Is it OK to use the next dive in this context? The next dive by affected diver, may cause a larger pneumocephalus event with greater consequences, perhaps even a fatal outcome.

Hi, To some extent, it's a subjective matter of style, and it also depends a lot on the context. Finally, in modern English we try if possible to avoid having a lot of commas. Here are a few examples of how I would write. He

Context might help. I take it as a stylistic device. The "on" is superfluous, and serves for emphasis. Take it on out. Bring 'em on in. Round 'em on up. Bring 'em on over. Drive 'er on in. Come on down. Edit. I agree

Hi, You have given no context. So, here are a couple of general comments. work it out means 'go through the process of finding a solution'. on often adds to a phrase a sense of continuing (eg 'go on').

1) Does this expression exist or should I leave distribution and logistics out? 2) Have I used prepositions correctly with the temperature regimes expression? Here is the context: Within our production plant there is a logistics and distribution

Hi, which one is correct? "i can't handle different things at different approaches at a time" No. You need to say 'at the same time' . This means 'simultaneously'. or "i can't handle different

In this context, all 4 are OK, because the intent is clear. However, the 'as' clause (like a 'while' clause) usually requires the past progressive to make clear that its action is of a duration surrounding the relatively instantaneous action of

My question is, why the answer "approach" is incorrect? It's incorrect because an approach is a way of going about solving a problem or performing a task. So the word approach is used completely differently from means . approach has

As a stand alone, I'd use "everything." If in prior context you specify, I'd use "all." ( all of the above , not everything above )

Yes, that's it. Perhaps I could use general goods in my context.