2-- Your sentence is wrong.&amp;nbsp; It should read: &lt;em&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Doesn&amp;#39;t&lt;/strong&gt; Vincent&lt;strong&gt; have&lt;/strong&gt; any homework?&lt;/em&gt;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp; The singular &amp;#39;-s&amp;#39; is in &amp;#39;doesn&amp;#39;t&amp;#39;.&lt;br /&gt;.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;em&gt;&lt;/em&gt;</description></item><item><title>Re: tense difference</title><link>http://www.englishforums.com/English/TenseDifference/glqzr/post.htm#559878</link><pubDate>Fri, 29 Aug 2008 00:08:57 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="true">946f00bb-57d3-4b7b-a9a2-059b5341af52:559878</guid><dc:creator>Anonymous</dc:creator><description>Thank you.&amp;nbsp; I think my version is called a mixed condtionl with present-time implications, whereas Mr. M&amp;#39;s correctional effort could be called a type 3 conditional.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;My original writing, I believe,&amp;nbsp;dealt with a person about to graduate from middle schoo.&amp;nbsp;I think I wrote how wonderful it was, the teachers and students included. Then, I thought about Sue, then came to this:&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Mr. M&amp;#39;s correction:&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;I remember Sue, who transferred to another school just two months before this graduation date. Had she stayed in our school , she would have been expecting to graduate in a month like me.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;My orginal sentences:&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;I remember Sue, who transferred to another school just two months before this graduation date. Had she stayed in our school , she would be expecting to graduate in a month like me.&lt;br /&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;br /&gt;I feel my version is OK, possibly better,&amp;nbsp;since it carries a present-day implication as a mixed conditional, like &amp;quot;If I had studied harder at high school, I would be expecting to a good college now.&amp;quot;</description></item><item><title>Re: If it would make you feel more comfortable...</title><link>http://www.englishforums.com/English/WouldFeelComfortable/gkkxc/post.htm#553386</link><pubDate>Sun, 10 Aug 2008 23:11:47 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="true">946f00bb-57d3-4b7b-a9a2-059b5341af52:553386</guid><dc:creator>Huevos</dc:creator><description>&lt;BLOCKQUOTE&gt;&lt;div&gt;&lt;img src="/Themes/englishforums/images/icon-quote.gif"&gt; &lt;strong&gt;Avangi&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;div&gt;I think your second example is a tense problem.&lt;/div&gt;&lt;/BLOCKQUOTE&gt;It&amp;#39;s fine. It&amp;#39;s just a mixed conditional. It is stating with certainty that he will submit to the conditional clause if the &amp;quot;if&amp;quot; clause is fulfilled. In the &amp;quot;if&amp;quot; clause though &amp;quot;would&amp;quot; is used to show a lower possibility or lack of belief that the clause will be fulfilled.&lt;br /&gt;</description></item><item><title>Re: if he committed</title><link>http://www.englishforums.com/English/IfHeCommitted/gjkdr/post.htm#548284</link><pubDate>Tue, 29 Jul 2008 18:38:26 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="true">946f00bb-57d3-4b7b-a9a2-059b5341af52:548284</guid><dc:creator>Ant_222</dc:creator><description>Yes, although it is a mixed conditional. This phrase might be said by judge, for example. Some crime was committed in the past, whereas the hypothetical punishment is in the future.</description></item><item><title>Long questions on conditional sentences</title><link>http://www.englishforums.com/English/QuestionsConditionalSentences/gjzhl/post.htm</link><pubDate>Sun, 27 Jul 2008 08:30:36 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="true">946f00bb-57d3-4b7b-a9a2-059b5341af52:546918</guid><dc:creator>Anonymous</dc:creator><description>Hi,&lt;br /&gt;1.How are they different? I think the first one is&amp;nbsp;mixed conditional and the second one is a third conditional sentence. Both seem to contain the notion of unreality (hypothetical?) to the&amp;nbsp;unlikely past actions&amp;nbsp;&lt;br /&gt;&amp;nbsp;1.I were rich, I would have bought the house when it was on sale.&lt;br /&gt;2. If I had been rich,&amp;nbsp;I would have bought the house when it was on sale.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;2. How would I know if&amp;nbsp;any of these need to be second condtional (subjunctive??) sentences?&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;I got these sentence bits&amp;nbsp;from the Google book search (I hope I type them right)&amp;nbsp;:&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&lt;br /&gt;1. If I was baptized the right way, God would be gracious. -- I think this shoud be the subjunctive because I sense unreality (or hypotherical) in the sentence, thus shoud be: If I were baptized ...&lt;br /&gt;2. If I was restless during the service, she would give me something to eat. -- I think this is OK as a&amp;nbsp; backshift of the first conditional, but&amp;nbsp; as I think what CalifJim has said (might have said?)&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;(according my unreliable vague recollection), most of the times, people would write this kind of structural sentence like &amp;quot;If I were restless during the service, she would give me something to eat.&lt;br /&gt;3. If I was at all curious -- which I am not -- I might askyou what you you&amp;#39;re doing in such a house -- Ditto as no. 2&amp;#39;s argument: I think most likely people would have written: If I were at all curious -- which I am not -- I might ask you what you&amp;#39;re doing in such a house.&amp;quot;</description></item><item><title>Re: Conditional or not?</title><link>http://www.englishforums.com/English/ConditionalOrNot/gzkqr/post.htm#528853</link><pubDate>Tue, 17 Jun 2008 23:13:15 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="true">946f00bb-57d3-4b7b-a9a2-059b5341af52:528853</guid><dc:creator>CalifJim</dc:creator><description>1, They began asking us several months ago if we would stay.&amp;nbsp; &lt;font color="#0000ff"&gt;Not a conditional at all.&amp;nbsp; &lt;i&gt;if/whether we would stay&lt;/i&gt; is an indirect question.&lt;/font&gt;&lt;br /&gt;2. I said I would stay if I could do two shows a night.-- looks to be a type 2 conditional (unreal)&amp;nbsp; &lt;font color="#0000ff"&gt;Yes.&amp;nbsp; Type 2.&lt;/font&gt;&lt;br /&gt;3. If there would be a church in this neighborhood, it would be ideal. -- looks to be a type 2 conditional (unreal)&amp;nbsp;&lt;i&gt; &lt;font color="#0000ff"&gt;If there &lt;b&gt;were&lt;/b&gt; a church ... &lt;/font&gt;&lt;/i&gt;&lt;font color="#0000ff"&gt;Type 2.&lt;/font&gt;&lt;br /&gt;4. If there were a Burnham wood in ***,&amp;nbsp;they probably would have shipped it. -- looks to be a type 2 conditional (unreal)&amp;nbsp; &lt;font color="#0000ff"&gt;Mixed conditional. 2 and 3.&lt;/font&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;font color="#0000ff"&gt;CJ&amp;nbsp;&lt;/font&gt;</description></item></channel></rss>