<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" ?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/" xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"><channel><title>Search results for 'tag:Conversations tag:Adjuncts' matching tags 'Conversations' and 'Adjuncts'</title><link>http://www.englishforums.com/search/pro.htm?q=tag%3aConversations+tag%3aAdjuncts&amp;tag=Conversations,Adjuncts&amp;orTags=0</link><description>Search results for 'tag:Conversations tag:Adjuncts' matching tags 'Conversations' and 'Adjuncts'</description><dc:language>en-US</dc:language><generator>CSMOD (Build: 3140.34611)</generator><item><title>Re: Tenses</title><link>http://www.englishforums.com/English/Tenses/2/xlvv/Post.htm#72033</link><pubDate>Fri, 04 Feb 2005 08:53:01 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="true">946f00bb-57d3-4b7b-a9a2-059b5341af52:72033</guid><dc:creator>just the truth</dc:creator><description>And a good day to you, Mr P. I see your point. But they are different situations. It's not logical to suggest that one grammar pattern can extend to all situations; there are obvious semantic considerations.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Allow me to explain and then please point out where you feel Iâve erred. &lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;As Iâve often mentioned; what is important to language choice; CONTEXT-CONTEXT-CONTEXT. &lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;I cannot stress enough how important this is. But Iâm sure you already know this. Itâs important for ESLs to realize this, fed as they all were/are, with context poor example sentences.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;The difference between your 1. &amp; 2. is, âbeing the oldest can only be a singularity that occurs once at a given moment. Each of those moments represent a single instance. These separate instances cannot be gathered into a collective sense in the same way as the ânice things she has doneâ can be. âMy oldest moments have been ... â ???? &lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Sentence 2 never happens because, though it is grammatical in form, it is ungrammatical in use. Itâs a semantic absurdity. Well, one might suggest - indeed Mr P has - that the same applies to example 1. And you have a point, Sir, but only for some contexts.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Situation 1: &lt;br /&gt;1A. I realized {THEN}/ you were the best thing / that HAD ever happened to me. &lt;br /&gt; &lt;br /&gt;If this were written or if the speaker added a specific time adjunct, eg. âthenâ, the likelihood would be that  or a simple past tense would be chosen. &lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;{A little aside BUT NOTE WELL: either past perfect or simple past would work, yet many ESL sudents operate under the mistaken belief that when there are two past tense actions, one has to be marked by past perfect, [which one is it? I always forget. &lt;img src="/emoticons/emotion-5.gif" alt="Wink [;)]" /&gt;]&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Situation 2: &lt;br /&gt;The speaker is face to face with his lady, holding her hands, gazing deeply into her eyes, expressing his deepest emotions.&lt;br /&gt; &lt;br /&gt;1. I realized/ you were the best thing / that HAS ever happened to me. &lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt; makes the collection of things, all the things that have continued to reinforce that belief, and which collectively at the moment of speaking, could cause him to say,&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;1B. I realized (epiphany) {because of all you had been doing} you were the best thing {these things havenât stopped} that HAS ever happened to me. &lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Using a  in such a situation may well elicit a "Did you say 'had'?", from the lady, causing the speaker to immediately clarify that âsheâ is indeed, still the best thing. &lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;In speech, tense choice is much more fluid, because the context is much much richer and therefore, much easier to understand. Using  is almost as if the speaker did insert a  after , as in, &lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;1B. I realized (epiphany) {because of all you had been doing} you were, ARE the best thing {these things havenât stopped} that HAS ever happened to me. &lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;A past tense  can often be used where a present perfect  can be used, more especially so in NaE but also in BrE. &lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;CalifJim, I think, has helped to point this up. {see Jim's post} His confusion came [I believe] because he thought I should have used  instead of what I did use, . &lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Jim stated, âI think, JT, that you meant to write the following, didn't you?â The âfollowingâ referred to Jim's thinking that I should have, given my reasoning, chosen the present perfect, .&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Since the only difference [SOMETIMES] between choosing a simple past tense or a present perfect is one of greater or lesser emotion/importance, my choice reflected that there was no need for me to add any importance to a simple statement of fact, a fact, it must be remembered, that is being VIEWED thru my eyes.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;The âaspectâ choice [and it is more a choice of âaspectâ rather than âtenseâ] differs because of the situation, because of the relative importance of the finished action TO THE SPEAKER. &lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;"I finished my homework." &amp; "I've finished my homework." both describe the same finished event. &lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;How do they differ? Consider;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Anne: [the sweater is Anneâs, and sheâs warned her sister, time and again, not to wear it. She registers her displeasure with her Mom]&lt;br /&gt;Maaaaaommm, sheâs worn my sweater again. Iâm gonna kill her! &lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;But the 'aspect' differs if I comment of this situation.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;JJT: [I donât even know these folks, Iâve simply overheard the conversation and what Anneâs sister did {OR has done} is of little consequence to me]&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Choice 1. JTT: That girlâs sister wore her sweater.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Choice 2. JTT: That girlâs sister has worn her sweater. ??? &lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Choice 2 is definitely strange because my interest in this affair is miniscule. BrE speakers make much greater use of the present perfect to discuss recent past events, but I will suggest that it may well be strange even for a BrE speaker to choose 2 given the circumstances.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;{if it isn't strange to BrE speakers, then they sure don't know how to use the English language.&lt;img src="/emoticons/emotion-5.gif" alt="Wink [;)]" /&gt;</description></item></channel></rss>