Game has already been released. If we still have or had to wait for a patch, what is or was the point of releasing the game on the official release date? What's wrong with this sentence? Also is there another usage for had aside from the

I agree with Ivan's analysis except: the second sentence is an example of a common error, even among natives. The third sentence is correct. The question is was/were usage with the subjunctive. Were is needed here because it is an example

You seemed to be having a lot of problems with the modals. We like to help you but I think you need to do some research and studying on your own on the modals. Many learners are confused by the past tense concept with the modals and also the

You seemed to be having a lot of problems with the modals. We like to help you but I think you need to do some research and studying on your own on the modals. Many learners are confused by the past tense concept with the modals and also the

Hi, Here's what I think. Yes, they are all conditional sentences. Your second and third sentences differ only in the verb's form (there was vs there were). I would use "there was" but perhaps "there were" is

Exactly? No. There are no "exact definitions". Each of these has multiple usages. should - it is advisable; it is a good idea (for ... to ...) You should buy that car. ~ It is advisable for you to buy that car. ~ In my opinion, it is a

Thank you Ferdis. But, that sentence was part of a GMAT test and the correct option is the one that is underlined. I chose the "had done" structure but was incorrect. I want to know why. I know about Mixed-conditionals and Special

Thanks for replying AlpeccaStars and Clive. AlpheccaStars, just wondering, which defintion does this usage of 'would' fall into? Is it the second one? Thank you again. (M-W) 1 a archaic : WISHED, DESIRED b archaic : wish for : WANT c (1)

Hello,Avangi , Thank you foring your kind and clear explaination. You are always so patient ^_^.But I also have three problems. 1, what's the usage of "giong on" and 'going on with"? 2, According to veterinarian Carol

I think it has been said that the modal "would" is a past form of "will" but that would seem like over-generalizing to me since there seem to be many categories of its use as given by many grammar sources. I don't think